The Acoustic Guitar Forum

Go Back   The Acoustic Guitar Forum > General Acoustic Guitar and Amplification Discussion > General Acoustic Guitar Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 11-23-2017, 07:05 AM
SycamoreDan SycamoreDan is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 264
Default Waterloo WL-12 vs WL-14x

To those of you who have spent some quality time with or owned both, how would you compare the tone of these two? The maple on the 12 would suggest a brighter tone than the mahogany on the 14, but the bridge placement on the 12 would seem to yield a slightly fuller tone (esp. bass) than the 14. I like both guitars but can only buy one. I would be using it for a largely travis picking style to support singing. I have played them but would simply like to hear other people's impressions. Thanks in advance.
__________________
Check out my music at Bandcamp and YouTube.

https://danpetrich.bandcamp.com/releases

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCNX...ulywGw_QzkhL3Q
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-23-2017, 08:41 AM
Hasbro Hasbro is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Austin
Posts: 624
Default Waterloo WL-12 vs WL-14x

Quote:
Originally Posted by SycamoreDan View Post
To those of you who have spent some quality time with or owned both, how would you compare the tone of these two? The maple on the 12 would suggest a brighter tone than the mahogany on the 14, but the bridge placement on the 12 would seem to yield a slightly fuller tone (esp. bass) than the 14. I like both guitars but can only buy one. I would be using it for a largely travis picking style to support singing. I have played them but would simply like to hear other people's impressions. Thanks in advance.


I was surprised that neither of those really did it for me. I wound up with a WL-s
__________________
really likes guitars
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-23-2017, 08:51 AM
stephenT's Avatar
stephenT stephenT is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: GA & MN
Posts: 4,679
Default

I have them both, you'd expect the maple to be brighter but that's not the case, it's a sweeter and fuller sound, the mahogany being a little drier.

The 12 frets to body WL-12 is a joy to play, I love the neck profile and the shorter neck. When compared to the WL14x (mine has the "smaller' neck profile), the WL-12 is easier to play, less reach to everything. I have the WL-14 set up w/ a Sunrise and use it on gigs,.. i record w/ both guitars and it's easy to get a great sound from either.

So, if you don't need 14 frets clear the WL-12 is a great choice for it's playability and sweeter tone. But don't get me wrong, for me it'd be like choosing between children, both are keepers.

this pic may help give you an idea of the relative neck length and bridge placement on both Waterloos.

Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-23-2017, 12:39 PM
SycamoreDan SycamoreDan is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 264
Default

Stephen,

Thanks so much for the information and pics.
__________________
Check out my music at Bandcamp and YouTube.

https://danpetrich.bandcamp.com/releases

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCNX...ulywGw_QzkhL3Q
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-23-2017, 06:09 PM
SycamoreDan SycamoreDan is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 264
Default

I found demo videos of the WL-14x and WL-12 played by the same guy with the same mics at The Music Emporium. The first is the WL-14x from the start. The second is the WL-12, but go to 1:38 to hear the guy from the first video play. To my ears, the WL-14 sounds bigger with fuller tones, whereas the WL-12 sounds brighter, tamer somehow. What do you hear?



__________________
Check out my music at Bandcamp and YouTube.

https://danpetrich.bandcamp.com/releases

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCNX...ulywGw_QzkhL3Q
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-23-2017, 06:19 PM
stephenT's Avatar
stephenT stephenT is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: GA & MN
Posts: 4,679
Default

SycamoreDan, it'd be hard to tell from those two videos, if you look closely the mic placement is completely different. Also the WL-14 is a t-Bar, gonna sound different from a truss rod model.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-23-2017, 07:37 PM
Guest 728
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by stephenT View Post
I have them both, you'd expect the maple to be brighter but that's not the case, it's a sweeter and fuller sound, the mahogany being a little drier.

The 12 frets to body WL-12 is a joy to play, I love the neck profile and the shorter neck.
StephenT sums up my experience, as well.

I've long maintained that maple probably does a better job than any other tonewood of transparently reflecting the tone of the top. So if the top yields a brighter or a darker tone, the maple won't color it much. In the case of the WL12, the maple body doesn't really add brightness so much as it presents the 12-fret-body effect with greater accuracy. I played both the WL12 and the WL14 extensively when I was looking for a Waterloo, and I ended up buying a WL12. The "sweetness" that Stephen refers to was immediately apparent, and I had to have it. I've never regretted that decision, and I'd love to get the all-mahogany version to complement it.

Last edited by Guest 728; 11-23-2017 at 09:50 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-24-2017, 06:32 AM
SycamoreDan SycamoreDan is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 264
Default

Ah, the mic placement. I see now. Certainly not a constant.

Willie, thanks for sharing your experience as well.
__________________
Check out my music at Bandcamp and YouTube.

https://danpetrich.bandcamp.com/releases

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCNX...ulywGw_QzkhL3Q
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-11-2017, 12:51 PM
SycamoreDan SycamoreDan is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 264
Default

Stephen and Willie,

I would like to report that both of you were correct in your praise of the WL-12. I purchased a WL-14XTR from a guy on Reverb. While I liked it, I was curious to compare it to the WL-12 in a nearby shop. After only a few minutes going back and forth, I knew that the WL-12 was a better fit for me. The neck carve and tone of the WL-12 won the day. I traded in the WL-14 and am very satisfied with my new guitar. I should have listened to you in the first place.
__________________
Check out my music at Bandcamp and YouTube.

https://danpetrich.bandcamp.com/releases

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCNX...ulywGw_QzkhL3Q
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-11-2017, 01:06 PM
stephenT's Avatar
stephenT stephenT is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: GA & MN
Posts: 4,679
Default

Dan, You found out for yourself, certainly the best way. Now you know for sure.

Congratulations, my WL-12 is next to me right now, ready to hit a lick when ever the desire strikes. Tonight I'll play the WL-14xtr on my gig at Fat Matt's Rib Shack. The 14 fretter has a Sunrise in it and for my duo work the extra two frets is nice for soloing.


Quote:
Originally Posted by SycamoreDan View Post
Stephen and Willie,

I would like to report that both of you were correct in your praise of the WL-12. I purchased a WL-14XTR from a guy on Reverb. While I liked it, I was curious to compare it to the WL-12 in a nearby shop. After only a few minutes going back and forth, I knew that the WL-12 was a better fit for me. The neck carve and tone of the WL-12 won the day. I traded in the WL-14 and am very satisfied with my new guitar. I should have listened to you in the first place.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 12-11-2017, 01:09 PM
Guest 728
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SycamoreDan View Post
After only a few minutes going back and forth, I knew that the WL-12 was a better fit for me. The neck carve and tone of the WL-12 won the day.
Awesome! There's no substitute for experience, and sometimes that path isn't as direct as we'd like -- at least you got where you needed to be!

Congrats on your new WL12!
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 12-11-2017, 01:34 PM
upsidedown upsidedown is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 2,618
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SycamoreDan View Post
The neck carve and tone of the WL-12 won the day.
Don't know if I'm jacking or adding texture to the thread, but how would you compare the two neck profiles?
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 12-11-2017, 02:39 PM
Guest 728
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by upsidedown View Post
Don't know if I'm jacking or adding texture to the thread, but how would you compare the two neck profiles?
WL14 has a V, the WL12 is rounded. Both are robust, but neither is huge.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 12-11-2017, 02:47 PM
SycamoreDan SycamoreDan is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 264
Default

Upsidedown,

The WL-14 I owned briefly (several days) featured the most recent small neck option. While it was comfortable, I find the profile on the WL-12 even more so. Then again, I guess I prefer wimpy necks.
__________________
Check out my music at Bandcamp and YouTube.

https://danpetrich.bandcamp.com/releases

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCNX...ulywGw_QzkhL3Q
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 12-11-2017, 03:34 PM
stephenT's Avatar
stephenT stephenT is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: GA & MN
Posts: 4,679
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SycamoreDan View Post
I guess I prefer wimpy necks.
Now whoa there son,.. I wouldn't call the WL-12 neck profile wimpy.
Reply With Quote
Reply

  The Acoustic Guitar Forum > General Acoustic Guitar and Amplification Discussion > General Acoustic Guitar Discussion






All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:27 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, The Acoustic Guitar Forum
vB Ad Management by =RedTyger=