#1
|
|||
|
|||
EQing a mag pickup versus a piezo
Whats some of the general differences between the sound of a mag pickup versus the undersaddle piezo, when it comes to properly EQing them? I find with both, they sound better with some of the mids backed off. I also find mag's tend to need a little boost in bass and treble. What do you all find?
__________________
Gear: PRS Hollowbody II Piezo, Martin HPL 000, PRS Angelus A60E, Martin 000-15M |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
I've always thought that the mid cuts on mags needed to be a little lower than the mid cuts on piezo pickups, say the 600Hz to 800Hz range for mags and the 1KHz to 1.5KHz range for piezo pickups.
I'm beginning to have second thoughts about the Black Angel mag. I initially used a 660Hz cut with the Black Angel, but I'm now getting better results with a 1.2KHz cut. I honestly can't tell you if the need for that cut is more a function of the BA or the particular guitar its in. I just know that the 1.2KHz cut is sounding better to me. When I get the time, I'll be making some test recordings to double-check my findings with that rig. Luthier Dave Wendler invented a MagPi pickup system which passively combines a mag pickup with a piezo SBT. I owned one of his MagPi-equipped ElectroCoustic guitars for a year before I finally discovered that a cut at 3KHz worked best with it. It took so long to discover that because I had never before owned a guitar/pickup rig that needed a cut that high. These days I'm trying to have fewer preconceptions about what EQ adjustments are needed, and to let my ears be the guide. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
I think with either kind of pickup it helps to let go of any preconceptions about what your guitar ought to sound like, and work with what it actually does sound like. And we're talking damage control here -- you want the least-bad version of your current reality.
Also, I think it helps to be mindful of your audience and what they came for. They're there for music, and they'll probably like your music better if your instrument's sound fits in well with your voice and/or bandmates. The butts in the seats really don't care whether or not your guitar sounds like an accurately-amplified version of its acoustic self. Except for that one guy with his arms folded who can't stop staring at your fingers. And he's probably reading this. :-) |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
HOWEVER, with my Black Angel Piezo & Mag, I EQ it a little differently. Using my Pendulum SPS-1, I notch out 60hz on the piezo SBT, set a somewhat wide Q on the midrange and cut around 700hz, and then (with a med-width Q) boost the highs around 5khz. On the mag, I boost the bass around 150hz (I think) cut the mids a little around 280-300hz and then again around 1.5khz as that gets the mud and honk out of the way and lets the best bass and treble frequencies complement the piezo. So, I've found, like Guitaniac, that there's room for the nasal freqs to come out of a mag and that EQ is not exclusive to USTs. As a matter of fact, I think the mystical Sunrise buffer box not only amplifies and buffers the signal, but widely scoops the midrange and enhances the bass and treble. They say it accesses the "coupling" feature unique to the Sunrise but that EQ is, kinda, generically "acoustic" sounding as it is. The EQ I apply to the BA is similar and I don't think it's coincidence that some really like the Buffer box with the BA.
__________________
Alvarez MC90 Guild GAD-50 w/Seymour Duncan Mag Mic Taylor 352ce Taylor 514ce Zoom AC3 https://linktr.ee/erikjmusic |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
I cannot compare mag vs (ust) piezo, but I definitely eq mag and sbt's differently.
My JJB's usually need a cut in the bass and a boost in the treble, my mags (DeArmond ToneBoss and SD woodyl XL) need a boost in the bass and cut in the trebles - this is morer exaggerated on the DeaArmond than the SD. I expect it varies a lot depending on the pickup being used as well as the guitar it's mated to.
__________________
Roy Ibanez, Recording King, Gretsch, Martin G&L, Squier, Orange (x 2), Bugera, JBL, Soundcraft Our duo website - UPDATED 7/26/19 |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
I always end up cutting the mids a bit, regardless of pickup. My Baggs M1A is no exception, but it never needs more bass or treble. It should be noted, too, that not all magnetic pickups are equal.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
There are a plethora of great soundhole
pups out there. It used to be sunrise was the only decent mag out there. My current is the baggs m80. Something inside itvallows it to also pickup body resonance. Since i bought it ive pretty much given up on piezo ust/sbt type pickups. All just too unruley at loud bar volumes. I use to use a low cut around 200 on my kk. found 110 to 140 the sweet spot on the m80.I usually cut the muds at 700 and adj the q for the room.highs are cutoff at 8 to 10k usually bass boost a bit at 400. But its all subjective. ymmv |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
As Larry Fishman will tell you, the "quack" [a term he abhors] happens around 5-7k. If you have parametric, you'll want to pull that back.
__________________
David D. Berkowitz |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
I have been using a pretty narrow cut around 350-400 hz on my rare earth blend. I have tried cutting around 1.1 to 1.5k as well, but I feel like I'm better off cutting 350-400 hz.
__________________
Alvarez: DY61 Huss and Dalton: DS Crossroads, 00-SP Kenny Hill: Heritage, Performance Larrivee: CS09 Matt Thomas Limited Taylor: 314ce, 356e, Baritone 8 Timberline: T60HGc |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
This is it for me. I've never had a studio engineer or live sound-person or my sound guy ask me what pickup I had. They simply set levels for the guitar & environment so it sounded best. Preconceptions almost always lead to misconceptions.
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
It depends on how you judge. It is a habit of experience to steer towards a preconception and start from there. If that doesnt achieve the desired result broaden your spectrum. It is not a misconception. Anyway, your guitar is just the first variable in a chain. And sound/PA guys in general do not really care about guitars.
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Another thing to consider: all speakers have a resonance peak, usually 50 to 80Hz. The second harmonic (100-160Hz) can cause feedback issues (or an overly high resonance peak).So, depending on the system i use a para EQ, raise the volume and sweep to find the culprit then drop the volume to minus. This is a pretty classic approach in general. Acoustic instruments resonate more than electric (vibrating top) so its a much bigger issue (but less so for a standard mag) but i even use it on the latter. And the guitar is just first in line in a chain. |