Quote:
Originally Posted by lpa53
Using the hands-off settings, I gave AAMS a shot using a wav I'd mixed in Audacity several years ago. That might affect the outcome, but I'm not sure it's done a whole lot. It probably takes an ear that actually knows what to look for, but I'm not sure but I like the original better. It seems less harsh.
Regarding volume, unlike your samples, it was very slightly increased in AAMS output. For a closer comparison, I used MP3Gain to get the two close to the same.
The Original
AAMS |
The main difference in the AAMS compared to the original is about a 3 decibel cut centered around the 125 hertz frequency in the AAMS clip.
That's more detailed than I thought they would do. Whether that is some generalization they use or whether there is the use of some more
sophisticated algorithms I don't know.