The Acoustic Guitar Forum  

Go Back   The Acoustic Guitar Forum > General Acoustic Guitar and Amplification Discussion > Amplification (Electrified!!!)

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 11-24-2005, 05:38 PM
gerardo1000 gerardo1000 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Michigan
Posts: 717
Default Baggs PARA DI or Fishman Pro EQ Platinum ?

Which would you choose to impeove the amplified sound of your acoustic guitar ?

Thanks for the advice,
gerardo1000
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-24-2005, 07:12 PM
makikogi makikogi is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Silver Spring, MD
Posts: 1,102
Default

i think most people, included myself, will recommend the Baggs....but I'd say give both a try and let your ears decide...g'luck
__________________
Mark

Rainsong WS1000
Taylor "T6" Custom w/added element UST
USA Tele Deluxe
Ibanex SRX-500
Vox AC-15

Korg Pitch Black (2x), Fishman Aura 16, BBE Sonic Stomp, LR Baggs PADI, Boss TU-2, Sansamp Tech21 Bass Driver, Boss GE-7 Bass EQ, MXR Micro Amp, Keely BD-2, Fulltone OCD, Fulltone Fulldrive 2 Mosfet, Boss DD-20, BBE supacharger

Up next: Empress EQ, Radial J48
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-24-2005, 09:11 PM
sdelsolray sdelsolray is online now
Charter Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 4,117
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gerardo1000
Which would you choose to impeove the amplified sound of your acoustic guitar ?

Thanks for the advice,
gerardo1000
Neither. There are other preamp/eqs that I would chose.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-24-2005, 10:00 PM
ljguitar's Avatar
ljguitar ljguitar is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: wyoming
Posts: 32,345
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gerardo1000
Which would you choose to impeove the amplified sound of your acoustic guitar ?
Hi G...
I've mixed both.

The ParaDI has more adjustable functions - if you need them. It also fits in the pick drawer of most cases. It has a solid metal case & good quality jacks and pots.

The Fishman Platinum has a nice full and quiet sound. I like what the Bass version does to a bass better than what the Acoustic version does for acoustic guitars. It is large, plastic covered and awkwardly over sized.

For preamps in the $130 - $200 price range they are both fine pieces of equipment.
__________________
Larry J

Baby #01
Baby #02
Baby #03
Baby #04
Full-size Full-Scale Baby #4

Larry's songs...

…Just because you've argued till a discussion turns silent doesn't mean you have convinced anyone…
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-25-2005, 07:23 AM
gerardo1000 gerardo1000 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Michigan
Posts: 717
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sdelsolray
Neither. There are other preamp/eqs that I would chose.
Could give me an example ? Thanks,

Gerardo1000
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-25-2005, 10:11 AM
sdelsolray sdelsolray is online now
Charter Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 4,117
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gerardo1000
Could give me an example ? Thanks,

Gerardo1000
In no particular order, a Presonus Acousti-Q, (used) Rane AP-13, (used) Raven Labs PMB-II or D-TAR Solstice. These are all dual source blenders (the Rane is true stereo), with more features and with better sound. They would run between $250 and $350.

Understand my prejudice: dual source systems are much better than single source systems.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-25-2005, 10:22 AM
woodyboyd's Avatar
woodyboyd woodyboyd is offline
Luthier
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 1,694
Default

It's in the Baggs.
__________________
Musically yours,

Woody Boyd
Luthier
"Home of the banjo eating HOG"
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-27-2005, 10:54 PM
Nelson's Avatar
Nelson Nelson is offline
Hot Java Junkie
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Northeast Colorado
Posts: 3,628
Default

I've been using an Ultrasound DI Plus. I like the tone I get with both my 414rces and 514ce. My 514ce has a Baggs Element Active Onboard in place of the Fishmen Blender. Works great for me. I get the same clean tone that I get with my Ultrasound AG50DS2.

Though if given a choice between the Baggs and the Fishman, I'd definatly pick the Para DI over the Fishman.
__________________
I have a photographic memory...but I'm out of film.

Nelson

Taylors
2002 514ce
2003 414ce Ltd
2010 Fender Strat
Ultrasound AG50DS2
Ultrasound DI Plus
Roland Cube 80X
Korg D-12 Digital Studio
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-28-2005, 08:47 AM
Tom S. Tom S. is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Lincoln, NE
Posts: 708
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nelson
I've been using an Ultrasound DI Plus. I like the tone I get with both my 414rces and 514ce. My 514ce has a Baggs Element Active Onboard in place of the Fishmen Blender. Works great for me. I get the same clean tone that I get with my Ultrasound AG50DS2.

Though if given a choice between the Baggs and the Fishman, I'd definatly pick the Para DI over the Fishman.
+1 on the Ultrasound DI Plus. It is a little bigger I think, but works very well and has an effects loop and separate send controls. Very good price also.
__________________
97 Taylor 810
02 Taylor 814CE
97 Fender Tele - played twice
Formerly ITArchitect
Reply With Quote
Reply

  The Acoustic Guitar Forum > General Acoustic Guitar and Amplification Discussion > Amplification (Electrified!!!)

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Loading

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:36 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, The Acoustic Guitar Forum
vB Ad Management by =RedTyger=