#16
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#17
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
https://www.soundonsound.com/forum/viewforum.php?f=26 |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Set your input gains, all fader and master & monitor levels, and speaker/amp levels nominally, and EQ on the mast & monitor buses flat. Then, slowly raise the mains or monitor levels (you'll want to do them separately) until you start to hear feedback, then cut that frequency in the graphic EQ for that output bus. Experienced engineers can listen to the tone and know about where to cut; a real-time analyzer makes it super-simple because it shows you the offending frequency right there! Keep pushing the levels until more frequencies feed back, then duck those as well. When you think you've now got all the headroom you'll need, bring levels back to nominal. You do have to push the system to the point of feedback, so with people in the room, you need to go very slowly and be ready to back of quickly so you can hear/see the feedback frequency, but not let it get so loud it hurts people's ears. But you can do it. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
I find for the most part they are just ok. i prefer to use outboard eq and effects. the tm are kinda meh. to my ears anyway. So why buy the thing. most of the features are buried deep. Only a dedicated sound tech would be able to use them live. The preamps are weak and mud sounding. Sorry im just not a fan. As for the qsc. I just find the originals are more musical. They seem to my ear to.have a different crossover point. and the k.2 seems harsher when pushed.More fatiguing on the ears after a full night. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|