The Acoustic Guitar Forum

Go Back   The Acoustic Guitar Forum > General Acoustic Guitar and Amplification Discussion > Archtops

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 06-30-2009, 09:00 AM
random works random works is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Georgia
Posts: 2,743
Default archtop musing

On the Antiques Road Show program, a lady had a Gibson archtop made in the 30's. The expert said the archtops were developed to give great volume in order for the guitar to compete with other instruments and that the advent of electric guitars diminished the demand for archtops. Are good archtops really that powerful? Is it that archtops are better a projecting a certain sound spectrum. This is just a question, no related any desire for an archtop.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-15-2009, 09:14 PM
wierdOne wierdOne is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: pensacola florida
Posts: 591
Default

yes... If it is built correctly... it will be measurably louder than the loudest flat top guitars in the mid range..... or so they* say...


they*: The infamous they.
__________________
Tuxedo Tele, RdHoo Archtop

me
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-15-2009, 09:21 PM
george wilson george wilson is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Near Williamsburg,Va.
Posts: 94
Default

Archtops have a sharper tone than flat tops;more treble,less bass. I think this helps their sound to carry better.

The best sounding archtop I ever tried was an old 16" Gibson L5 from the early period. It was $3000.00,and not in very good shape for playing. Strings were too high. But,it sounded like plucking a cello. I wasn't in the mood to spend that much money,but it was very unique even among other old L5's.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-15-2009, 09:30 PM
wierdOne wierdOne is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: pensacola florida
Posts: 591
Default

Archtops are wonderful instruments... depending on what they're designed to do, they can respond VERY much like an acoustic flat top guitar... or punch through a big band acoustically...

or... give you that warm woody tone when amplified.....


it's all in how you build them... arch height, bracing pattern, finish, and top/back thickness can all radically alter the acoustic response/volume of an archtop...
__________________
Tuxedo Tele, RdHoo Archtop

me
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-16-2009, 03:51 AM
Howard Emerson Howard Emerson is offline
AGF Sponsor
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Huntington Station, New York
Posts: 7,620
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by random works View Post
On the Antiques Road Show program, a lady had a Gibson archtop made in the 30's. The expert said the archtops were developed to give great volume in order for the guitar to compete with other instruments and that the advent of electric guitars diminished the demand for archtops. Are good archtops really that powerful? Is it that archtops are better a projecting a certain sound spectrum. This is just a question, no related any desire for an archtop.
Random,
Yes, they are that powerful, and can have all the sustain and fullness of a flat top, at times.

Listen to my 1927 Gibson L-5 on 'Nokie's Blue Bottle', solo bottleneck, or straight fingerpicked on 'Dust Mop':

http://www.howardemerson.com/music1.html

Regards,
Howard
http://www.howardemerson.com/
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-16-2009, 08:18 AM
wcap wcap is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 4,414
Default

I really have to stay away from this forum.....

I don't want to have lustful thoughts for yet another type of guitar! (I've already only narrowly escaped being obsessed by 12 strings and dobros!....and I've thus far avoided an archtop obsession, but only just barely.....and this thread is not helping matters!)
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-16-2009, 08:29 AM
Glennwillow Glennwillow is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Coastal Washington State
Posts: 45,117
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wcap View Post
I really have to stay away from this forum.....

I don't want to have lustful thoughts for yet another type of guitar! (I've already only narrowly escaped being obsessed by 12 strings and dobros!....and I've thus far avoided an archtop obsession, but only just barely.....and this thread is not helping matters!)
Yeah, isn't it amazing how this forum will get you lusting after something you didn't even know you wanted?

By the way, I do have a relatively inexpensive archtop Guild with pickups on it. It sounds good amplified but it's useless acoustically because the top is made of maple plywood.

Regards, Glenn
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-16-2009, 08:56 AM
wierdOne wierdOne is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: pensacola florida
Posts: 591
Default

sorry guys... but put your GAS masks on:


Here's a fellow named Doug Wamble playing this guitar:

here's another recording of him playing it... with phosphor bronze strings on the same guitar...

__________________
Tuxedo Tele, RdHoo Archtop

me

Last edited by wierdOne; 09-16-2009 at 09:28 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-16-2009, 09:14 AM
unclrob unclrob is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Tallahassee Fla.
Posts: 150
Default

I own several Gibson and Epiphone archtops and love em.Great for playing blues,old timy jazz from the 20's and 30's,western swing.I used them as lead instruments with flattop rythm players.A lot more versitile then most give them credit for.
__________________
My tools-Larrivee OM03PA and J05,72 Harmony made Fender 12 string,Guild JF30 6+12,Stagg E/A,Guild Starfire bass,a couple of Tele's,65 Gibson L48 and a 49 L7,mando,balzuki,a couple of Gretsch's,72 Fender Princton Reverb,Ultra Sound AC30 and a bunch of other toys.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-16-2009, 12:50 PM
mellowman mellowman is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Bend, OR
Posts: 485
Default

I find a lot of variation in volume in archtops, but it seems to me the good ones can be louder than an average flat top, at least in part because you can play them harder without breaking up. Of course, you need to really whomp on it to get that volume. My understanding is that Freddie Green used very high action and heavy strings, combined with a strong attack to get the volume to hang with the band.
__________________
Steve
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 09-16-2009, 01:32 PM
Howard Emerson Howard Emerson is offline
AGF Sponsor
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Huntington Station, New York
Posts: 7,620
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mellowman View Post
I find a lot of variation in volume in archtops, but it seems to me the good ones can be louder than an average flat top, at least in part because you can play them harder without breaking up. Of course, you need to really whomp on it to get that volume. My understanding is that Freddie Green used very high action and heavy strings, combined with a strong attack to get the volume to hang with the band.
Speaking of Freddie Green
........http://www.freddiegreen.org/instruments/setup.html

A manly man's set up, for certain!

HE
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 09-16-2009, 06:54 PM
mellowman mellowman is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Bend, OR
Posts: 485
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Howard Emerson View Post
Speaking of Freddie Green
........http://www.freddiegreen.org/instruments/setup.html

A manly man's set up, for certain!

HE
Yup Howard. He must have been quite the manly man to play with that setup! Don't think I could pull that off...
__________________
Steve
Reply With Quote
Reply

  The Acoustic Guitar Forum > General Acoustic Guitar and Amplification Discussion > Archtops






All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:30 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, The Acoustic Guitar Forum
vB Ad Management by =RedTyger=