Rainsong Guitars

[Kindness]

Just curious what everyone thinks of this carbon fiber guitar:

http://www.rainsong.com

Now I owned a carbon fiber clarinet. As I am in outside sales, it was great, because I didn't have to worry at all about weather, and could keep it in the car on the day of my lessons. It has had an incredible sound.

Curious if anyone owns a rainsong...one thing lost for sure is the beauty of wood, no doubt, and something tells me that with a guitar, there simply has to be some loss in rich sound.

Lisa
A&L Cedar GT

[astrummer]

Not sure which you would prefer ( wood prefer?) but I think that if you get the chance try a Composite Acoustics guitar which is also carbon fiber. I have had a chance to A/B them against some Rainsongs at Elderly instruments several times and I prefer the Composite Acoustics sound ( You might prefer the Rainsong tone ). I am seriously considering purchasing this one....

http://elderly.com//new_instruments/items/PSGX.htm

here is a link to the CA website...

http://compositeacoustics.com/

[MJH]

I own a Rainsong WS 1000 and love it. To my ears, there is no loss of richness. It doesn't sound like wood, but has it's own very rich, high quality sound. I have no problem playing it in any situation where a high quality guitar is needed.

I know there is a lot of love on this forum for the CA's and I understand. A very nice sounding quality guitar. I did get a chance to A/B the CA vs. the Rainsong and really preferred the Rainsong. That's just me. People talk about it sounding more like a wood guitar. That maybe true, but that also maybe the reason I went with a Rainsong. I loved the different sound it has. It really is crystal clear and rings like a bell.

Good luck with your search and decision.

[marioed]

The big advantage with carbon fiber guitars is that they are relatively impervious to weather. They don't need to be humidified and can wthstand both higher and lower temperatures than wood guitars. I still would'nt leave one in a parked car all day when it's hot. The disadvantage from my perspective is that they do not "open up", they will pretty much always sound the same as they do when you buy one. For me they also lack the esthetic or warmth of a wood guitar. I have an Emerald carbon fiber that I use as my travel guitar when it's too hot or cold for wood and it's great for that purpose, but when I can I always choose one of my wood guitars to play. If I could only have one guitar I'd go with solid wood.
I've played both Rainsong's and CA's and prefer the tone of the CA's but thought the Rainsong's were pretty good. Between the two it would be a matter of personal choice as both are very well made. I ended up with an Emerald because it sounded good had an adjustable truss rod and was significantly less expensive than a Rainsong or CA. Unfortunately Emerald closed their factory, so they are no longer available.
Regards,
Ed

[stoney]

Just a note on leaving a CA guitar in a hot car all day; no problem. They really are not adversely affected by the heat. I made the mistake one day of leaving my CA out in the midday sun, face up in the open case, for a few hours while I was playing dobro at a jam. When I went to pick up the guitar it was literally too hot to touch. That black top really soaked up the solar energy! I just put the guitar in the shade for a bit and all was well. It was even in tune! Of course, I don't recommend this, but if I ever need a solar-powered barbeque grill...

I leave mine in the car, in the case, for long weekends at the bluegrass festivals. The dobro, however, needs a climate case, as it is wooden.

Have fun, and Happy New Year!

Stoney

[gtr4me]

The only Rainsong I played was a WS1000 and I thought it was quite unique in a very good way. It was shimmering, not brittle, loud - very loud, and did well as both finger picking and flat picking. I have always wondered if all WS1000's were as good as that one. If they are, I would not hesitate to own and play one. It seemed like a high quality instrument in its own right and not a back seat to any wooden guitar. Just different. I have never played a CA.

[Kindness]

Originally Posted by astrummer

Not sure which you would prefer ( wood prefer?) but I think that if you get the chance try a Composite Acoustics guitar which is also carbon fiber. I have had a chance to A/B them against some Rainsongs at Elderly instruments several times and I prefer the Composite Acoustics sound ( You might prefer the Rainsong tone ). I am seriously considering purchasing this one....

http://elderly.com//new_instruments/items/PSGX.htm

here is a link to the CA website...

http://compositeacoustics.com/

I went to the CA Website...really cool. Question though: 20 fret guitar, what is up with that? It doesn't look like they offer a 1 11/16th nut, but there is a shop here in Scottsdale that I will check out tomorrow. As I am on the road with my job, the CA might just be my perfect travel guitar. But I will have to have a handmade wood at home too....they are so beautiful!

Lisa

[ljguitar]

Originally Posted by itself

Just curious what everyone thinks of this carbon fiber guitar:

Hi Lisa...
I have played several brands of carbon fiber guitars. They don't do it for me...I'm a wood-n-steel kind of player.

If I were to choose to live in an uber-humidity-rich environment, like a rain forest, or needed a bullet-proof road guitar to play through an amp or PA, I'd own one.

[flip33]

The CA guitars sound pretty. The one I played felt good too. It was very loud, balanced, and warm.

Finally::

They have stainless steel frets! Very durable. Think about it. Do you have some guitars with worn frets? I do, and I'm kinda disgusted by that.

Hmmm... rekindled GAS occurring right now.....

[vti814ce]

I have played one CA guitar and it was the exact same one on the Rainsong link in the first post. I cant say anything bad about the CA Rainsong. It was clear as a bell, very bright, nice neck shape, but it doesnt sound like wood at all to me, (I guess becasue they aren't ). I dont think I would be interested in owning one, not because they arent well made, but because to me, an acoustic should be made of wood! (In some cases Laminate B/S is ok too )

Sammy

[astrummer]

Originally Posted by itself

. Question though: 20 fret guitar, what is up with that? .....
Lisa

Its 14 frets to the body which is fairly common for any acoustic guitar. The 20 frets is the total number including those on the neck but over the body. The way that the neck is molded to the body has no "heel" and the upper frets are more accessible than with a standard cutaway acoustic.

[brahmz118]

I own a RainSong jumbo, and my opinion has always been that it sounds better than any wood guitar I've ever played. It sounds fully opened up, loud, responsive and clear. Whenever I play wooden (flat-top) guitars nowadays they sound muddy and dampened to my ear. To an extent I do think I've been conditioned to feel this way, since the RainSong is my primary guitar (due to its relative imperviousness to humidity and temperature changes).

But I can understand it's not for everyone. It's sort of like replacing a human arm with a bionic arm. The carbon fiber allows for an ultra-thin unbraced top that's not possible with wood. RainSong's engineers probably see wood's relative muddiness as a weakness, whereas most traditionalists may see it as warmth and tonal character.

I've tried one of RainSong's new Advanced Series guitars, and was somewhat disappointed. These are a lower-cost alternative to their Classic Series, but the quality seems to be compromised as well. They are heavier and quieter. I wish more Classic Series jumbos and dreads were available for people to try before forming opinions about the entire brand.

I tried a CA GX Performer recently, and I liked it a lot. Not as loud or clear as my jumbo, though better than the Advanced Series in terms of projection. And the tone is very nice. If I had to do it all over again I'd probably go with a CA dread (until they make a jumbo) -- the stainless steel frets are a great option for an otherwise indestructible guitar.

Lastly I would like to agree with marioed -- I wouldn't leave a CA or RainSong guitar in a hot car for an extended period of time, primarily because of glue issues. I do own two Emerald composite guitars, and I think they are a little more resistant to high temperatures because the bodies are all one piece -- no glue to worry about.

[TonyC]

I got a used Rainsong JM1000 this fall, and couldn't be happier. I'd been looking at both the CA's and Rainsongs, but when this one came along (at a very good price), I jumped and bought it. The resonance is magnificent, and I'm finding I prefer the "attack" I get from the undersaddle pickup (as opposed to the tone from the ES on my Taylor). The upside- no heat/cold issues, and no humidification issues either. I've taken it twice on planes, and simply checked it as baggage- and while that made me a little nervous, no problems have occured... and if they broke it, or lost it, well, the tone is standardized- every Rainsong JM1000 should sound the same-

[vti814ce]

Originally Posted by brahmz118

I own a RainSong jumbo, and my opinion has always been that it sounds better than any wood guitar I've ever played. It sounds fully opened up, loud, responsive and clear. Whenever I play wooden (flat-top) guitars nowadays they sound muddy and dampened to my ear. To an extent I do think I've been conditioned to feel this way, since the RainSong is my primary guitar (due to its relative imperviousness to humidity and temperature changes).

But I can understand it's not for everyone. It's sort of like replacing a human arm with a bionic arm. The carbon fiber allows for an ultra-thin unbraced top that's not possible with wood. RainSong's engineers probably see wood's relative muddiness as a weakness, whereas most traditionalists may see it as warmth and tonal character.

I've tried one of RainSong's new Advanced Series guitars, and was somewhat disappointed. These are a lower-cost alternative to their Classic Series, but the quality seems to be compromised as well. They are heavier and quieter. I wish more Classic Series jumbos and dreads were available for people to try before forming opinions about the entire brand.

I tried a CA GX Performer recently, and I liked it a lot. Not as loud or clear as my jumbo, though better than the Advanced Series in terms of projection. And the tone is very nice. If I had to do it all over again I'd probably go with a CA dread (until they make a jumbo) -- the stainless steel frets are a great option for an otherwise indestructible guitar.

Lastly I would like to agree with marioed -- I wouldn't leave a CA or RainSong guitar in a hot car for an extended period of time, primarily because of glue issues. I do own two Emerald composite guitars, and I think they are a little more resistant to high temperatures because the bodies are all one piece -- no glue to worry about.

Hey brahmz,
Welcome to the forum! There's alot of Composite Acoustic fans around here, you will fit in fine!Since your used to a jumbo I can see why you would feel almost anything else lacks clearity and the crispness that the stiffer composite's would have in large doses! That Rainsong i played was very clear and very nice, they have all the highs and to me a little bit "tighter" or more focused mid range and a clear direct bass that wasnt as warm (insert your term here ). I dont think the warm overtones that come from woods are nearly as pleasing in a Composite. To me the tones on a nice wood acoustic sounds more musical, natural maybe.It truly is a personal preference and a matter of what someone is used to hearing because those composite's ive heard all sound REALLY nice, a little different , not worse , just something nice and different. I bet a Jumbo is awsome!

Welcome to the AGF!

Sammy

[exhaust_49]

To me any composite guitar just sounds too perfect. Every guitar (of the same model) sounds the same and the guitar will sound as good as it gonna get the day you buy it. It won't open up like a wood guitar.