The Acoustic Guitar Forum

Go Back   The Acoustic Guitar Forum > General Acoustic Guitar and Amplification Discussion > Carbon Fiber

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 10-10-2022, 11:58 AM
accraw3's Avatar
accraw3 accraw3 is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2020
Posts: 63
Default McPherson Sable Concerns

Well, after nearly 4 years of looking and ogling a Sable, I finally bought one from Eddie’s guitars last week. I purchased it Monday and it arrived on Wednesday.

Upon opening it I was visually stunned, but after tuning it up I was a little underwhelmed. To be fair, it had been over a year since I’d played one in person, but I remembered more volume and more bass. No big deal.

I played it for a few days and found the sweet spot, it was really growing on me. Until I had it out this weekend and noticed the bridge was lifting in the corner on both the treble and bass side. See pics.
IMG_0047.jpgIMG_0046.jpgIMG_0044.jpgIMG_0045.jpgIMG_0042.jpg

I reached out to Eddie’s this morning and after a short phone call, emailing them the above photos, they have offered me an option to exchange or have it repaired. I’m going to exchange it but I was curious is anyone has experienced dramatic differences between different Sables like is common with wood guitars?

I just remembered being a little more seduced by the Sable previously. It was the model with the big headstock logo and the circle fretboard inlays, maybe they’ve made some changes or maybe my ears have changed. I just thought I’d ask.

Thanks!

Also, Eddie’s Guitars seems to be a fantastic place.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-10-2022, 02:18 PM
JackDaniel JackDaniel is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2021
Posts: 203
Default

I agree. While I love the tone, I found the sound somewhat muted. Weird... I think it's all the bracing inside perhaps?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-10-2022, 02:20 PM
raysachs's Avatar
raysachs raysachs is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Eugene, OR & Wilmington, NC
Posts: 4,776
Default

Interesting. I had the opposite reaction. I played one for a few days a year ago and liked it but didn't love it. It was the one with the big garish badge on the headstock. Couldn't afford it at the time without selling my 000-28EC, which, after playing both a lot, just wasn't gonna do. There's some overlap in their sound (somewhat surprisingly), but I liked the EC way more than the Sable. This year I was able to afford a Sable without having to sell anything. I've had it for almost a month and I'm blown away by this one - this has the much more subtle "McPherson" logo in script letters on the headstock. And although I don't need to financially - I'm thinking about selling my 000-28EC because the Sable covers so much of he same ground.

I think it takes more to drive the Sable's top than either of my wooden guitars, but with either medium strings, or a heavier pick, or both, it just sounds incredible. I'm not playing it finger style, which may present it's own issues. I've stayed with light strings, but I'm playing it with a 1.5mm pick where I play my other two guitars with a 1mm or sometimes lighter pick. What little fingerpicking I do happens on my CEO-7, which I prefer for that application for a few reasons.

The bridge shouldn't be lifting, so that's worth fixing or exchanging. But I'm LOVING the newer Sable much more than the older one...

-Ray
__________________
"It's just honest human stuff that hadn't been near a dang metronome in its life" - Benmont Tench

Last edited by raysachs; 10-11-2022 at 09:17 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-10-2022, 03:06 PM
JackDaniel JackDaniel is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2021
Posts: 203
Default

I was under the impression that nothing has changed other than aesthetics... Weird. I'm running light strings as well. I found mediums much too painful and tiring to play. Perhaps the scale length is to play as well? Not sure if there is another work around. I think I heard about some strings that were lower tension?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-10-2022, 04:18 PM
accraw3's Avatar
accraw3 accraw3 is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2020
Posts: 63
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by raysachs View Post
Interesting. I had the opposite reaction. I played one for a few days a year ago and liked it but didn't love it. It was the one with the big garish badge on the headstock. Couldn't afford it at the time without selling my 000-28EC, which, after playing both a lot, just wasn't gonna do. There's some overlap in their sound (somewhat surprisingly), but I liked the EC way more than the Sable. This year I was able to afford a Sable without having to sell anything. I've had it for almost a month and I'm blown away by this one - this has the much more subtle "McPherson" logo in script letters on the headstock. And although I don't need to financially - I'm getting ready to sell my 000-28EC because I just can't see when I'm gonna pick it up over the Sable. The EC just doesn't sound as full and I'd be keeping it around primarily because I like how it looks, which to me is a not a good reason to hold onto a guitar.



I think it takes more to drive the Sable's top than either of my wooden guitars, but with either medium strings, or a heavier pick, or both, it just sounds incredible. I'm not playing it finger style, which may present it's own issues. I've stayed with light strings, but I'm playing it with a 1.5mm pick where I play my other two guitars with a 1mm or sometimes lighter pick. What little fingerpicking I do happens on my CEO-7, which I prefer for that application for a few reasons.



The bridge shouldn't be lifting, so that's worth fixing or exchanging. But I'm LOVING the newer Sable much more than the older one...



-Ray


They are going to send me a camo one. The only other option was the honeycomb blackout, but it doesn’t have the HSC.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-10-2022, 06:50 PM
jdinco jdinco is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Colorado
Posts: 4,403
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JackDaniel View Post
I was under the impression that nothing has changed other than aesthetics...
That's what McPherson told me too....
__________________
John
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-10-2022, 07:07 PM
BlueStarfish BlueStarfish is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Posts: 389
Default

Hi Accraw3,

I’ve got a Sable and quite like it.

When I first got it I found the tone on the dark side and volume seemed low. I found the following tips helped bring out the treble (which in turn made it seem louder):

1. Stay with medium gage strings — don’t go light.

2. If the action feels stiff with medium strings, check the nut slot height. I slightly lowered the nut slots on mine which improved the playability. Be careful on this one — if you aren’t comfortable being your own guitar tech then take it to a local shop that has a good acoustic guitar tech.

3. Choose strings that are on the bright side. I like 80/20’s, not the coated Elixers but ones with a thinner “treatment” instead so they last a while (like the Martin Lifespans, I think that’s actually what I’ve got on right now). Also try Ernie Ball’s Aluminum Bronze.

4. Flatpick — try one a little thinner than you might normally use. As an example, on most of my guitars I prefer a large triangle (Fender 351 shape) in a 1.5 mm thickness with a speed bevel. I like Dunlop Primetones and Wegen — a little less costly than the famous Blue Chips. On the Sable, I like a 1.0 mm thickness large triangle (available from Wegen). Sounds like a small difference but was a big help in bringing out a little more treble.

With those adjustments, I find I really like the Sable. It’s not a D18 (after all it’s an OM sized guitar) but I’ve taken it to acoustic jam sessions and been happy with tone and volume. Best of luck to you!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-10-2022, 07:19 PM
raysachs's Avatar
raysachs raysachs is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Eugene, OR & Wilmington, NC
Posts: 4,776
Default

It may just be a matter of expectations. I wasn’t overly impressed with the Sable when I first played one, so no expectations for this one, and it blew me away. The OP was blown away when he first played one, his expectations were sky high, and he was disappointed. Seems kind of normal to me…

May or may not be all that’s at play, but it doesn’t seem far fetched to me that it could be part of it…

-Ray
__________________
"It's just honest human stuff that hadn't been near a dang metronome in its life" - Benmont Tench

Last edited by raysachs; 10-11-2022 at 05:10 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-11-2022, 07:08 AM
accraw3's Avatar
accraw3 accraw3 is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2020
Posts: 63
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BlueStarfish View Post
Hi Accraw3,



I’ve got a Sable and quite like it.



When I first got it I found the tone on the dark side and volume seemed low. I found the following tips helped bring out the treble (which in turn made it seem louder):



1. Stay with medium gage strings — don’t go light.



2. If the action feels stiff with medium strings, check the nut slot height. I slightly lowered the nut slots on mine which improved the playability. Be careful on this one — if you aren’t comfortable being your own guitar tech then take it to a local shop that has a good acoustic guitar tech.



3. Choose strings that are on the bright side. I like 80/20’s, not the coated Elixers but ones with a thinner “treatment” instead so they last a while (like the Martin Lifespans, I think that’s actually what I’ve got on right now). Also try Ernie Ball’s Aluminum Bronze.



4. Flatpick — try one a little thinner than you might normally use. As an example, on most of my guitars I prefer a large triangle (Fender 351 shape) in a 1.5 mm thickness with a speed bevel. I like Dunlop Primetones and Wegen — a little less costly than the famous Blue Chips. On the Sable, I like a 1.0 mm thickness large triangle (available from Wegen). Sounds like a small difference but was a big help in bringing out a little more treble.



With those adjustments, I find I really like the Sable. It’s not a D18 (after all it’s an OM sized guitar) but I’ve taken it to acoustic jam sessions and been happy with tone and volume. Best of luck to you!


Thanks! I’ll see how the new one is when it arrives, but I will make some adjustments if it needs it.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-11-2022, 01:37 PM
gerardo1000 gerardo1000 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,448
Default

I agree that to get the best of the Sable you really have to drive the top. This is impossibke if you, like me, play only fingerstyle with your bare fingers, with no nails or picks. That is the reason why, with some regret, I sold it.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 10-11-2022, 02:11 PM
JackDaniel JackDaniel is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2021
Posts: 203
Default

That's a real bummer. Playing a two hour gig with medium strings is killer! Does that actually get better with practice?

Will definitely try the nut slot trick.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 10-11-2022, 04:03 PM
accraw3's Avatar
accraw3 accraw3 is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2020
Posts: 63
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gerardo1000 View Post
I agree that to get the best of the Sable you really have to drive the top. This is impossibke if you, like me, play only fingerstyle with your bare fingers, with no nails or picks. That is the reason why, with some regret, I sold it.


I can see that. I recently got into using Black Mountain thumb picks, which I like a lot. But I also generally play with a light touch.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 10-11-2022, 10:54 PM
Keith Lee Keith Lee is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 123
Default

Had a Sable for awhile, impulsively traded towards a different guitar

Had planned to use outside in all weathers but didn't

Kind of wish I still had it now that I'm wanting to play outside in cold again

Remember tone as better than expected, but more functional than inherently soulful...probably a carbon fiber trade off
__________________
2018 Gibson Songwriter EC
1938 Kalamazoo KG 16
1997 Guild Starfire II
Guild Acoustic Fretless Bass
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 10-11-2022, 11:42 PM
steelvibe steelvibe is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: my father's attic
Posts: 5,792
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Keith Lee View Post
Remember tone as better than expected, but more functional than inherently soulful...probably a carbon fiber trade off
Excellent statement really. I would say though, that the Sable and Touring both have about as much "soul" as a man-made material deserves to have. Just great sounding guitars and, in my opinion, that would be true even if they were made from junkyard scrap metal.
__________________
Don't chase tone. Make tone.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 10-12-2022, 11:36 AM
Captain Jim Captain Jim is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Arizona (from island boy to desert dweller)
Posts: 6,973
Default

Ah, Grasshopper, "the soul" is in the player not the instrument.

I don't notice that my CF guitars have any more or less "soul" than my wood guitars. Although, when I ordered my X10 when they were first released, I did ask Alistair to put in a bit of extra "Irish mojo". I noticed it right away.
__________________
Some CF, some wood.
Reply With Quote
Reply

  The Acoustic Guitar Forum > General Acoustic Guitar and Amplification Discussion > Carbon Fiber






All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:17 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, The Acoustic Guitar Forum
vB Ad Management by =RedTyger=