#16
|
|||
|
|||
This thread reminds me how much I love my Touring and wish they made a 12 string.... Now GASing for the NEW Emerald x7-12... Have owned the little Amicus but was wishing for a full-scaled smaller 12string ... here we go again... !!!
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
I am a bit concerned about some of the discussion regarding wolf tones and a few other issues with Emerald guitars. McPherson seems to have manufacturing down to the most minute detail and I have not heard of any such reports. My other concern about Emerald is that when I try one, I may develop a serious case of GAS. I am currently very satisfied with my collection, so that would "upset the apple cart" a bit. As for Rainsong, I think they make fine guitars, but I could never get used to that neck so I never GASsed for one. Tony |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
I loved my RainSong and sometimes find missing certain aspects about it. I also got into CF through a Shorty. It was loud, clear, comfortable and punchy- just like a good OM should be. However, what lured me even more is the 000 scale based off of Martin designs. That is where I first discovered my preference for shorter scale and why I asked McPherson if they ever would make a "tweener" guitar.
I sure hope that McPherson isn't done extending their CF line but if I had to put money on a prediction I would say that they are as the CF Series is not the bread and butter of the company. Curious though if McPherson is happy with the turnout of their CF Series? Can you imagine the sound if McPherson did a 12 string? |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Funny you should ask.... I called about a 12 string CF and they said they had no plans. They have all the orders they can fill with the current lineup :-)
I did play a 12 string version of their wood guitar and it was amazing!!! Just 12k. .... That kind of killed any hopes of owning one .... :-0 |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Your sentiment is understandable. The tone, the craftsmanship... my Sable is high art completely independent of materials.
I've only owned mine for a couple weeks and just one gig so far, but I'm wholly smitten. Its price was dear as well. I now have no need for my Martin CEO7 and intend to sell it.
__________________
Website: http://www.buzzardwhiskey.com |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
If McPherson ever makes a CF guitar based on the full size MG model I might be very tempted.
__________________
Emerald X30 Emerald X20 Nylon Emerald X7 Nylon Rainsong Smokey SMH Outdoor Guitalele Taylor 522e 12-fret ✝ Gitane DG-560 nylon ✝ Alhambra 3C CW Eastman AR910CE Recording King RM-991 tricone resonator Recording King RK-G25 6-string banjo Thomann Irish Bouzouki M1089 |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Some years ago, I owned a McPherson MG model. That was when the wood guitars were much more affordable. Unfortunately, the guitar was too large to be comfortable and I finally sold it.
Then, the Camrielle model was introduced, which is essentially a smaller version of the NG model. At that point, I wasn't going to spend that kind of money again, but certainly wished these had been available earlier. The Sable is the CF version of the wood Camrielle model, so it was a no-brainer for me. The workmanship on their wood models is flawless with amazing attention to the smallest detail. Their CF models have that same attention to detail at a much lower price point. No wolf tones, bubbles in the finish or any other oddities - just a flawless instrument. Tony |
#23
|
||||
|
||||
Just sent you a PM, Tony.
__________________
Martin 0-16NY Emerald Amicus Emerald X20 Cordoba Stage Some of my tunes: https://youtube.com/user/eatswodo |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
|
#25
|
|||
|
|||
To the OP - I hear you - In January of this year I played a CF guitar for the first time, and I've been ruined ever since - and I'm in a very small minority of individuals who actually prefer the tone of CF over most wood guitars - for my fingerstyle there is a balance in the wound and unwound strings that I haven't found in 99% of the wood guitars I've played. The Sable is indeed my favorite. But I am old school and I do want to get a wood guitar that can measure up, and I think I'm getting very close - those Larrivee 12 fret dreads are really great.
|
#26
|
|||
|
|||
I get your sentiment, with a Sable being your first acoustic. That’s a heck of a first acoustic, if I must say so.
I’ve owned (and currently own) a lot of guitars. As far as CF goes, I’ve owned Rainsong, Emerald and two McPhersons (one Kevin Michael Sable and one McPherson Sable). Of all the CFs I’ve owned and played, the Sable beats them all. With that said, Emerald and Rainsong are fantastic guitars as well. I would also agree the Sable would blow the Taylor out of the water (for what I like in an acoustic). I don’t think high end Taylors are even comparable. I own a wooden McPherson as well. A 5.0XP with Rosewood back and sides and a Redwood top. It’s in the $10k plus range. It’s not $7k better sounding than the Sable. Is it better? Yes. $7k better? No. The Sable is an amazing guitar. It’s the woodiest sounding CF that I’ve played. Would I get rid of my wood guitars for just CF? No. But it’s an incredible tool to have in the arsenal. I would recommend trying out Collings, Santa Cruz, Goodall, Lowden, etc. I think playing them you’ll see a bigger difference. While Taylor makes a great guitar, I don’t think their high end guitars are really their bread and butter. A $3k Taylor is about the same as a $5k Taylor to me in terms of sound and feel. That’s not the case for a $5k Santa Cruz (if you can even find them for that cheap anymore). Nevertheless, congrats on a great first acoustic guitar! |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Thanks for the recommendations...and the insight. WRT the 3k Taylor vs. the 5k....I agree. There were several 3k-range Taylors in the shop that day, and while the more expensive one was aesthetically more pleasing to look at...there was not a lot of difference in the way they played (at least that I could tell...I do not consider myself to be an expert guitar player so admittedly, there could be nuances about each that my fingers just could not feel). Would love to try an Emerald and some of the other higher end models you mentioned...because I think they are beautiful and would be interested in the differences to what I have become accustomed to. I feel incredibly fortunate to have been able to choose the Sable as my first / only acoustic. I know it isn't the route most players follow, but I can honestly say without a doubt this guitar has facilitated my growth as a musician. It seems a shame when we have to justify the cost of a well-made instrument, especially since (in my journey) it was the catalyst for unlocking techniques and tones I know I would have struggled with on a lesser guitar. It inspired and spurred me to practice more, and rewarded that practice with results that made me happy and more confident...and made my wife actually say she was glad I made that choice. For me, that experience of overcoming the limitations and focusing on expression really kind of sums up what music is all about. |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Honestly, I think the absolute best value for an acoustic guitar in the whole market is the McPherson Sable. You can get a used one for around $2500 (or at least the last time I looked). I have not played a better guitar for the money. Larrivee is probably the closest you can get. The Sable is an amazing guitar. I think the pickup system leaves a little too much quack. But man, that guitar is killer. Emeralds are good guitars, too. They have a different sound though. Not so “woody”, like the Sable. Same for Rainsongs. They’re all fantastic. CFs are so consistent. The Sable is just so warm, which is a criticism I’ve heard of a lot of CF guitars. I think the high end Taylors are really pretty guitars, but their sound is not massively different than the cheaper ones, especially for the premium. I played with two guys who had Taylors- one with an 800 series and one with a 400. I think they sound exactly the same. The 800 is prettier and feels a little better. But not for the price, to my hands and ears. |