#1
|
|||
|
|||
Question about tops
Merry Xmas to all of you:
What do you think about Bubinga as a top tonewood?
__________________
-2017 Gibson J-45 Standard -2019 Gibson J-15 -2019 Gibson Les Paul Junior -2020 Gibson Les Paul Special -2019 Gibson Les Paul Studio -2021 Fender Aerodyne Special Telecaster -2022 Fender Telecaster 50s (Vintera) -1994 Fender Telecaster Deluxe 70 (Vintera) -Sire V5 5-string |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
About one step up from cement. You asked....
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
I don't think I've ever seen a Bubinga topped guitar before. I've played a Larrivee with Bubinga back/sides a few times and it was a great guitar.
Have you seen a guitar with Bubinga top or are you just inquiring? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
I think it sounds great when paired with a spruce back and an emaciated player.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
I own one. An Ovation S868 Elite Special. Apparently, a very special edition, I might add. I find it delivers a very unique tone and a great projection for a super shallow guitar
__________________
-2017 Gibson J-45 Standard -2019 Gibson J-15 -2019 Gibson Les Paul Junior -2020 Gibson Les Paul Special -2019 Gibson Les Paul Studio -2021 Fender Aerodyne Special Telecaster -2022 Fender Telecaster 50s (Vintera) -1994 Fender Telecaster Deluxe 70 (Vintera) -Sire V5 5-string |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Explain. User? Listener? Owner?
__________________
-2017 Gibson J-45 Standard -2019 Gibson J-15 -2019 Gibson Les Paul Junior -2020 Gibson Les Paul Special -2019 Gibson Les Paul Studio -2021 Fender Aerodyne Special Telecaster -2022 Fender Telecaster 50s (Vintera) -1994 Fender Telecaster Deluxe 70 (Vintera) -Sire V5 5-string |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
__________________
-2017 Gibson J-45 Standard -2019 Gibson J-15 -2019 Gibson Les Paul Junior -2020 Gibson Les Paul Special -2019 Gibson Les Paul Studio -2021 Fender Aerodyne Special Telecaster -2022 Fender Telecaster 50s (Vintera) -1994 Fender Telecaster Deluxe 70 (Vintera) -Sire V5 5-string |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Looks like it might have a lot of headroom. |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
Bubinga has an density of 890 kg/m3 and a stiffness of 18.41 GPa. In comparison, Norway Spruce has a density of 405 kg/m3 and a stiffness of 9.70 GPa. So you have a wood that is twice a dense and stiff as spruce, you would need to take it to wafer thin thickness to get it to move efficiently given the energy available in the strings (much thinner than it is taken for a back or side).
On second thought, Charles said it best...
__________________
A bunch of nice archtops, flattops, a gypsy & nylon strings… |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Except, the clip posted above your post shows this theory to be wrong.
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
It does make me wonder though about Mahogany which is a much more commonly used tonewood for acoustic guitar tops. iim7V7IM7, how does the specs for mahogany match up to the efficiency of spruce? Would it also have to be wafer thin (in theory)? |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Not really. Just because a top is heavy does not mean it will not produce sound. It just needs to be driven harder. One of the selling features of the guitar is that it can be used in a live context with less concern about feedback where a responsive guitar may cause some issues. Different tools for different jobs. Is the audio coming from a mic or from the onboard electronics? Doesn't say in the video. Sounds to me like it is from the guitar pickup. But then again I am not familiar with the sound of Ovations.
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
A bunch of nice archtops, flattops, a gypsy & nylon strings… |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Surprisingly, mahogany , as far as stiffness goes when compared to spruce, has a lower stiffness coefficient. A mahogany top is usually thinned to equal if not greater thickness than a comparable sitka top.
|
|
Tags |
back, bubinga, sides, tone, top |
Thread Tools | |
|