The Acoustic Guitar Forum

Go Back   The Acoustic Guitar Forum > General Acoustic Guitar and Amplification Discussion > General Acoustic Guitar Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #16  
Old 05-29-2011, 06:39 PM
SteveS's Avatar
SteveS SteveS is offline
Me
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Monument, Colorado
Posts: 9,122
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sachi View Post
Why? How would that be different from sinker redwood taken from a river?
Redwood does not rot in fresh water. Fir rots in fresh water.
__________________
“Reason is itself a matter of faith. It is an act of faith to assert that our thoughts have any relation to reality at all.”
― G.K. Chesterton
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 05-29-2011, 06:53 PM
zabdart zabdart is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 9,306
Default Douglass Fir Tops

There's a famous story about the great Spanish luthier Torrez building a guitar with a paper mache top, just to prove that the way you braced the top was more important than what you made it out of. The guitar he built, by all accounts, played and sounded just fine... and stayed together, too.
The skill and experience of the builder can overcome a lot of vagaries in the materials... but only up to an extent. The reason why most acoustics have spruce or cedar tops is because of their high stiffness to weight ratio and their acoustic properties. You can build a perfectly acceptable guitar out of non-traditional materials... if you know what you're doing. But you can only "push the envelope" so far before your results sound bad.

Last edited by zabdart; 05-29-2011 at 06:54 PM. Reason: misspelling
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 05-29-2011, 07:37 PM
JohnM JohnM is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 1,631
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by zabdart View Post
There's a famous story about the great Spanish luthier Torrez building a guitar with a paper mache top, just to prove that the way you braced the top was more important than what you made it out of. The guitar he built, by all accounts, played and sounded just fine... and stayed together, too.
The skill and experience of the builder can overcome a lot of vagaries in the materials... but only up to an extent. The reason why most acoustics have spruce or cedar tops is because of their high stiffness to weight ratio and their acoustic properties. You can build a perfectly acceptable guitar out of non-traditional materials... if you know what you're doing. But you can only "push the envelope" so far before your results sound bad.

The back and sides were from paper mâché meant to illustrate that the top was the most important aspect.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 05-29-2011, 08:00 PM
sachi sachi is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: North Seattle
Posts: 3,189
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SteveS View Post
Redwood does not rot in fresh water. Fir rots in fresh water.
Thanks, Steve. Makes sense.
__________________
Sachi

Kolaya Carmen, Trek parlor (by Harv L), Martin 000-28EC, Taylor GC-5 and 355.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 05-29-2011, 08:08 PM
zabdart zabdart is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 9,306
Default Douglas Fir for Tops

Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnM View Post
The back and sides were from paper mâché meant to illustrate that the top was the most important aspect.
Thanks for correcting me. It's always good to get my facts straight, and since I'm remembering this story from over 30 years ago, you can understand how I got the details wrong.
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 05-29-2011, 08:25 PM
Howard Klepper Howard Klepper is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Earthly Paradise of Northern California
Posts: 6,634
Default

The back and sides were actually made of a hard cardboard, similar to what "chipboard" guitar cases are made from. The papier mache thing is an often repeated mistake.

And no one who has played that guitar ever thought it was great. Just that it was OK and sounded like a guitar. Kinda like Taylor's pallet guitar in that way.

I have heard of building with Douglas fir, but have never heard a guitar with a Doug fir top. It is heavier than the more usual top woods. And not native to the UK. And not really a fir.
__________________
"Still a man hears what he wants to hear, and disregards the rest."
--Paul Simon
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 05-29-2011, 08:28 PM
Wade Hampton Wade Hampton is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Chugiak, Alaska
Posts: 31,226
Default

I've never knowingly played an instrument made with a Douglas fir top, but the times I was in Scandinavia and Russia I did play a few with tops made from pine, and quite a few with larch tops - the Russians in particular have a longstanding tradition of using larch on stringed instruments.

Even though this is usually little known outside their own countries, there's actually quite a history (in northern nations, at least) of using all sorts of conifer woods for musical instrument construction, not just the cedars and spruces.


whm
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 05-29-2011, 08:39 PM
hermithollow hermithollow is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 609
Default

I think a lot depends on the individual piece of fir and the sound you are looking for. Being "driftwood" might not be a problem if the wood is sound and properly cut. I would not use the top -because - it is driftwood, I might use it -despite- the fact that it was driftwood.
The douglas fir top I was given seems a bit heavier than the engelmann and sitka spruce I have used. I think it might work well for a bouzouki or cittern.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 05-29-2011, 08:39 PM
Acousticado's Avatar
Acousticado Acousticado is offline
Anticipation Junkie
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Oh, Canada!
Posts: 17,651
Default

I have 8 - 8x10" x 34' long douglas fir beams that came from British Columbia in my white pine log house that I built 28 years ago here in Quebec. I had applied a clear stain on them. They're beautiful. Never thought of douglas fir as a guitar tone wood. I could get a lot of guitar tops out of what I have. I better not tell my neighbour (Sergei de Jonge, lutheir). My house might fall down.
__________________
Tom
'21 Martin D-18 Standard | '02 Taylor 814c | '18 Taylor 214ceDLX | '18 Taylor 150e-12 | '78 Ibanez Dread (First acoustic) | '08 CA Cargo | '02 Fender Strat American '57 RI
My original songs
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 05-29-2011, 09:48 PM
gmm55 gmm55 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 841
Default

Indeed, Sergei's a pioneer, and he'd fearlessly give Douglas fir a go. Sergei has to be the only maker to have made a snakewood steel string, and an all spruce steel string (I mean everything, neck, sides, back, and top). Great maker.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 05-29-2011, 10:56 PM
Wade Hampton Wade Hampton is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Chugiak, Alaska
Posts: 31,226
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gmm55 View Post
Indeed, Sergei's a pioneer, and he'd fearlessly give Douglas fir a go. Sergei has to be the only maker to have made a snakewood steel string, and an all spruce steel string (I mean everything, neck, sides, back, and top). Great maker.
A couple of issues back in Fretboard Journal (my favorite guitar porn magazine) there was an article about an electric guitar builder in New York City who uses old pine beams salvaged from building restorations for Telecaster-style guitars. I think he uses a harder wood for the fingerboard, but every other piece of wood on the instrument is this old clear pine, some of it a century or two old.

By all accounts, the guitars sound marvelous.


whm
Reply With Quote
Reply

  The Acoustic Guitar Forum > General Acoustic Guitar and Amplification Discussion > General Acoustic Guitar Discussion






All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:13 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, The Acoustic Guitar Forum
vB Ad Management by =RedTyger=