So we have one side of the story that states the dealer is refusing return because of what the OP says is damage that most folks wouldn't even notice with a naked eye exam. This in spite of the fact that the OP just bought another guitar from them. With only this much information it doesn't sound right.
Right now it seems like a scenario that has repeated here on AGF, lots of opinions based on one side of the story. There have been requests that the OP provide the photo he has in his possession showing the damage. It's as close as we're probably going to get to hearing the other side of the story.
__________________
Goodall, Martin, Wingert
|