View Single Post
  #5  
Old 09-27-2014, 04:34 PM
murrmac123 murrmac123 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Edinburgh, bonny Scotland
Posts: 5,197
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LouieAtienza View Post
The radius at the end is predetermined because the width (chord) and height (sagitta) are defined...

Or are you trying to reel me in?
Now then Louie, would I do a thing like that ...although I did have you in mind as i was typing the post.



Quote:
Originally Posted by rick-slo View Post
I don't have the calculations at hand but you are looking for equal sagittal depth assuming the fretboard thickness was not tapered to begin with.

However question: aren't conical fretboards not truly conical but instead have multi-radiuses which are blended one into another?

Yes, the fretboard starts off at a constant thickness, but tapered to the required widths (which will be 1.75" at the nut and 2.5" at the end.

The fretboard surface is actually a true section of a cone.

My nut radius will be 14", and it works out that with a 1.75" wide nut and a 2.5" wide fretboard end, the radius at the end will be 20" exactly.
Reply With Quote