![]() |
|
View Poll Results: Which do you prefer? | |||
VTS |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
31 | 48.44% |
Non-VTS |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
10 | 15.63% |
They sound different but I like qualities about both |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
19 | 29.69% |
I don't hear much/any difference |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
4 | 6.25% |
Voters: 64. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You're welcome and thank you all for sharing your opinions.
__________________
14-day Return Period -No restocking fee Maury's Music PODCASTS View actual pics of ALL in-stock guitars Martin Guitar Certified Online Dealer Martin Blueridge |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Any more voters?
__________________
14-day Return Period -No restocking fee Maury's Music PODCASTS View actual pics of ALL in-stock guitars Martin Guitar Certified Online Dealer Martin Blueridge |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I preferred the VTS by an extremely small margin. Both sounded fine.
__________________
Martin HD-28, Guild JF30, Yamaha FG720S, Yamaha CPX700-12, old Alvarez (?) nylon string "May you stay forever young."-Dylan |
#19
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I preferred the VTS somewhat. This may sound strange but, to me, it had a little less of the characteristic rosewood sound and leaned a bit toward a mahogany sound, which I like. But the differences weren't huge and I can certainly understand why someone would prefer the non-VTS. I did prefer the color of the VTS over the yellowish non-VTS top, but that wouldn't hold much sway in an actual purchasing situation.
__________________
Bob DeVellis |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The difference is well within the kind of variation you can hear within a single model to me.
So, can I really say the difference I hear is VTS vs Non-VTS? I don't know.
__________________
Martin D41 (2004) with chrome Waverly tuners Martin 000-28EC Martin CEO-7 Basic Fender mandolin Kalii concert uke, mahogany |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Listening through my AKG K240 headphones I heard a clearly discernable difference between the two. For my tastes I much preferred the VTS. More complex, woody and sweet sounding throughout the range. Even a subtle vibrato sound in the trebles with the VTS like the voice of a great singer. By the way, I had chance recently to play a non-VTS Martin Authentic 28 and thought it was a fine guitar.
__________________
AKA 'Screamin' Tooth Parker' You can listen to Walt's award winning songs with his acoustic band The Porch Pickers @ the Dixie Moon album or rock out electrically with Rock 'n' Roll Reliquary Bourgeois AT Mahogany D Gibson Hummingbird Martin J-15 Voyage Air VAD-04 Martin 000X1AE Squier Classic Vibe 50s Stratocaster Squier Classic Vibe Custom Telecaster PRS SE Standard 24 |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Would take either but if I had to choose with price not an issue it would be based on wood.
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I preferred the non-VTS model.
For me...rounder, fuller, warmer, more earthy/organic sounding all strings, and all playing positions. The VTS is a tad brighter, dryer, cleaner sounding...but for me...a bit more sterile sounding because of that...but it might also have a bit more "cut" in a group because of all of that. The low E bass response in the all important first and second positions was better, to me, on the non-VTS...better...looser, rounder, fuller...like the Six Million Dollar Man...better, stronger, faster... On the whole...I think the VTS topped guitars might be a better way to go for the Bluegrass band players, with that brighter, dryer, cleaner sound. In person, I do think the VTS does make the guitar sound more vintage to some degrees...but not in others...but again...in a band, or group setting, I think it really would be the way to go. I think solo singer-songwriter style...the non VTS is the way to go for sure, and it could still work well in a band setting, depending on the particular guitar, and the surrounding overall tonal umbrella of the group en masse' Best Regards duff |
![]() |
|
Tags |
martin authentic, martin vts, maurysmusic, vintage tone system |
Thread Tools | |
|