The Acoustic Guitar Forum

The Acoustic Guitar Forum (https://www.acousticguitarforum.com/forums/index.php)
-   Classical (https://www.acousticguitarforum.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=46)
-   -   Nylon vs Classical (https://www.acousticguitarforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=377672)

Dave T 03-01-2015 09:05 AM

Nylon vs Classical
 
To the moderators, owners and whoever is in charge:

Since the majority of threads on this forum seem to deal with crossover and/or hybrid style guitars, would it be more honesty and informative to call this section "Nylon" rather than the somewhat misleading "Classical"?

Just askin',
Dave

riffmeister 03-01-2015 09:18 AM

.....or......

nylon/carbon/titanium/gut

:D

ukejon 03-01-2015 10:35 AM

Nothing "Classical" ever gets played on my nylon string guitar!

WaddyT 03-01-2015 11:24 AM

But, that's not our problem! :D

brucefulton 03-01-2015 12:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave T (Post 4382861)
To the moderators, owners and whoever is in charge:

Since the majority of threads on this forum seem to deal with crossover and/or hybrid style guitars, would it be more honesty and informative to call this section "Nylon" rather than the somewhat misleading "Classical"?

Just askin',
Dave

Classical guitar is commonly used to refer both to the guitar and to the repertoire and to the style of playing. Many words have more than one meaning and sense of usage. This is a polyseme (more applicable here than homonym), a word or phrase with different, but related senses. There is nothing really to do about it. The different senses of the word classical guitar are all correct.

mc1 03-01-2015 12:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by brucefulton (Post 4383209)
Classical guitar is commonly used to refer both to the guitar and to the repertoire and to the style of playing. Many words have more than one meaning and sense of usage. This is a polyseme (more applicable here than homonym), a word or phrase with different, but related senses. There is nothing really to do about it. The different senses of the word classical guitar are all correct.

i think dave is pointing out that for many of the threads in the classical subforum, none of the 3 definitions of "classical" apply.

ukejon 03-01-2015 01:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mc1 (Post 4383219)
i think dave is pointing out that for many of the threads in the classical subforum, none of the 3 definitions of "classical" apply.

In which case "classical" would not be a polyseme but instead a rare "nadaseme" or a "nonoseme", right?

mc1 03-01-2015 01:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ukejon (Post 4383242)
In which case "classical" would not be a polyseme but instead a rare "nadaseme" or a "nonoseme", right?

:D yes, or "naughtaseme".

Dave T 03-01-2015 02:46 PM

Thanks mc1. At least someone got the point I was trying to make.

Dave

brucefulton 03-01-2015 06:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mc1 (Post 4383219)
i think dave is pointing out that for many of the threads in the classical subforum, none of the 3 definitions of "classical" apply.

Such as? Classical guitar is a polyseme for nylon string guitar. So all the threads that apply to nylon string guitar but not to classical music or classical repertoire are included in the definition of classical guitar. Really.

It's pretty simple to ignore the threads you don't want to read. Or do we really need to set up a "Nylon String Guitar but not Classical Guitar If You Know What I Mean" section?

mc1 03-01-2015 07:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by brucefulton (Post 4383768)
Such as? Classical guitar is a polyseme for nylon string guitar. So all the threads that apply to nylon string guitar but not to classical music or classical repertoire are included in the definition of classical guitar. Really.

It's pretty simple to ignore the threads you don't want to read. Or do we really need to set up a "Nylon String Guitar but not Classical Guitar If You Know What I Mean" section?

i wouldn't say that all nylon string guitars are classical guitars. but that's just my opinion. nylon would appear to more encompassing a term.

however, not all classical guitars are strung with nylon strings, so nylon isn't completely encompassing.

brucefulton 03-01-2015 07:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mc1 (Post 4383834)
i wouldn't say that all nylon string guitars are classical guitars. but that's just my opinion. nylon would appear to more encompassing a term.

however, not all classical guitars are strung with nylon strings, so nylon isn't completely encompassing.

Well, you are killing your own argument. I suppose it would be possible to take a Godin ACS-SA, load it up with repro gut strings, plug it into a Roland synth, play a riff on Downland's Lacrimae written for Lute, notated in tab, with Marshall overdrive settings, harmonize it on a looper using Christopher Parkening's Sherry Brenner Ramirez 1a that you've outfitted with a Fishman DI box and then you want to ***** about the title of the discussion section?

Can we just get back to business?

ukejon 03-01-2015 08:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by brucefulton (Post 4383768)
Such as? Classical guitar is a polyseme for nylon string guitar. So all the threads that apply to nylon string guitar but not to classical music or classical repertoire are included in the definition of classical guitar. Really.

It's pretty simple to ignore the threads you don't want to read. Or do we really need to set up a "Nylon String Guitar but not Classical Guitar If You Know What I Mean" section?

Dave T and mc1 raise a valid and interesting point. These days, the descriptor "Classical" is more precisely a subset of "Nylon", as are many other types of nylon string guitar as well:

* Gypsy Jazz (Gitane, etc)
* Archtop (Slaman, etc)
* Folk (Takamine, etc)
* Flamenco (many makers)
* Crossover (many makers)
* Solid Body (ESP, etc)
* Travel/"Silent" (Yamaha, etc)
* Tenor (Greg Miller, etc)

The common denominator is the use of nylon strings. Not sure that lumping them all under the term "Classical" makes sense any more.

Dave T 03-02-2015 08:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ukejon (Post 4384008)
Dave T and mc1 raise a valid and interesting point. These days, the descriptor "Classical" is more precisely a subset of "Nylon", as are many other types of nylon string guitar as well:

* Gypsy Jazz (Gitane, etc)
* Archtop (Slaman, etc)
* Folk (Takamine, etc)
* Flamenco (many makers)
* Crossover (many makers)
* Solid Body (ESP, etc)
* Travel/"Silent" (Yamaha, etc)
* Tenor (Greg Miller, etc)

The common denominator is the use of nylon strings. Not sure that lumping them all under the term "Classical" makes sense any more.

Thanks to ukejon as well. You have struck the nail upon the flat part!

Dave

ZippyChip 03-02-2015 08:25 AM

"Classical" to me means that it is historically similar to the first modern style guitars made long ago.
Even if I played only punk rock on it it would still be a classical guitar. That is my understanding of the meaning behind the name.
However, I also refer to it as "Nylon" when it may be too confusing or misunderstood by the listener.
Also consider what it looks like when you use "classical" technique while playing a non-classical piece of music. You could be still be considered classical guitar payer except for not playing a classical piece of music.
Short story for me is it is still a classical guitar.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:33 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, The Acoustic Guitar Forum

vB Ad Management by =RedTyger=