#1
|
|||
|
|||
Please help me with the choice of a budget acoustic archtop.
I am new to archtop guitars, but I always liked their looks and their "different" tone.
I'd like to purchase a brand new archtop guitar. to be used mainly acoustically i.e. not plugged in. I mainly play fingerstyle, and a bit of flatpicking. My three most important considerations are: 1) Good unplugged tone 2) A wide neck at the nut (possibly 1 3/4 but also a Gibson neck width (1.73) would be OK as long as string spacing at the nut is at least 36 mm 3) Affordable price (not exceeding $600/700). Can you help me with your suggestions? Thanks! Last edited by gerardo1000; 02-19-2019 at 12:25 PM. Reason: typo |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
How about "the Loar"?never played on though,if your on a tight budget that might be the ticket...
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
The Loars are very good "raw materials" instruments. Expect them to need a setup, add that as part of your budget.
The 600/700 series is all solid wood, sounds a good deal better than the 300 series, and there seems to be more care in the quality control department...a used 600 would fit your criteria nicely. Keep in mind, they do have a very "vintagy" V shaped neck. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
"To sit home, read one's favorite paper, and scoff at the misdeeds of the men who do things is easy, but it is markedly ineffective. It is what evil men count upon the good men's doing." T.Roosevelt |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Sound--that's more subjective. If you want that old school archtop sound for say, playing swing rhythm, the Loar is MUCH better. The Eastmans tend to follow the Benedetto aesthetic--a little quieter, a bit "nasal", but more polite sounding, in a way. They're not my bag, but someone who plays mostly flat top guitars might really like them as the tone won't be as much of a shock to the system. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
I thought it was the string spacing - it is spec'd at 1.75" but I think it's more like 1 11/16". My flat top (which I do find comfortable to play fingerstyle) is 1.75 but when holding them side by side I can see that the Loar nut is a tad narrower and the string spacing at the nut is also a bit closer. I then realised that the string spacing at the bridge is MUCH narrower. I replaced the top part of the bridge with wider spacing slots and it's much more comfortable now. I'd still like to adjust the spacing at the nut but that's a job for someone with more precision.
__________________
National Resophonic NRP 12 Fret Loar LH-700-VS Archtop Eastman E8-OM Herrmann Weissenborn Recording King RP-10 Recording King RG-35-SN Lapsteel Maton 425 12-string ESP 400 series telecaster Eastman T485 Deering Americana Banjo My Youtube |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Was there a price estimate given when Waterloo announced their archtops at NAMM?
__________________
-- Patience is a strength, not a weakness; and if by practicing patience we stop retaliating to harm and criticism, people will gradually come to understand that our real nature is very special. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
TMK no, but $3500 might not be out of the question...
__________________
"Mistaking silence for weakness and contempt for fear is the final, fatal error of a fool" - Sicilian proverb (paraphrased) |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
I was hoping for closer to $2500, but I guess when you take into account that it's still a carved archtop (just made to look like an old pressed top archie) $3500 is still a pretty good deal considering what a Collings branded archtop goes for!
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
My thoughts exactly, Jeff...
__________________
"Mistaking silence for weakness and contempt for fear is the final, fatal error of a fool" - Sicilian proverb (paraphrased) |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
The budge is extremely limiting, and probably limits you to a Loar - I had two , not bad sounding but very poor build quality, or, perhaps a Godin?
I am on my second Eastman and think they are great, but not within your budget. Frankly, if you know about guitars, then I'd say, look for an old Harmony! However, archtops are built to be driven hard, being essentially rhythm boxes, so not ideal for finger picking. This might help :
__________________
Silly Moustache, Just an old Limey acoustic guitarist, Dobrolist, mandolier and singer. I'm here to try to help and advise and I offer one to one lessons/meetings/mentoring via Zoom! |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
A Loar 600/700 would be good. Buy used so someone else has already done the fret and setup work for you. But these are definitely old-school guitars, as you would expect from what is essentially a late-20s L5 copy. And you have to like a beefy neck with a strong V (I do, despite my smallish hands).
I recently bought a used 700 on the Bay and other than the expected roughness in the f-holes and under the fingerboard extension there are NO QA issues - it’s very clean. But no, not at an Eastman level. But perfectly fine. I am delighted with the guitar. I also got it for the upper end of your budget, with an installed K&K Definity and external K&K preamp. I was the only bidder. Second time in 45 years of playing I’ve gotten lucky. (First time was a pair of like-new AKG 414B-ULS for €500). Steven |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
If you choose to go the Loar route - just check that the neck set enables a fair bridge height and keeps the tailpiece off the top.
__________________
Silly Moustache, Just an old Limey acoustic guitarist, Dobrolist, mandolier and singer. I'm here to try to help and advise and I offer one to one lessons/meetings/mentoring via Zoom! |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Steven |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
I would normally say Eastman but its double your budget.
It looks like Eastman is only offering the AR610 and the AR810 at this time.
__________________
"My opinion is worth every penny you paid for it." "If you try to play like someone else, Who will play like you". Quote from Johnny Gimble The only musician I have to impress today is the musician I was yesterday. No tubes, No capos, No Problems. |