The Acoustic Guitar Forum

Go Back   The Acoustic Guitar Forum > General Acoustic Guitar and Amplification Discussion > Archtops

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 11-16-2012, 07:34 AM
PulledPork PulledPork is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 8
Default Gibson L-5

Been a while since I posted but I have great respect for this group's opinions. I have a wall calendar that features a new guitar each month. So this month I've been looking at a photo of a 1924 Gibson L-5 every day under the title "The Masterpiece", with some text about Maybelle Carter. From what I can tell Gibson only makes the L-5 CES now, i.e. with on-board electronics. My questions are: (1) Is this guitar the be-all and end-all that it's cracked up to be?, (2) Is a new one worth $8700?, and (3) Even if I could find a less expensive used one without the electronics, does the guitar hold up as a purely acoustic instrument? Thanks in advance for your guidance.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-16-2012, 07:42 AM
JoeCharter JoeCharter is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 8,549
Default

I own an L-5 reissue which I bought new a couple of years ago.

Gibson's website says they discontinued -- but perhaps one can still custom order one.

It's a fully acoustic instrument -- although you may want to play one before you take the plunge.

Maybelle Carter may have been known to play an L-5, most of her peers opted for flat tops -- for obvious reasons.

Of course, in the hands of certain specialized players (not me), this guitar sounds wonderful. YMMV.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-16-2012, 08:00 AM
geordie geordie is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: this side of heaven
Posts: 2,604
Default

If it's gota be a Gibson - it's gota be.
Otherwise have a look here
http://guitarsnjazz.com/products/eastman/
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-16-2012, 08:32 AM
texasdw texasdw is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: southeast Texas
Posts: 164
Default

I have an L5 CES...electronic version with 2 pickups (bought in 2010). It is light years ahead of an ES175 that I had before that (and the ES175 was good). The solid wood definitely makes a difference.

--this is, of course, plugged in. The guitar is worthless acoustically. The version with the single pup may be better, but it's not designed as an acoustic.

My brother owns one of the old (I dunno...30's, 40's, something like that) L5 or L7s. It's a fabulous instrument, and way, waaayyy ahead of my L5 unplugged.

But, it's a completely, and I mean completely different beast than a flattop. The archtops to my ears have a very nice balance with a lot more midrange than your typical flattop. But, that comes at the expense of bass response. The bass response is nowhere near a flattop. Another interesting characteristic of the old archtop is that it sounds far better (actually spectacularly better) across the room than it does from your lap. The projection is surprisingly good.

Of course, this is a response specifically regarding a vintage Gibson archtop. Other arches (Eastman, Palen, Peerless, Benedetto, Campelone, etc) would be different. But the basics are probably similar.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-16-2012, 08:54 AM
Howard Emerson Howard Emerson is offline
AGF Sponsor
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Huntington Station, New York
Posts: 7,604
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PulledPork View Post
Been a while since I posted but I have great respect for this group's opinions. I have a wall calendar that features a new guitar each month. So this month I've been looking at a photo of a 1924 Gibson L-5 every day under the title "The Masterpiece", with some text about Maybelle Carter. From what I can tell Gibson only makes the L-5 CES now, i.e. with on-board electronics. My questions are: (1) Is this guitar the be-all and end-all that it's cracked up to be?, (2) Is a new one worth $8700?, and (3) Even if I could find a less expensive used one without the electronics, does the guitar hold up as a purely acoustic instrument? Thanks in advance for your guidance.
The guitar on your calendar page may well be a Lloyd Loar L-5, but even if it isn't it's the same instrument that Loar designed for Gibson. That body style was kept until 1935 when they went 17".

The L-5CES (I owned a '57 and a '64) have nothing to do with the Loar designed instrument. They've been X braced since 1935 and had a cutaway available since '39. Prior to '35 they were 'parallel' braced and much lighter in weight.

I own a 1927 Gibson L-5, very much like Maybelle Carter's. It is my main bottleneck instrument.

You need only try a newer L-5 CES to see that it has nothing at all in common with its acoustic ancestors.

If you fast forward to the 3:40 mark you can see me playing mine here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K6GhoxlfU5U

HE
It Ain't Necessarily So: http://howardemerson.com/music2.html
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-16-2012, 08:59 AM
zabdart zabdart is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 9,306
Default

The thing about the classic, historic L-5 -- the one designed by Lloyd Loar -- was that it was the first guitar to fully apply principles of violin making to the acoustic guitar. As such, it wasn't necessarily louder, per se, than any other acoustic guitar at the time (resophonic guitars hold that honor), but for a combination of volume, percussiveness and "cutting power," it could not be equaled, thus making it the perfect rhythm guitar in a jazz ensemble.
Fully acoustic L-5's are still available on a custom-order basis from Gibson's Custom Shop, but be prepared to spend big bucks for one. Even with machines which do most of the carving of the top and back, they are still very labor intensive. And, of course, archtops don't sound anything like flattops -- they're designed to have a more equal tonal and timbrel response. Say goodbye to nice, deep bass notes.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-16-2012, 10:26 AM
WordMan WordMan is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,696
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Howard Emerson View Post
If you fast forward to the 3:40 mark you can see me playing mine here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K6GhoxlfU5U
Sigh - well, done, sir. Just love your playing and how you sound on that guitar.
__________________
An old Gibson and a couple of old Martins; a couple of homebrew Tele's
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-16-2012, 12:47 PM
jpd jpd is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: California
Posts: 11,280
Wink

Howard...the piece you played bottleneck style was inspiring. J.D.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-16-2012, 01:26 PM
PulledPork PulledPork is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 8
Default

That is indeed a beautiful piece of playing, Howard. Thank you - all of you - for setting me straight.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-16-2012, 07:29 PM
bohemian bohemian is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: State of Jefferson
Posts: 3,508
Default

Nicely done Howard, very soulful playing. Nice guitar as well.
Reply With Quote
Reply

  The Acoustic Guitar Forum > General Acoustic Guitar and Amplification Discussion > Archtops

Thread Tools





All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:01 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, The Acoustic Guitar Forum
vB Ad Management by =RedTyger=