#1
|
|||
|
|||
Wood Binding
FACT OR FICTION ..... wood binding sounds better than plastic binding on an identical guitar ............
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
I'd pick that one.
__________________
Derek Coombs Youtube -> Website -> Music -> Tabs Guitars by Mark Blanchard, Albert&Mueller, Paul Woolson, Collings, Composite Acoustics, and Derek Coombs "Reality is that which when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away." Woods hands pick by eye and ear
Made to one with pride and love To be that we hold so dear A voice from heavens above |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
I think we need more information - what type of wood is the binding? What color is the plastic? It's difficult to make generalizations, so the more information you can supply, the better response you are likely to receive.
(I'm being a bit of a smartass, of course, but I'm curious as to whether any of the builders in the forum think the binding makes a sonic difference - so it's a free bump, anyway. Then again, I just spent several hours trying to choose from among several almost identical six-hole trems for a partscaster I'm working on, so I think I'll crawl back into my glass doghouse and await more informed opinions....) |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
But I would doubt that I would hear a difference; it's a relatively inert part of the guitar: directly underneath is the lining. Why do you ask? Jim McCarthy |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
I've never heard anybody claim that binding or purfling make any sonic difference.
__________________
"What have I learned but the proper use for several tools" -Gary Snyder Bourgeois DR-A / Bowerman "Working Man's" OM / Martin Custom D-18 (adi & flame) / Martin OM-21 / Northwood M70 MJ / 1970s Sigma DR-7 / Eastman E6D / Flatiron Signature A5 / Silverangel Econo A (Call me Dan) |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
There is not a lot of vibration going on in that area of the box but one thing is for sure is that wood WILL make a lot stronger mechanical joint than plastic.
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
Larrivee has the right idea. In my mind it sure looks a whole lot nicer....
__________________
Emerald X20 Emerald X20-12 Fender Robert Cray Stratocaster Martin D18 Ambertone Martin 000-15sm |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
There are two main types of plastic being used, and I see one as vastly superior to the other, if just because of the glue required. The two types are Bolteron, and Celluloid. Can you guess which I prefer and why? Doesn't matter that much as more than 95% of my work uses wood bindings, and that's no accident.
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
Ervin Somogyi puts it this way: Do you ever see plastic trim on finely made wooden furniture? No? Then why is it used on guitars?
Simple--it's much easier, and less labor intensive to use plastic. And the marketplace has come to accept that look. I think it's a purely aesthetic consideration, nothing to do with tone. I agree with Tim, wood glues to wood better than plastic glues to wood. And wood bindings look a lot more elegant, IMO. |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
I detest any plastic, ivoroid, etc on a guitar. Give me WOOD!!! Not saying it sounds better, just personal preference. I've also heard that an abalone top purf (in some folks minds) makes a better sounding guitar because it "decouples" the top from the binding, or something like that.......not sure about that one
__________________
"One small heart, and a great big soul that's driving" Last edited by fitness1; 12-25-2010 at 04:12 PM. |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Fiction.
No one is complaining about ivoroid on my guitars. I really wouldn't say its easier, just a different set of tricks. You cannot make a vintage instrument without ivoroid. It is the only replacement for ivory as far as I know. It's also more resistant to dings. Bolteron is another story. I don't use it. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
I would not say that gluing more permanently is a great virtue for wood bindings. Certainly not from a repair perspective. It's almost always possible to peel off and later glue back plastic binding. Wood binding often has to be destroyed to be removed. But the binding has to stay on until you want it removed, and bolteron (hard vinyl) is notoriously difficult to glue. They say the name came from the best means of attachment. Wood has the virtue of being a natural material and looking like wood (unless it's ebony). I'm not sure if plastic hurts the sound--it has more damping than most woods, but it doesn't seem to hurt 1930's Martins a lot. On the other hand, I am very confident that wood doesn't hurt it.
__________________
"Still a man hears what he wants to hear, and disregards the rest." --Paul Simon Last edited by Howard Klepper; 12-26-2010 at 02:00 PM. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Did you ask Ervin how the furniture sounds?
__________________
Go for the Tone, George |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Biggest difference (plastic vs wood binding) in my experience is the durability. All my wood-bound guitars have small indentations/creases where I've accidently thumped the edge of my guitar against some harder (i.e. tables, chair backs, boom stands, keyboards, etc). The two plastic-bound guitars fared much better as they were better able to withstand the occasional collision without any visible mark.
__________________
What I Sometimes Play |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
So not only is wooden binding a bit more vulnerable to getting dented, it's also more likely to get a bit grubby-looking unless you're ever-vigilant and take it in to get spot lacquer shot over any place where the original finish has flaked off. As for any difference in tone, my understanding is that some builders believe it has a (very minor) effect, others don't buy that. I think that would depend on whether the guitar has been constructed so that the top is isolated from the back and sides, or not. Hope that makes sense. Wade Hampton Miller |