Quote:
Originally Posted by golfreggie
David Duval of the golf channel and a former #1 presented that what Phil could have done and used the rules to his best advantage would have been to declare the resulting position of the putt "unplayable", and under the rules one option would have been to return to the original position and play again from there with a 1-shot penalty, which in all likelihood would have produced a lower score. I haven't looked it up, but did anyone else hear that from Duval?
|
Yes and DD is absolutely correct. But that wouldn’t have rubbed the USGA’s nose in it, which was the entire point of his actions meaning he should have been DQ’d. That’s a good ruling to remember in your own play.
__________________
Consensus, by definition, is a lack of leadership.
|