The Acoustic Guitar Forum

Go Back   The Acoustic Guitar Forum > General Acoustic Guitar and Amplification Discussion > Acoustic Amplification

View Poll Results: Do effects have a place on acoustic guitars?
Absolutely not, it's an abomination 11 10.48%
There's a time and place 28 26.67%
Only to enrich/enhance the natural sound 34 32.38%
Definitely, why should electrics get all the fun? 32 30.48%
Voters: 105. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #16  
Old 09-17-2014, 10:08 AM
johnd johnd is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 344
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Petty1818 View Post
I don't really like that argument. I am a minimalist when it comes to using effects but that's because I need more time to develop a sound with them. Guys like Phil Keaggy have experimented and tried different sounds with their acoustics and the results are not only impressive but also inspiring. There are traditionalists and then there are innovators.
Good counter-argument. I don't really have a position on this - as long as it's done well - and like nearly everything in music I think saying there IS a right or wrong answer is wrong. I'm just interested in what others think.
__________________
Yamaha APX-500 - Crafter MD-80 12 Eq (12-string) - and a 20 year old crappy Jose masy mas classical!
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 09-17-2014, 10:09 AM
McShepherd McShepherd is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Augusta GA (actually North Augusta SC)
Posts: 270
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Irish Pennant View Post
Some songs ask for effects, others don't.
+1 to this.

However, in my own writing/playing, I find that the more interest I find in using effects, the more I'm really just wanting to play the piece electric instead of acoustic.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 09-17-2014, 10:31 AM
Laughingboy68 Laughingboy68 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Stratford, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,037
Default

For some songs I want as close to "pure acoustic sound" as I can achieve.

For others, I'll add EQ, delay, octave, overdrive... In fact, when I play Master Blaster by Stevie Wonder, I create a percussion loop and add all of those effects at once.

If I hear any effect layered on top for song after song (ie: chorus), it gets old really fast.

I feel that same about vocal harmonizers. Mixed low and used with discretion they can be a magical addition. Too obvious, or too constant and it just sounds synthetic and fake - like the singer doesn't want you to hear their real voice.

All effects, if used well will add to the performance. It should make the audience take notice and smile, sing along or get up and dance. Used badly, and the audience just rolls their eyes - that's not what you're shooting for.

Mike
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 09-17-2014, 10:56 AM
wcap wcap is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 4,414
Default

I voted "Only to enrich and enhance the natural sound" (but in the right situation I can see how going crazy with effects could be cool too, or at least fun to play with).

With recordings, adding a tasteful little bit of reverb can make you sound like you are in a place with much better acoustics. When I have recorded my daughter playing flute or singing in church the raw recording usually sounds best. But if she is recorded at home in our heavily damped recording space, the sound is sort of sterile unless we add some reverb (at which point it sounds a lot more like the really lovely sound we get with no added effects in church).

I think playing a guitar through a PA system can be sort of the same way. A bit of reverb can make you sound more like an acoustic performance in a wonderful church or concert hall (particularly if you are playing through pickups rather than through a good microphone).

Interestingly, when I play my Goodall through the mixer and the PA, I have to turn the reverb way up (a lot higher than when playing my Martin 000-15) before being able to hear the added reverb, and then, with this guitar, it really is on the edge or past the edge of being too much reverb - that guitar has built-in reverb effects and it hardly needs any help.
__________________
A few of my early attempts at recording: https://www.youtube.com/user/wcap07/featured
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 09-17-2014, 11:06 AM
wcap wcap is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 4,414
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Laughingboy68 View Post
...
All effects, if used well will add to the performance. It should make the audience take notice and smile, sing along or get up and dance. Used badly, and the audience just rolls their eyes - that's not what you're shooting for.

Mike
I have heard several big name acoustic guitar soloists and a ukulele player too performing in person - well known names immediately recognizable by most anyone here. In most cases they (or the venue?) used so much distortion and maybe other effects that these wonderful musicians ended up with really harsh and ugly sounds. In one case the sound was really just downright unpleasant.

It kind of seems like this must have been the musicians' decisions, since I also heard a classical guitar player in this same venue who had really wonderful sound.
__________________
A few of my early attempts at recording: https://www.youtube.com/user/wcap07/featured
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 09-17-2014, 11:12 AM
Psalad Psalad is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: San Francisco bay area
Posts: 3,239
Default

No instrument or sound is sacred. The only thing sacred is the song.. the art... the music. Does the music need it? Do it. If not.. don't.
__________________
Music: http://mfassett.com

Taylor 710 sunburst
Epiphone ef-500m

...a few electrics
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 09-17-2014, 01:06 PM
mr. beaumont mr. beaumont is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 10,248
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by johnd View Post
But I suppose the argument would be "if you want effects, why not use an electric guitar"?
Because certain effects sound completely different on an acoustic versus an electric.
__________________
Jeff Matz, Jazz Guitar:

http://www.youtube.com/user/jeffreymatz
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 09-17-2014, 01:08 PM
Yamaha Man Yamaha Man is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,927
Default

A little bit of eq and chorus worked wonders for Stephen Still"s "Treetop Flyer".
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 09-17-2014, 01:24 PM
barefooter barefooter is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: West Virginia Hills
Posts: 6,310
Default

For me, mostly a straight acoustic sound through the PA. When I do add something, it is a hint of chorus and reverb.
__________________
Tom
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 09-17-2014, 01:24 PM
philjs philjs is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Halifax, NS, Canada
Posts: 1,970
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by johnd View Post
I'm not sure if looping really counts as an effect?
I can't play two acoustic guitars at once (never mind guitar and bouzar at the same time) so, trust me, it's an effect. And I'm sure Phil Keaggy would agree with me...

Phil
__________________
Solo Fingerstyle CDs:
Two Steps Forward, One Step Back (2021)
One Size Does Not Fit All (2018)

I play Crosby, Emerald, Larrivée, Lowden, Rainsong & Tacoma guitars.
Check out my Guitar Website. See guitar photos & info at my Guitars page.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 09-17-2014, 01:26 PM
Tarekith Tarekith is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Luxembourg
Posts: 80
Default

I run my acoustic through tons of effects, I don't have a problem with it at all. I use an acoustic because I enjoy playing it more than my electric, and it provides a different tone too.
__________________
Erik M.
http://InnerPortalStudio.com Professional Mastering & Mixdowns - Luxembourg
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 09-17-2014, 01:29 PM
johnd johnd is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 344
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by philjs View Post
I can't play two acoustic guitars at once (never mind guitar and bouzar at the same time) so, trust me, it's an effect. And I'm sure Phil Keaggy would agree with me...

Phil
I can't play and sing at the same time, but if I record each separately I wouldn't say it's an effect
__________________
Yamaha APX-500 - Crafter MD-80 12 Eq (12-string) - and a 20 year old crappy Jose masy mas classical!
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 09-17-2014, 01:31 PM
Irish Pennant Irish Pennant is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Viola Oregon
Posts: 1,612
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by McShepherd View Post
+1 to this.

However, in my own writing/playing, I find that the more interest I find in using effects, the more I'm really just wanting to play the piece electric instead of acoustic.
I have a song I recently composed that was first inspired by playing the electric but I moved it to the acoustic. 95% of my playing is done on an acoustic and that's the instrument I take to open mics. This song does have a couple of sections that are colored with a looper and effects.
__________________
The Blond
The Brunette
The Red Head
The Old Lady
Goldilocks
Flipper

"Sometimes I play a song I never heard before" Thelonious Monk
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 09-17-2014, 02:46 PM
BTF BTF is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,324
Default

Honestly, can anyone- electric or acoustic guitarist- finger pick an arpeggio through a Phase 90 and tell me it's not heavenly?!!!
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 09-17-2014, 02:55 PM
aknow aknow is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Nipomo, California
Posts: 3,901
Default

chorus or delay, slight, not overpowering.
Reply With Quote
Reply

  The Acoustic Guitar Forum > General Acoustic Guitar and Amplification Discussion > Acoustic Amplification






All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:11 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, The Acoustic Guitar Forum
vB Ad Management by =RedTyger=