Takamine acoustics
Hi All,
I've noticed over the years that a lot of folks use Takamine acoustics (Eagles come to mind - I saw them a few months ago in Foxboro MA) especially live. Why is that? Is it the pick-up system or are they just really nice guitars? Obviously I don't know much about them. I've never played one. Also, I'm partial to Jumbo body styles and I am not a fan of cut-aways on acoustics. I see on the Takamine web site that almost all of their Jumdo guitars have cutaways. I think I saw only one that didn't and that one only came in a black finish. I have nothing against black guitars but I'm just wondering why the other models only come in a cut-away. Anybody know if they have non-cut-away models? Thanks, John |
I brought one because for it's price it had the best sounding guitar plugged in.....
and it sounded okay without. |
To me, Takamine guitars are like old Peavey amps - They are a good solid workhorse instrument that get the job done. Nothing really fancy about them, just good playing, good sounding guitars that will do the job.
I don't have one right now, but if I was going back on the road and looking for a gig-worthy acoustic/electric, a Tak would be on my short list. Rev George |
Takamine = Big bang for the buck. Every one I own I first liked the look, then liked the way it played, and finally liked the price.
|
I've had some experience with them.Excellent pre amps.
I would recommend the higher end ones made in Japan.Those are truly first class instuments. Have not been impressed with their "G" series. |
folkman2,
Many touring pros use Takamines because of the consistent plug-and-play nature of the guitars. They are not overly expensive, while they take-a-licking-and-keep-on-ticking. The company also sponsors artist to use their guitars. Takamine has or has had a few non-cutaway jumbo models. Search both the active and inactive categories for some models. In slightly smaller bodies they offer the Nex and OM models. Both without cutaways. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I had the ply version of their D-28 copy back in the mid '70s and it was a heck of a guitar for the price point, even with that laminated top. After getting it, I finally realized what those Martin look-alikes were in all the Eagles' onstage photos.
I always assumed they used them because they were good sounding, well built guitars that weren't so expensive you felt they needed to be babied when touring. But I guess without asking Glenn Frey himself, we may never know. |
Quote:
|
my 1963 Takamine is a wonderful nylon string, sounds great and is a real beauty to boot.
|
Quote:
http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4154/...c0b0ed65_b.jpg |
Quote:
|
I have just sold a Takamine AN10 all solid wood guitar MIJ.
To be honest, I really didn't get on with it. It was comfortable and had a simplistic beauty to it, but for the money it costs I think you can do far better. I certainly do not agree that they are good value on the basis of this guitar. I believe that things go in cycles - you use to get hundreds of Ovations played on stage - now it seems you get hundreds of Taks. I have heard their pre-amp is very good, but have not any experience of it. If I work out how - I'll try and attach a picture of my old AN10. |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:10 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, The Acoustic Guitar Forum