![]() |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
McPherson Touring and Journey OF660
I’m looking for a small body guitar due to a bad shoulder injury. I tried to McPherson last week and loved it and felt it was very comfortable. However, I was slightly disappointed that the scale was as short as it was. I was then referred to the OF660 because of the larger scale length. The specs indicate the body is larger than a McPherson touring. However, with all the curvature and such I’m curious how it feels compared to the McPherson. I need something that will bring my shoulder in closer to my body. Can anyone give some input on body feel? Does a McPherson sit tighter and closer to the body? My primary concern is a smaller body because of my right shoulder injury. I suppose with the McPherson was the best fitting guitar I would except the fact that it’s 22.75 scale length and learn to use it. But would rather have a 24 inch or larger scale with roughly the same size body. I’ve watched a bunch of comparison videos, but no one really goes into depth about the body and how it fits. Every guy just wants to show off his skills lol thanks in advance. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I don't own, but have played both the OF660 and the Touring. I found the Touring to be more comfortable. Another suggestion: look around the used market to see if you can find a previous generation Emerald X7. It is a thinner, smaller body than the current X7, and is still the most comfortable acoustic guitar I've played. It has a 24" scale and is small enough that I can sit in an easy chair with it. There is very little arm extension for the right arm to get around the body.
Earl, who posts here, had two of that generation X7 - not sure if he sold one, but I recall him mentioning he was considering it. Besides the feel of it, I like the tone of that gen X7 better than the OF660 or the Touring. It has the offset soundhole facing forward as opposed to the current gen X7 that has the soundhole facing out and up... I prefer the current soundhole placement, but the body of the newest gen X7 is thicker... just thinking of comfort in this circumstance. Good luck with the search.
__________________
Some CF, some wood. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I played a Touring recently, when a new local friend brought her older Touring and new Kestrel over for show and tell. She tried our “extra” bubinga veneer X7 V2 (V2 = the older one that is more petite and has the forward facing sound hole) but Kimberly still liked her Touring better. V3 current generation X7 is not much smaller than the X20 overall but keeps the 24” scale length. I have no experience with those.
We also have an “extra” CA Cargo, and I like the 24” scale of the Emerald X7 better than the 22.75” scale of the Cargo, even though Cargo sounds really nice - nicer than such a small guitar should. My only OF660 experience was at Kramster’s house six years ago when we had a Phoenix carbon fest. I don’t recall much, but wasn’t looking for a travel guitar then. We were focused on other things that day. OF660 has a wedge and X7 has ergonomic bevels, FWIW. To judge comfort you’d almost need to play them side by side. Perhaps if Kramster sees this thread he can comment. He might even still have the guitars mentioned. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Just send a PM directly to Kramster while logged in. If you are on one of his posts, just click on his handle. If you are in the PM screen, just type in Kramster as the addressee. I sent yo a PM already with my contact info.
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I've never played a Touring, but I have an OF660, and have played an X-7. Of course it's hard for anyone but you to say what body shape/size comfortable. FWIW here is how the X-7, Touring and OF660 sizes compare:
3.jpg I aligned the low point of the waist of each guitar because that's about where it would sit on your knee, assuming you play seated. The blue line at the top is at the Touring's nut. You can see the X-7 would have roughly the same left-arm reach out to the nut. The OF660 is a little over an inch further away. So as far as the reach goes, the X7 and Touring would likely be about the same, even though the X7 has a larger scale length (24"). One thing that has been mentioned (see RaySach's posts) about the X7 is that the saddle sits pretty far back, which can make palm muting harder - if that would be an issue for you. I don't like a long reach to the nut either (though I don't have a severe shoulder injury). I find the Journey to be comfortable, maybe a wee bit neck heavy. Here's how the body sizes of the three compare: 3c.jpg One thing the Journey has going for it is a Manzer wedge: j.jpg which helps bring the body in closer to you. And it makes a fine travel guitar to boot. Good luck with the hunt. Last edited by KevinH; 10-14-2023 at 09:12 AM. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
I think Journey also has a generous return policy if you order directly from them. You'd also have more colors available. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
The difficult thing is finding an X7 to feel. |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Re trying an X7, have you looked in the two carbon fiber sharing threads - that many wish the mods would pin for reference? |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
For those interested I settled on an McPherson Touring. The Journey OF660 came yesterday, and I played with it all day. While the body of the guitar was extremely comfortable and really what I was looking for, I didn’t care for the feel of the neck. I understand it’s a D shape and have really grown accustomed to the Taylor neck, which, in my opinion, the McPherson feels very similar.
Overall, I was impressed with Journey considering it breaks down, but in reality, I don’t plan on traveling with it. I simply looked at it due to the specs. I think in a perfect world if this McPherson had a 24.75 scale I’d be in heaven but I’m gonna have to get used to the 22.75. As most of you know the Macpherson comes with medium 13s. Has anyone tried 12s? Due to the short scale would 12 be problematic? I know there’s several threads on this topic but I don’t think anyone truly answered whether or not they’re using 12s or lighter on such a short scale. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
I own the 2nd generation OF660 and have played the newer version (not the Kevin Michael version) of the Touring in a local shop more than a few times. GREAT guitar. You are spot on about the necks. I swore up and down that I was sold on a 1.75" nut for fingerstyle, but when I bought a Taylor Academy last year it changed my mind. No wonder people like Taylor necks so much, and I swear the Touring and Sable were designed with the Taylor feel in mind. Not to mention the feel of that composite satin. I think the McPherson necks may be the best necks I've ever hand in my hands period. I like the scale of the OF660 better though.
__________________
Don't chase tone. Make tone. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Daugela,
I use 12s on my McPherson Touring. I have no problems with them. Barb |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Any problems with drop D tuning? Too floppy?
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
That is the main reason I'm not opting for a touring. The shortened scale already makes the strings much more pliant and from what I've read, drop tunings don't work well on them. You could always up tune. In the 19th c, guitars with that short of a stringlength would be tuned to G instead of E.
|