The Acoustic Guitar Forum

Go Back   The Acoustic Guitar Forum > General Acoustic Guitar and Amplification Discussion > PLAY and Write

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 06-04-2013, 01:53 PM
Jackknifegypsy Jackknifegypsy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 526
Default Barre None

I haven't been able to make a perfect barre with the I finger for months on a less then 2" nut.

I've been able to make a full barre on a classical guitar, and it seems that my finger joints have become wedded to a 2" nut.

Is anyone aware of an "aid" to be placed over the index finger that would help 'even out' the two joints with the two pads on the finger to provide a straighter plane to lay across all the strings??

Wherever those two joints meet up with a string, they can't flatten enough to eliminate the buzz that ruins the barre. My fingers are very well developed from manual labor and the little muscles that constitute the 'pads' are like little biceps.

Any help, as always greatly appreciated.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-04-2013, 02:26 PM
ljguitar's Avatar
ljguitar ljguitar is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: wyoming
Posts: 42,604
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jackknifegypsy View Post
...Is anyone aware of an "aid" to be placed over the index finger that would help 'even out' the two joints with the two pads on the finger to provide a straighter plane to lay across all the strings??
JHi Jack...

I just adjust the amount of fingertip sticking out past the 6th string to keep the the joint(s) from falling directly on a string. No need for any 'aid'.

I also angle my finger across the fret, and not directly perpendicular.

Here's a video I did for friends and students...

Where's the pressure - CLIck

Hope it helps...


__________________

Baby #1.1
Baby #1.2
Baby #02
Baby #03
Baby #04
Baby #05

Larry's songs...

…Just because you've argued someone into silence doesn't mean you have convinced them…
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-04-2013, 04:01 PM
rick-slo's Avatar
rick-slo rick-slo is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: San Luis Obispo, CA
Posts: 17,235
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jackknifegypsy View Post
I haven't been able to make a perfect barre with the I finger for months on a less then 2" nut.
I've been able to make a full barre on a classical guitar, and it seems that my finger joints have become wedded to a 2" nut.
It is doubtful the 2" width spoiled your index finger for a narrower nut. Steel strings just require more fretting pressure due the higher string tension.

Extend the tip of the index finger beyond the fretboard to where barring all the strings is easiest. Roll the finger back some towards the thumb to get away from the finger joint creases. On some types of barres you can double up you second finger over the index finger
__________________
Derek Coombs
Youtube -> Website -> Music -> Tabs
Guitars by Mark Blanchard, Albert&Mueller, Paul Woolson, Collings, Composite Acoustics, and Derek Coombs

"Reality is that which when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away."

Woods hands pick by eye and ear
Made to one with pride and love
To be that we hold so dear
A voice from heavens above
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-04-2013, 04:12 PM
Paikon Paikon is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Thessaloniki Greece
Posts: 1,814
Default

Put the other fingers first of the chord and then the barre finger and press only the strings that are not covered by the 2,3 and 4 fingers
You have to practice it but it works and you have a more relaxed left hand.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-04-2013, 09:12 PM
ljguitar's Avatar
ljguitar ljguitar is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: wyoming
Posts: 42,604
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rick-slo View Post
It is doubtful the 2" width spoiled your index finger for a narrower nut. Steel strings just require more fretting pressure due the higher string tension.
Hi rick...

Sometimes.

The other difference is the radiused neck with the expanding fingerboard width which expands twice as far (nut to saddle width) as the classical counterpart.

All these contribute to a possible different technique for each instrument.


__________________

Baby #1.1
Baby #1.2
Baby #02
Baby #03
Baby #04
Baby #05

Larry's songs...

…Just because you've argued someone into silence doesn't mean you have convinced them…
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-04-2013, 09:39 PM
rick-slo's Avatar
rick-slo rick-slo is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: San Luis Obispo, CA
Posts: 17,235
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ljguitar View Post
Hi rick...

Sometimes.

The other difference is the radiused neck with the expanding fingerboard width which expands twice as far (nut to saddle width) as the classical counterpart.

All these contribute to a possible different technique for each instrument.

Most all classical guitars have flat fretboards. For decades I played a 1960s Ramirez 1a with a 2.1" width at the nut. Ramirez guitars (at least from that time period) have a fairly stiff action. That and the flat fretboard made it harder to barre way up the neck than some of my steel string guitars. I assume the OP was talking about barres played on the lower frets.
__________________
Derek Coombs
Youtube -> Website -> Music -> Tabs
Guitars by Mark Blanchard, Albert&Mueller, Paul Woolson, Collings, Composite Acoustics, and Derek Coombs

"Reality is that which when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away."

Woods hands pick by eye and ear
Made to one with pride and love
To be that we hold so dear
A voice from heavens above
Reply With Quote
Reply

  The Acoustic Guitar Forum > General Acoustic Guitar and Amplification Discussion > PLAY and Write






All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:48 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, The Acoustic Guitar Forum
vB Ad Management by =RedTyger=