The Acoustic Guitar Forum

Go Back   The Acoustic Guitar Forum > General Acoustic Guitar and Amplification Discussion > General Acoustic Guitar Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #16  
Old 04-07-2004, 12:24 PM
CollinEmory CollinEmory is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 56
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cpmusic
Sorry to ask the obvious, but did you look up on the heelblock for the label? That's where they put the model and serial number until around 1997 or so.

From the look of things, that's an early 915. The 600 series, if it existed, was mahogany back then.

All Taylors have bolt-on necks. There's never been one built with a dovetail or any other kind of glued joint.
Yes, I have looked everywhere.....there is no serial number....who knows about the mortise board joints they used to use?? the guitar does have a truss rod, so that has to terminate somewhere in there. I can't find any evidence whatsoever of a neck reset...so that would seem to cancel out any idea that the neck was replaced or an extra cap put on to cover the bolts....I dont know what to think yet....I know i like it....
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 04-07-2004, 12:25 PM
CollinEmory CollinEmory is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 56
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JNKLAZ
Do you know if it has a bolt on neck? the sticker would have covered this area. They started using those I believe early in 1976.
I can't find any bolts?...what were the early mortise board jointed necks like? could it be this?
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 04-07-2004, 12:34 PM
cpmusic's Avatar
cpmusic cpmusic is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Behind the Orange Curtain
Posts: 10,967
Default

Again, all Taylor guitars have bolt-on necks. The early ones used a mortise and tenon joint, but they were still held together with bolts. You can get some background at the article on Taylor at http://www.acousticguitar.com/issues...eature137.html.

The bolt holes are countersunk into the heelblock, and if you can't see the bolts then they've covered up with a label, a thin piece of wood, or possibly wooden plugs.
__________________
Chris
We all do better when we all do better.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 04-07-2004, 12:53 PM
JNKLAZ JNKLAZ is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 45
Default

Beg to differ with you CPMUSIC regarding the bolt on neck. Per Taylor's Timeline( see their site) Guitar #20179 is the latest Taylor "on record" to have a mortised neck. By #20229 the bolt-ons were standard. The guitar in question here could very well be early enough to ave a mortised joint.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 04-07-2004, 01:41 PM
cpmusic's Avatar
cpmusic cpmusic is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Behind the Orange Curtain
Posts: 10,967
Default

JNKLAZ, all that means that they used to cut the joint differently, not that they didn't use bolts. According to the article in Acoustic Guitar (see link above), all guitars with the Taylor name have a bolt-on neck, including the ones with the mortised joint. Bob Taylor posted here a while back to say the same thing.
__________________
Chris
We all do better when we all do better.
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 04-07-2004, 03:00 PM
Fish Whisperer Fish Whisperer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Hampton Roads
Posts: 165
Default

Hey, Collin. Long time no digitize.

Nice guitar, buddy! Still got the '87?

You makin' lemonade these days?

Guy
__________________
Some Rosewood
Some Maple
Some Mahogany
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 04-07-2004, 03:31 PM
Flunky51 Flunky51 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: West of The Missimuddy
Posts: 350
Default

Regarding the bolt-on debate...

There's an 1970's photo in the new Taylor book that shows the neck disassembled from the body. It shows the mortise joint (which actually looks like a dovetail) with two bolts prominently in view.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 04-07-2004, 10:00 PM
Rick Shepherd Rick Shepherd is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Southern California
Posts: 3,814
Default

You can see my 855 from 1979 in my collection picture, it is the model Neil Young purchased also back then. I am the original owner. That is a nice earlier guitar you have there.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 04-08-2004, 08:58 AM
CollinEmory CollinEmory is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 56
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fish Whisperer
Hey, Collin. Long time no digitize.

Nice guitar, buddy! Still got the '87?

You makin' lemonade these days?

Guy
Yep, thanks, still got the 87 play it nightly, I'm making lots of lemonade at my house. thanks for your lemon contribution!
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 04-08-2004, 09:00 AM
CollinEmory CollinEmory is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 56
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rick Shepherd
You can see my 855 from 1979 in my collection picture, it is the model Neil Young purchased also back then. I am the original owner. That is a nice earlier guitar you have there.
Awesome collection Rick! thanks
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 04-08-2004, 09:50 AM
Gratte Gratte is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 76
Default

Have you tried counting the lines on the top. I heard somewhere you can date wood by counting the rings. You multiply by a factor of 3 or 7 depending on the wood used.

If that doesn't work, try playing different songs on it - one from each year. You can download a list of the top 20 songs for each year from the Billboard website. If it's a 70's or 80's model, you may struggle to find acoustic tunes though. Play each one and see which song sounds best. That'll tell you what year the guitar was made in.

You might try a crosscheck of the result obtained under the second option with that obtained in the first or try playing a number of songs from each year. Sometimes songs are written a year or two before hitting the Billboard charts and this sometimes affects the accuracy of the test.

Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 04-09-2004, 01:58 PM
CollinEmory CollinEmory is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 56
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gratte
Have you tried counting the lines on the top. I heard somewhere you can date wood by counting the rings. You multiply by a factor of 3 or 7 depending on the wood used.

If that doesn't work, try playing different songs on it - one from each year. You can download a list of the top 20 songs for each year from the Billboard website. If it's a 70's or 80's model, you may struggle to find acoustic tunes though. Play each one and see which song sounds best. That'll tell you what year the guitar was made in.

You might try a crosscheck of the result obtained under the second option with that obtained in the first or try playing a number of songs from each year. Sometimes songs are written a year or two before hitting the Billboard charts and this sometimes affects the accuracy of the test.

I have tried all those methods and they still didn't work. I was told that 70's models were very durable. So, I tried the roof test. I dropped it off my office building and ran down to street level where low and behold it was still completely intact! if you think that's incredible...just wait, it gets better...I picked it up and started performing all of the 70's hot hits....during my BeeGee's Shadow Dancing number people started dropping change at my feet. By the end of the day I had enough to purchase an airline ticket to California and flew straight to Bob's office whereupon seeing this remarkable guitar he immediately offered my a "full ride" with Taylor and (all the free guitars I want) plus a condo in the old Lemon Grove building... I decided to turn down the offer and come back to Tennessee....
Reply With Quote
Reply

  The Acoustic Guitar Forum > General Acoustic Guitar and Amplification Discussion > General Acoustic Guitar Discussion






All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:07 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, The Acoustic Guitar Forum
vB Ad Management by =RedTyger=