[Cuki79]

Originally Posted by James May

At the risk of derailing this thread off of the Ultra Tonic, I don't understand why the HFN would not work with ToneDexter. Having a very bright pickup with lots of highs would not be a problem for the training algorithm. I don't think gluing would explain it. From my perspective, there must have been something else going on.

Hi everyone,

I heard Dave's glued HFN with and without Tonedexter.

Fail is a big word. Tonedexter did his job... But it did not compensate enough honestly. It's the first time I've heard that but I thought the Tonedexter in this very specific case did not bring more than it took (in standard mode).

I am very picky with signal processing. A process should bring more to the table than it removes. I am a big advocate for IR convolution... So I am not saying Tonedexter is bad.

In "studio mode", the tonedexter would do the job much better but the overall sound was really wet as usual with long IRs.