Video Comparison: trebles of Hannbach Goldin Vs Knobloch CX Actives EDIT: new video
Hi (EDIT: better new video, new strings given more time to settle over night and recording was clearer)
In a previous thread somebody asked me to do a comparison of: Knobloch CX Actives trebles (HT) Vs Hannabach Goldin trebles So I recorded a song with the Hannabach Goldin strings, and then after I thought I'd change strings to compare them. The Hannabach strings were not old at all, and I should have let them live out their time, but I was impulsive. The Knoblochs had been on for an evening and a morning and had been stretched and played well before recording. I tried to keep everything the same: position of the mic, the bass strings are the same in both (Knobloch CX MT), my playing (sorry there is a little extra intro in the 2nd video). To avoid bias, listen yourself before you read my opinions. Hannabach Goldin: Knobloch CX actives: My qualitative observations so far:
|
I can't discern 3rd string tubbiness through my laptop speakers. What I can hear is the sharper character of the Knobloch CX actives. During the early strum, the Goldins sound comparatively flaccid. For my own playing/tunings, the Goldins do well - haven't tried the Knobloch CX actives.
|
Hi Bax, I'm starting to really like these Knoblochs. For the style of music I play, the extra power and brightness is what I like.
I updated the Knobloch video the following morning after they had had more time to settle in. I think the recording is better, and the differences are easier to discern. |
Do you consider these CX actives as generally characteristic of the carbon family?
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:45 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, The Acoustic Guitar Forum