#1
|
|||
|
|||
K&K Mini vs. D-Tar Sadducer
I have an inexpensive, but great sounding OM style guitar with no electronics, and I wanted to install a simple, minimally invasive pickup that (hopefully) doesn't require a separate preamp. Will be using for low level coffeehouse gigs, running through one or two of the little Roland Cube Monitors. I've heard that the K&K Mini sounds very natural, but can have feedbacks issues. (Which shouldn't be a problem for my low level stuff) There are a lot of negative feelings out there about Under Saddle Transducers being brittle & quacky, but I've heard good things about the D-Tar Sadducers. I'm a hybrid (pick & fingers) player, playing chords and single note solos in a duo with a singer/songwriter guitarist, so I tend to play all over the neck. By the way, I don't think I'd like a soundhole pickup, as they seem to get in the way of my picking. Any suggestions?
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
The D-tar sadducer is old technology. A more modern solution would be a D-tar Wavelength, or the Wavelength with the added internal microphone. (I don't remember what it's called) Alot of people around here really like the K&K's. I've installed a bunch of them, and for the most part people have been happy with them. K&K PWM's, or pretty much any other SBT doesn't suit my playing style. I kinda semi plant my pinky, and a SBT picks this up like a bad drummer. My personal guitars that have electronics have Wavelengths. If I need to plug in a guitar without electronics I use a LR Baggs M1. I use a Fishman Pro EQ Platinum with all of them.................except when I add an external mic to the blend. Then I use a Highlander EDB-1 to blend the mic and pickup.
Confusing, ain't it
__________________
woody b politically incorrect since 1964 |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Last edited by Robert H.; 12-05-2010 at 12:53 PM. |