#1
|
|||
|
|||
EAE Stompmix 4 alternatives
Hi guys, this is my first post here.
I'm a singer-songwriter and recently invested in a Fishman Rare Earth blend to better capture some of the percussive elements in my playing. I read some posts about the Elite Acoustics Stompmix on here with mixed feelings. It seems like an interesting piece of gear for me to combine my magnetic, mic and potentially on-board piezo signal to make a perfect stereo mix which I could feed to the sound guy. I could even add my vocal mic and have complete control over the mix in a small package. Now before I pull the trigger on this I'm looking into the alternatives. Here's what I found so far and I'd love to hear your perspective: 1) Bose T4S: more I/O options, more expensive and bulkier. Possibly overkill with respect to features? 2) A small analog mixer with onboard FX (Mackie, Behringer,...): Cheaper but lacks some functions and bulkier, probably more I/O options 3) A dedicated acoustic guitar preamp which allows to combine multiple signals: dedicated to acoustic guitars with all sorts of sonic options but limited to two signals and generally doesn't allow panning the signals. What do you experts on here think? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
You have to know that only 2 inputs have gain. The other 2 are line-level inputs. Combining * magnetic, * mic and * potentially on-board piezo * Vocal mic makes four inputs with gain required! not two! Here is a quote fro Sweetwater Knowledge Base Quote:
__________________
Martin 00-18V Goldplus + internal mic (2003) Martin OM-28V + HFN + internal mic (1999) Eastman E6OM (2019) Trance Audio Amulet Yamaha FGX-412 (1998) Gibson Les Paul Standard 1958 Reissue (2013) Fender Stratocaster American Vintage 1954 (2014) http://acousticir.free.fr/ |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Just to clarify, I'm using a Fishman Rare Earth blend and Godin Quantum built-in piezo system. Both are active pickup systems although the Rare Earth doesn't have a volume control (only blend). I figured that the piezo could go into the line input and the magnetic Fishman too since it's the 'hotter' of the two Fishman signals. The Fishman mic and optional vocal mic (after passing through a TC Helicon vocal effects pedal could go in the mic inputs. Would you think this could work? For larger gigs I intend to use my Kemper Profiler for fx and amp and cab simulation. Sending the magnetic Fishman pickup to the input and blending in the mic and piezo as a stereo loop into the KPA after having processed and blended those two signals in the Stompmix (both mic inputs could be used). I'd then send the Kemper stereo out to the board and my vocals directly from my fx pedal also stereo out to the board. I've tested this with my old, large and bulky analog mixer to blend the mic and piezo before going to the KPA and it works like a charm. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
So that's a different setup than I first
thought. You want to split the mag/mic signal and blend the mic feed with the piezo?? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
I am not sure it would work. It's not because a system is active that it actually amplifies the signal to line level.
Many "active preamps" are actually buffers with 0dB gain because the voltage produced by a piezo is already at instrument level but with inappropriate impedance. The buffer is just there to match the impedance. They might amplify but not at line-level... For example, a guitar with a PRO +4dB line level output would probably overdrive most commerical acoustic amps on the market. Especially since so many acoustic amps have no gain pots nowadays with fixed input gain stages. If you use a TC pedal for the mic, it might have a line level output (ex: TC play acoustic) that you could plug into one the line level input of the stompmi4. Then you have 2 gain inputs that can be dedicated to the piezo & the mag pickup. In this cas you would be left with one line level input unused....
__________________
Martin 00-18V Goldplus + internal mic (2003) Martin OM-28V + HFN + internal mic (1999) Eastman E6OM (2019) Trance Audio Amulet Yamaha FGX-412 (1998) Gibson Les Paul Standard 1958 Reissue (2013) Fender Stratocaster American Vintage 1954 (2014) http://acousticir.free.fr/ |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Another option is a used BOSE T1 mixer or NOS as many stores still have this older model.
It has 4 channels, with XLR - 1/4" combo jacks on each channel, phantom power, great EQ and FX, and savable scenes. I bought one just because I have to use certain Bose systems at one of my house gigs, and despite me not really liking the sound of many Bose products, I fell in love with this little mixer! You can set different effects for every channel and surprisingly, the FX sound pretty good! And it has direct outs on every channel for recording! Or for sending individual channels to a house soundman! Check the reviews and you'll see many people feel the same way about! But if you do buy the T1, you will need the companion power supply unless used with a BOSE L1 system. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
I had the T1, it's a mono unit. It was meant for the Bose L1 that is mono.
__________________
Martin 00-18V Goldplus + internal mic (2003) Martin OM-28V + HFN + internal mic (1999) Eastman E6OM (2019) Trance Audio Amulet Yamaha FGX-412 (1998) Gibson Les Paul Standard 1958 Reissue (2013) Fender Stratocaster American Vintage 1954 (2014) http://acousticir.free.fr/ |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Interesting, how would you compare the two with respect to the other features (fx, EQ)? And could you not make a 'L' mix for the aux output and an 'R' mix for the main out to create a stereo signal?
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
I remember clearly that I liked a lot the T1 and was ready to sell the Bose L1mII without but the guy who bought my L1mII really wanted the T1 so I let it go... I think I like the EAE better But Mostly because it is so small and easy to use. However at the time I had the L1 I did not have the understanding about tone, EQ, frequencies... it was before the IR quest so my ears were not trained by Doug Young’s feedback yet! So I remember getting lost in the EQ menu and struggling With frequency, gain and Q to get what I wanted. you can not really go wrong with each but I am not sure either of them will do what you want...
__________________
Martin 00-18V Goldplus + internal mic (2003) Martin OM-28V + HFN + internal mic (1999) Eastman E6OM (2019) Trance Audio Amulet Yamaha FGX-412 (1998) Gibson Les Paul Standard 1958 Reissue (2013) Fender Stratocaster American Vintage 1954 (2014) http://acousticir.free.fr/ |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
For sure Bose T4S covers most people needs. Most digital mixers don't have proper gain knobs unlike Bose Tonematch mixers.
__________________
Martin 00-18V Goldplus + internal mic (2003) Martin OM-28V + HFN + internal mic (1999) Eastman E6OM (2019) Trance Audio Amulet Yamaha FGX-412 (1998) Gibson Les Paul Standard 1958 Reissue (2013) Fender Stratocaster American Vintage 1954 (2014) http://acousticir.free.fr/ |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Also a singer/songwriter solo act. I purchased the StompMix4 and it has surpassed my expectations. It is a fantastic sounding little mixer, and tone shaping and effects sound very good. I liked it so much I sold my larger Alto Live. Beyond just its portability, it is just a very versatile and great sounding piece of gear.
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Behringer Flow 8
|
|
Tags |
elite acoustics, stompmix 4 |
|