Thread: My First "Kit"
View Single Post
Old 02-18-2011, 07:03 PM
OddManOut's Avatar
OddManOut OddManOut is offline
Charter Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Carson City, Nv (Want a jackrabbit? We've got extras!)
Posts: 2,967

Originally Posted by gitnoob View Post
My understanding is that the orientation makes no difference, but I would have liked to hear the discussion.
Luthier #1-a luthier of noted talent-said that, in theory , the reversed orientation would tighten the bass side and loosen the treble. Thus, in theory, it would push the tone toward the mid. In practice, he said, he didn't know what would happen and it was not a risk he would want to take.

Luthier #2- a longtime repair guy- said that he's converted a number of left hand Martin to right handed and they sounded just fine.

Larry and I believed the latter, but wanted to do it right on principle. When I saw the tidiness of Larry's fix, i was really, really impressed!

Nice looking box, BTW!
Thank you!

So you decided not to tuck the lower legs of the X into the kerfing? I'm curious if that was discussed -- I've always wondered if tucking was necessary. Seems like it shouldn't be, but everybody does it.
I don't remember now which ends were faded out and which were tucked. I think we faded out the lower bout ends of the X, tucked the upper ends.
Martin 00-18G (1949); Eastman 805 Archie; Waterloo WL-S; Stonebridge G21 (Redcedar/Khaya); Furch OM1 (Sitka/EIR); Tahoe Guitar Co.: OM (Adi/Mahog); 000-12 (Carp Spruce/FG Mahog); 000-12 (Lutz/Flame Maple); 00-12 (Carp Spruce/Sinker Mahog)

"Any major dude with half a heart surely will tell you my friend
Any minor world that breaks apart falls together again"

Last edited by OddManOut; 02-18-2011 at 08:09 PM.
Reply With Quote