|
View Poll Results: Which type of finish on a neck do you prefer, Satin or Gloss? | |||
Gloss Finish | 35 | 16.99% | |
Satin Finish | 130 | 63.11% | |
Don't Care | 37 | 17.96% | |
Other (Please Explain | 4 | 1.94% | |
Voters: 206. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools |
#46
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
I'm not sure what sterates are made of. Do sterates contain silica, or quartz?
__________________
woody b politically incorrect since 1964 |
#47
|
|||
|
|||
I guess I'm old enough to remember when a gloss neck was considered high end.
|
#48
|
|||
|
|||
Me too! But I love the way it feels! I got a new 2012 BTO and I am used to my old Taylor1997 neck because of this. I find it easier to play. I measured the neck carve and they are both the same. I measured the nut and they are both the same. So it is just a matter of breaking the new one in.
|
#49
|
|||
|
|||
Satin vs. Gloss
I do not like glossy necks - too much friction, even in cold weather. The necks I like the best on my guitars have a satin look and my hand slides easily on them. After I noticed that difference, I made sure that any guitar I ordered had a slippery neck. They look like satin, maybe they are.
As for bodies, I most definitely prefer glossy. Satin is cheaper to put on and it looks cheaper to me as well. That is why so many low end guitars have it. No difference in sound of course, not that I can tell.. |
#50
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#51
|
|||
|
|||
Two year-old zombie thread. Check dates, please.
|
#52
|
|||
|
|||
I have both but prefer satin.
|
#53
|
|||
|
|||
polished
My 15 year old Taylor neck is polished from use. I don't even remember how long ago I noticed, but the back of the head stock and the heel are still satin. If you prefer satin what'll you do when it becomes glossy??
|
#54
|
|||
|
|||
I prefer to put my own chemistry into a neck that i play.
Gibson doesn't give me that option, but Martin does, and I thank them for it. I get over it pretty easy though, but I can tell you definitely the Gibson necks are a tad bit stickier than the Martins. That won't stop me from buying Gibsons though Harmonics101 I'd take a zombie thread over rehash material ANY day of the week Seriously, i don't understand why anyone would rag on a resurrected thread ? Last edited by harmonics101; 08-14-2012 at 12:05 AM. |
#55
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
What is the problem some people seem to experience when a thread is resurrected? |
#56
|
|||
|
|||
My Martin D-18GE and D-28 Marquis had "matte" finished necks and headstocks.
I buffed them out with Virtuoso Polish to get a "semi-gloss". I think it looks better...more "finished".... and feels great.
__________________
1972 Martin D-28 1972 Martin D-18 2017 Martin D-18 2012 Martin 000-28H "Ambertone 1933"......"Rosebud" (The 000-28H is actually my wifes..:-) ) 2008 Fender American Standard Stratocaster |
#57
|
||||
|
||||
I am actually glad this came back up. I had forgot that I asked this question and just recently almost posted this again. I want to settle on a "standard" finish for the neck shaft yet still leave the option open for custom orders.
|
#58
|
||||
|
||||
Most finishes can have a "flattening paste" added to them but it probably depends on the manufacturer (of the finish.) I have used flattening pastes in both lacquer and urethanes. I know there was at least one builder that was offering a satin finish on his neck, but he was just not buffing the (gloss) finish and left the neck sanded. With that method over time the neck will gloss up with play as your hand will act like a buff.
|
#59
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#60
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Me too, that's how I do a Satin neck. |