The Acoustic Guitar Forum

The Acoustic Guitar Forum (https://www.acousticguitarforum.com/forums/index.php)
-   Classical (https://www.acousticguitarforum.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=46)
-   -   Bridge beads?!? (https://www.acousticguitarforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=461864)

ARiley 03-02-2017 08:23 PM

Bridge beads?!?
 
So I ran across three or four varieties of these little items online -- it's a way to secure your nylon strings to the bridge without the customary tie. Who knew? Not me.

Your thoughts? I mean, besides the non-traditional look? I thought I might try them on my ancient beater Hondo, just for an experiment.

steveh 03-03-2017 02:56 AM

Their main benefit is that they increase the string break angle over the saddle. If there's no need for that, i.e. your saddle is an adequate height, then I wouldn't bother.

I suppose they are easier to tie for the ham-fisted, but that's not their primary purpose IMHO.

Cheers,
Steve

121 03-03-2017 05:16 AM

I gave bridge beads a try on a ukulele and a guitar I use to have.
I used the beads because I felt it would help save wear and tear on the bridge from the traditional method of attaching stings to the bridge.
You may notice the guitar is showing slight wear on the bridge next to the bridge beads, from when the two previous sets of strings were tied to the bridge.

Of the two styles of beads, I preferred the smaller sized beads that are shown on the guitar. Because the beads were a smaller size, it was a little more difficult for my clumsy fingers to thread the nylon string thru those tiny holes and tie off the string, but I favored the more compact appearance of smaller beads compared to the larger beads.
If I were to ever get another nylon stringed ukulele or guitar, I would use those smaller bridge beads again that I found at https://www.stringsbymail.com/rosett...ack-13153.html



http://i.imgur.com/iy6WFQG.jpg?1
http://i.imgur.com/quBHUCk.jpg?1http://

Kontrapunctus 01-22-2019 02:15 PM

A luthier friend of mine said they would add a lot of mass to the bridge--he didn't think that was a good idea!

jrethorst 01-22-2019 09:28 PM

> A luthier friend of mine said they would add a lot of mass to the bridge--he didn't think that was a good idea!

Adding much mass to the bridge wouldn't be a good idea, he's right, but these ties hardly weigh anything.

Quickstep192 01-28-2019 01:45 PM

I use the diamond string beads made by Rosette. They weigh almost nothing.

I donít know how I lived without them!

lpa53 01-28-2019 05:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Quickstep192 (Post 5962728)
I use the diamond string beads made by Rosette. They weigh almost nothing.

I donít know how I lived without them!

I like them, too. I've recently tired the newer low-profile ones. They're a bit better looking but in some ways are harder to string up. I also have my classical rigged for a twelve-hole bridge, but between the two I think the beads are more secure on the treble strings.

H165 12-29-2019 04:50 PM

I know this is an older thread, but thought I'd comment here that LaBella has been using bridge beads (ball-end strings) for at least 57 years that I personally know of (I've been using them that long), without many complaints. They're very light weight.

Westy 01-04-2020 02:11 PM

Another fan of Rosette Diamond beads, very lightweight and easy to use so I have them on my 3 classical guitars.

I can string the Rosett's quicker than the time it takes too lace the strings at the bridge traditionally and they don't slip. They look nice and tidy and I havn't had any issues at all with them.

Good product IMHO.

lpa53 01-05-2020 06:56 AM

I use bridge beads and have commented on this thread already but just now remembered a comment made about them by a classical guitar repairer. He'd not worked on a guitar that had them before and he told me that having them on made it much easier for him to unstring and restring the guitar while working on the guitar.

TBman 01-12-2020 07:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Westy (Post 6256328)
Another fan of Rosette Diamond beads, very lightweight and easy to use so I have them on my 3 classical guitars.

I can string the Rosett's quicker than the time it takes too lace the strings at the bridge traditionally and they don't slip. They look nice and tidy and I havn't had any issues at all with them.

Good product IMHO.

I'm going to give them a try.

btbliatout 01-12-2020 12:36 PM

I highly recommend them. They certainly save time when changing strings. I estimate 5 minutes. I also believe it provides less wear over the years.

I use them on all my classicals.

TRose 01-12-2020 04:39 PM

Bridge beads?!?
 
I also like them. I have had one experience that I will share. I used them on an Emerald X7 nylon. I was putting on Aquila Rubino strings. As i understand it, these strings initially had a breakage issue until the formulation was adjusted. Using the beads all the strings went on as expected except the high E string. It broke at the bead twice. I put it on without the bead and had no further breakage issues. I havenít had this problem with other strings on other guitars.
Not sure of the significance but thought Iíd share the experience.

Dr OíFluf 01-13-2020 08:49 AM

Iíve just bought a set prompted by my thread on ball end strings.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:55 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, The Acoustic Guitar Forum

vB Ad Management by =RedTyger=