The Acoustic Guitar Forum

Go Back   The Acoustic Guitar Forum > General Acoustic Guitar and Amplification Discussion > Acoustic Amplification

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 08-03-2017, 02:33 PM
DavidE DavidE is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 4,106
Default Sennheiser 845, 855 and 935 - Educate me.

First of all, please limit all comments to these three Sennheiser models only. I'd love to see this thread stay on topic. Thank you.

Now, I've done searches and read various things, but I'm still not clear on this. What are the differences among these Sennheiser models?

e845
e855
e935

Thank you!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-03-2017, 03:00 PM
ricdoug ricdoug is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Vista (North County San Diego), California USA
Posts: 824
Default

https://en-us.sennheiser.com/wireless-microphone-vocal-stage-live-evolution-d1

The microphone voices are now available as capsules and this pretty much describes the Sennheiser Evolution series microphones:

e 835 - Everything else is just standard
•e 845 - More focus. More presence
•e 865 - Sensitive for every Nuance
•e 935 - Extends every Voice
•e 945 - Presence all the Way to the Peak
•e 965 - Live Sound on the Highest Level
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-03-2017, 03:08 PM
DavidE DavidE is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 4,106
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ricdoug View Post
https://en-us.sennheiser.com/wireless-microphone-vocal-stage-live-evolution-d1

The microphone voices are now available as capsules and this pretty much describes the Sennheiser Evolution series microphones:

e 835 - Everything else is just standard
•e 845 - More focus. More presence
•e 865 - Sensitive for every Nuance
•e 935 - Extends every Voice
•e 945 - Presence all the Way to the Peak
•e 965 - Live Sound on the Highest Level
I'm not sure that really helps me. But maybe a little. ;-)

But what about the 855?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-03-2017, 09:15 PM
DavidE DavidE is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 4,106
Default

Anybody else?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-04-2017, 12:27 AM
Andy Howell Andy Howell is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,097
Default

I use the 935 which is worth the extra cash. Really strong especially on male vocals.
__________________
------
AJ Lucas Pavilion Sweep fan fret
Santa Cruz OM/E (European Pre War)
Martin J40
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-04-2017, 07:11 AM
Revy Revy is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Iowa
Posts: 347
Default Sennheiser

The 935 is a cardioid microphone, hears sounds directly in front and partially to the sides. The 855 and 945 are super cardioid. Only hears sounds directly in front. You have to be direct over, or in the pattern for the mic to pick up sound. If you move around while you sing, this mic may cause you some problems but will resist feedback more than others. I use a 935 and absolutely love it. It is a relatively hot signal microphone. I'm guessing 25% hotter than an Shure SM-58. I have never needed to use a preamp with this mic. Although I have never used one, I assume the 800 series would be more comparable to the SM-58's. Sennheiser makes great stuff. My personal opinion and others here on the forum.
__________________
1995 Collings D2H
Larrivee SD-60 12 String
2014 Martin D-18 Sunburst
2014 American Standard Telecaster (Maple Board)Mystic Blue
2008 Fender American Standard Telecaster (Rosewood Board)
1994 Fender 40th Anniversary Stratocaster Caribbean Mist
2011 Martin JC-16RE 50TH Anniversary
2004 Martin J-15
2011 Gibson ES-335 Cherry Red
1993 Continental TriCone
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-04-2017, 09:19 AM
pbb_ec pbb_ec is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Eau Claire Wi
Posts: 6
Default

My only comparison is 835 vs 935.

935 is better in my mind - subtle improvement perhaps, but I've spent far more than the $70 delta for much less (or no) benefit on many other bits of musical hardware in my seemingly futile search for the mythical perfect tone...
__________________
Seagull S6 Cedar
Taylor K26ce
Taylor 514ce
Journey RT660M
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-04-2017, 10:34 AM
Petty1818 Petty1818 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 4,582
Default

My buddy has the 835 and I have the 935 so I get to hear them side by side quite a bit. Both mics are very nice but the 935 is the better mic. It just has more clarity and a more professional sound to it. Again, the 835 is fantastic but I find I can plug in the 935 and start singing where as the 835 tends to need a bit of eq.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-04-2017, 10:37 AM
Goat Mick Goat Mick is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Bristol, TN
Posts: 6,621
Default

My only experience is with the e835 that I'm gigging with now. Excellent bang for the buck in a $100 mic. Compared to an SM58 it is much more clear and focused. It's a very articulate mic and it doesn't sound like it colors my voice at all.
__________________
'59 Gibson J-45 "Spot"
'21 Gibson LG-2 - 50's Reissue
'94 Taylor 710
'18 Martin 000-17E "Willie"
‘23 Taylor AD12e-SB
'22 Taylor GTe Blacktop
'15 Martin 000X1AE

https://pandora.app.link/ysqc6ey22hb

Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-04-2017, 10:43 AM
martingitdave martingitdave is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Chicago
Posts: 11,406
Default

I only have experience with the 835, 845, 935, and 945. The x45's are super cardioid, as mentioned. Those pose a problem for me. I am not that disciplined a singer. The benefit is that those mics reject all the side noise and bleed, which is especially good on large stages with large groups. The downside is that you have to stay right in front of them. Evidently, the 855 is somewhere between the 845 and 945 in terms of tone and is super cardioid.

The 9x's seem to have more dynamic range, presence and high end to them. They sound "prettier" to me. I think the difference is analogous to the SM58 Beta 58 comparisons. I'm a tenor, so I actually like a mic that works for both men and women.

I did a mic shootout at my local retailer with whatever they had in stock. Took a guitar and used their JBL Eon One. I came away with the e935. I was prepared to spend up to $350. I spent $170, plus 15% off that day.
__________________
"Lift your head and smile at trouble. You'll find happiness someday."
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 08-04-2017, 11:35 AM
jricc jricc is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Jersey Shore
Posts: 5,065
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mick's Goat Whiskey Picks View Post
My only experience is with the e835 that I'm gigging with now. Excellent bang for the buck in a $100 mic. Compared to an SM58 it is much more clear and focused. It's a very articulate mic and it doesn't sound like it colors my voice at all.
I gig with the 835 as well, and I'll echo every one of Mick's Goat Whiskey Picks comments. I demoed Shure's SM58 (a good mic) with the 835, and to my ears, the 835 had a lot more clarity. The 835 is a real good mic for $100.

I have to add, I never tried any of the other Sennheisers.

Last edited by jricc; 08-04-2017 at 01:16 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 08-04-2017, 02:04 PM
DavidE DavidE is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 4,106
Default

Over the years I've built up a small collection of mics... I've been gigging with my Beta 58 pretty happily but I think my singer's old SM58 is causing issues and doesn't do justice to her voice.

I have a Shure condenser, but since I don't plug directly into my board I don't always have phantom power to run it.

I had an 835 and an 855 but for some reason never used them. I just picked up a used/near mint 935 based on everything I read here. I briefly compared the 855 and the 935. To me they sound similar but the 935 is hotter and has more high end, both of which make it more prone to feedback. I didn't compare them to my Beta 58, but will at some point.

My duo was hired by one of my favorite local solo guys to play his private party tomorrow. I think I'll use the 855 and 935. Not sure which I'll hand to my singer. I'm thinking the 935 may be better for her voice... maybe not?
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 08-04-2017, 08:44 PM
Gutch's Avatar
Gutch Gutch is offline
Cocobologist
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Over by 'dere...
Posts: 4,476
Default

I bought a used e855 about 10 years ago, and it has been my go-to gigging mic since then. Output is pretty hot, but tone is very clear as compared to an SM-58 (my backup). Is perfect for my high baritone/low tenor voice.

I believe the e855 has been discontinued for several years -- I'd love to buy a NOS one as a backup if I could find it!
__________________
‎"Music is a moral law. It gives soul to the universe, wings to the mind, flight to the imagination, and charm and gaiety to life and to everything."
- Plato

| '02 814c Custom (Coco/Sitka) | '03 912ce Custom (Coco/Engelmann)| '06 K65ce | '17 J45 Std. | '10 Breedlove Revival OM DLX (EIR/Adi) | Lots of electrics...
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 08-04-2017, 09:22 PM
ricdoug ricdoug is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Vista (North County San Diego), California USA
Posts: 824
Default

I own over 200 microphones, as I'm a performing professional musician and also a professional live sound engineer. My favorite personal performing microphone is a Sennheiser E838, which is the same as the e835, except it has a gold anodized barrel instead of black. It's a great match for my vocal and tonal range. My e935 microphones have better presence and work better with softer and medium strength female vocals. The e-835 would work well with a strong female voice, such as a Janis Joplin or Bonnie Rait style voice. The reason I own so many different types of microphones is that I work with a wide variety of artists and it is pretty easy for me to match a microphone to a voice. There are even some nice microphones available in the $20 buck range.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 08-05-2017, 11:08 AM
larryjoh814 larryjoh814 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: San Diego north county
Posts: 193
Default

David, in my trio with one female voice, we all use the e935, with no issues using two Yamaha DBR10s high behind us. The clarity is outstanding, and what I notice most is the lack of proximity effect produced by the Shure beta58a I used for years. I can look over at my partners and even sing from the side of the mic and it's reproduced well.
__________________
Guild D40 NT (1978)
Eastman 522ce
www.youtube.com/user/larryjohnson65
Reply With Quote
Reply

  The Acoustic Guitar Forum > General Acoustic Guitar and Amplification Discussion > Acoustic Amplification






All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:43 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, The Acoustic Guitar Forum
vB Ad Management by =RedTyger=