|
|
#1
09-25-2023, 09:06 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Martin 000-18 Modern Deluxe
I have been considering a 000-18. I haven't played any Modern Deluxe yet. Any owners? Experiences with this model? Thoughts?
https://manchestermusicmill.com/mart...nterior-x8577/ 
|
|
#2
09-25-2023, 02:46 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
No ideas on this model ... but the Modern Deluxe D-28's are a version of their dread's that I wanted to play .... not a fan of the "classic" "vintage" unbalanced Boom-THUD sounds so many enthuse about ... so maybe it'll be an interesting alternative?
|
|
#3
09-25-2023, 03:01 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
You get a pretty good package of upgrades for a good price. The question is if it's the sound you want. Some good discussion here:
https://www.acousticguitarforum.com/...+modern+deluxe
|
|
#4
09-25-2023, 06:33 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
I have a OM 28 Modern Deluxe. I love it.
|
|
#5
09-25-2023, 07:15 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
__________________
Tommy Martin OM28 MD Martin HD-28 Gibson Les Paul R9 Fender Original 60's Telecaster Fender '52 RI Telecaster Marshall Plexi amp Victoria 5112 amp Fender 57 Custom Tweed Deluxe amp
|
|
#7
09-26-2023, 09:19 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I've played most of these models. I would say that, in general, the Modern Deluxe series sound a little brighter and more lively. The VTS Sitka top sounds good to my ears. The bracing is the same as GE bracing which is lighter than that what they build the standard series with. The carbon fiber bridge plate should make the guitar a little more stable, but also imparts a tone difference. They look lovely too.
The go/no go for many people is the neck. It is a very thin soft v asymmetrical shape. I loved the sound of the D-28 MD I purchased when they came out. I felt it was a step up over the standards, sounded awesome for my repertoire, and it amplified better than my Marquis. However, I didn't like the neck. It was too thin for me.
__________________
"Lift your head and smile at trouble. You'll find happiness someday."
|
|
#9
09-26-2023, 11:20 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
I don't think bright is the word. I have an OM-28MD. When I think bright, I think Taylor & Collings. The MDs still have the Martin tone, but maybe more clarity in the mid range, where Martins tend to get muddy. A little more volume & clarity.
Steve
__________________
"Naturally torrified, & unnaturally horrified, since 1954"
|
|
#11
09-26-2023, 01:03 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
My 000-28MD reminds me of a Martin and a Goodall combined.
I haven't played the 000-18MD but I am sure it's a great guitar as well.
__________________
Martin:1956 00-18, 1992 D-16H, 2013 HD-28, 2017 CEO-7, 2020 000-28 Modern Deluxe Santa Cruz OM/PW, Larrivee OM-03R, Taylor GS-Mini Mahogany, Taylor 356CE, Fender American Professional Stratocaster, MIM Telecaster, Gibson Les Paul Studio, Epiphone ES-339 Pro YouTube Channel | Listen to my stuff on Spotify/Apple Music
|
|
#12
09-26-2023, 07:40 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
If you think the ubiquitous Martin MLO neck is too thick, you'll love those on the MDs.
At least in my experience on a D28 MD, the neck carve was asymmetrical, meaning it was thicker on the bass side of the equator, and thinner on the south side. I frankly hated it; already not a fan of the MLO, this seemed thinner yet. For the record, I love the thicker U-shape neck on the 70's Martins, or at least the V-neck on a few different modern models.
__________________
Tom Martin Custom Authentic 000-28 1937 Martin 1944 00-18
|
