View Single Post
  #19  
Old 12-21-2017, 12:09 PM
Rodger Knox Rodger Knox is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Baltimore, Md.
Posts: 2,431
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Otterhound View Post
Both and all of them .
Parsing this into separate items is not where I am going on this .
I'll try again .
What is the reason for a bridge to be 3/8" or 11/32" thick/deep behind where the saddle/s are located ?
The height of strings off the top needs to be about 1/2". The saddle needs to have about 1/8" projection above the bridge. The bridge needs to be 1/2"-1/8"= 3/8" thick.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Otterhound View Post
Must that weight be contained totally within the physical bridge itself ?
No.

I see where you're going, and I do believe that you may be able to make a lighter than normal bridge by using a lexan plate to anchor the strings.

There are other ways. I slant the saddle back about 8°, which greatly reduces the load the saddle puts on the front of the slot, so the slot can be closer to the front of the bridge. I angle the pins back at about the same angle. The bridge is full height for the front half, the back half angles from full height to about 1/16" thick. The last bridge I made was madrose and weighed less than 20 grams.
__________________
Rodger Knox, PE
1917 Martin 0-28
1956 Gibson J-50
et al
Reply With Quote