The Acoustic Guitar Forum

Go Back   The Acoustic Guitar Forum > General Acoustic Guitar and Amplification Discussion > Acoustic Amplification

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 07-25-2017, 11:12 AM
Wags Wags is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Pacific NW
Posts: 231
Default Fishman Aura Spectrum DI Preamp Experiences

Sorry if this has been discussed already. Couldn't find much info in a search. I have an 314CE with the older ES. I really like it for some situations but the amplified sound could be a lot better. Anyone using this preamp? How do you like it?

Thanks.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-25-2017, 11:31 AM
Wags Wags is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Pacific NW
Posts: 231
Default

Ops, guess I posted in the wrong section. Newbie... Found some threads. Still interested in opinions. Cheers
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-25-2017, 10:38 PM
SpruceTop SpruceTop is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Rochester, New York
Posts: 12,358
Default

CORRECTION: I reread your OP and see your Taylor has the ES1 system. I've tried one of the ES1.2/ES1.3 Taylors I had with the original Fishman Aura Blender Pedal and didn't get much of an improvement in tone. I tried it with the full ES1 soundboard/magnetic sensors engaged and with just the magnetic pickup engaged.
__________________
Martin HD-28 Sunburst/Trance M-VT Phantom
Martin D-18/UltraTonic
Adamas I 2087GT-8
Ovation Custom Legend LX
Guild F-212XL STD
Huss & Dalton TD-R
Taylor 717e
Taylor 618e
Taylor 614ce
Larrivee D-50M/HiFi
Larrivee D-40R Blue Grass Special/HiFi
Larrivee D-40R Sunburst
Larrivee C-03R TE/Trance M-VT Phantom
RainSong BI-DR1000N2
Emerald X20
Yamaha FGX5
Republic Duolian/Schatten NR-2

Last edited by SpruceTop; 07-26-2017 at 08:54 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-25-2017, 11:08 PM
guitaniac guitaniac is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 6,713
Default

The ES-1 system is a mag inclusive system, so ToneDexter wouldn't be recommended. (Its recommended for piezo pickups only.)

The first generation ES guitars were somewhat inconsistent. Some were pretty solid sounding, but others had an excessively hollow, in-the-well sound. If you have one of the latter, I doubt that the Aura Spectrum will do you much good either.

I recall that some folks got so frustrated with their ES guitars that they retrofitted other pickups. It would be possible to leave the ES system in the guitar (for future resale, possibly) and add a passive K&K Pure Mini or some other passive piezo pickup which would work well with ToneDexter.

Last edited by guitaniac; 07-25-2017 at 11:44 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-25-2017, 11:38 PM
guitaniac guitaniac is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 6,713
Default

Oops. Deleted duplication.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-26-2017, 02:11 AM
Cuki79 Cuki79 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: France
Posts: 3,008
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SpruceTop View Post
I have one but haven't used it in a long time. It should help the tone of your older Taylor's UST (pre-ES 1, I assume?). All you need to do is find the right Aura Image(s) that give you a nice tone. Let me suggest you look at the new ToneDexter device that enables you to make Impulse Response Images, IR, (which is what an Aura Image is) so you can get as closer to the amplified tone you want to hear. Look for the ToneDexter threads in this AGF Amplified section.
Wags

if your Taylor 314ce has ES1, Fishman Aura will not work. Aura is meant for piezo and mainly UST. I have a 414ce from 2011 and the Aura pedal.

I don't remember when Taylor introduced the ES1 but it is somewhere around 2003. Taylor ES2 was introduced around 2014 I guess.

So if your guitar is between those dates: No Aura for you.

Note that Taylor has a program ($300) to upgrade to ES2 that is known to work well with Tonedexter for example.
https://www.taylorguitars.com/support/service-packages

Cuki
__________________
Martin 00-18V Goldplus + internal mic (2003)
Martin OM-28V + HFN + internal mic (1999)
Eastman E6OM (2019) Trance Audio Amulet
Yamaha FGX-412 (1998)

Gibson Les Paul Standard 1958 Reissue (2013)
Fender Stratocaster American Vintage 1954 (2014)
http://acousticir.free.fr/
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-26-2017, 05:19 AM
guitaniac guitaniac is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 6,713
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cuki79 View Post
Wags


Note that Taylor has a program ($300) to upgrade to ES2 that is known to work well with Tonedexter for example.
https://www.taylorguitars.com/support/service-packages

Cuki
Cuki's suggestion here might be the best option, if you really dislike your present pickup. It certainly wouldn't harm the resale value of your guitar, and the ES2 system is a piezo system which would be compatible with ToneDexter, if the ES2 alone doesn't satisfy your taste in tone.

I was thinking about my earlier suggestion of retrofitting a Pure Mini and it occurs to me that that procedure could get complicated if you would want to keep the original jack in the guitar. The Pure Mini has three separate piezo elements whose leads would have to be disconnected from the jack which they come with and soldered to the tip post of the Taylor jack (after the ES1 lead was disconnected).

A retrofit of something like Fishman's AG series undersaddle pickup would be easier as there would only be one hot lead and one ground lead to connect to the original Taylor jack. Still, I think the solution of having Taylor install the ES2 makes the most sense.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-26-2017, 08:14 AM
guitaniac guitaniac is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 6,713
Default

Another (of many) negatives regarding an Aura Spectrum/ES1 combo is that the Spectrum only has an available gain of +2db. The original ES1 output signal was rather low and needed a lot of gain applied to get up to line level when running a regular guitar cable out (which would be necessary when running to the Spectrum). As a soundman during that era, I recall that those ES1 signals needed a hefty boost when running a regular guitar cable out to a line input. The power supply for the original ES1 was only 3v (two 1.5v batteries in series), if I recall correctly.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-26-2017, 02:03 PM
Wags Wags is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Pacific NW
Posts: 231
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by guitaniac View Post
Another (of many) negatives regarding an Aura Spectrum/ES1 combo is that the Spectrum only has an available gain of +2db. The original ES1 output signal was rather low and needed a lot of gain applied to get up to line level when running a regular guitar cable out (which would be necessary when running to the Spectrum). As a soundman during that era, I recall that those ES1 signals needed a hefty boost when running a regular guitar cable out to a line input. The power supply for the original ES1 was only 3v (two 1.5v batteries in series), if I recall correctly.
Mine takes a 9v, same as my 814. The Taylor upgrade seems to make the most sense. You get the "refresh" thrown in as well. I'm not into the 314 that much now and I'd probably get a lot of the $300 back in value added.

You need to ship the guitar to them, I suppose. That makes me a little nervous.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-26-2017, 02:15 PM
martingitdave martingitdave is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Chicago
Posts: 11,391
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wags View Post
Mine takes a 9v, same as my 814. The Taylor upgrade seems to make the most sense. You get the "refresh" thrown in as well. I'm not into the 314 that much now and I'd probably get a lot of the $300 back in value added.

You need to ship the guitar to them, I suppose. That makes me a little nervous.
I agree with Cuki. If you like your Taylor but dislike the pickup, the ES2 is an improvement, in my opinion. Some others disagree, so do your homework. By the time you're done messing with various pedals and preamps, you could have sent the guitar to Taylor for the ES2.
__________________
"Lift your head and smile at trouble. You'll find happiness someday."
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 07-30-2017, 06:01 AM
j3ffr0 j3ffr0 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,938
Default

I had one and didn't like it with my 314 with ES1.3 or Alvarez with piezo or nylon strings with piezo + mic

The EQ and compression were okay, but I ended up not using the images at all and eventually sold it.
__________________
Alvarez: DY61
Huss and Dalton: DS Crossroads, 00-SP
Kenny Hill: Heritage, Performance
Larrivee: CS09 Matt Thomas Limited
Taylor: 314ce, 356e, Baritone 8
Timberline: T60HGc
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 07-30-2017, 08:43 AM
mwalk mwalk is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: IL
Posts: 967
Default

I don't think the Aura system is meant for anything other than UST pickups. Or at least it's not optimal. The Aura allows you to blend "images" of your guitar model to create a more natural sound. I like it a lot with my Matrix pickups. It helps take out the quack, too. I'm admittedly not all that familiar with Taylor's electronics, but I'm not sure the Aura DI is the way to go.
__________________
The Deep Hollow
#3 Album on the Folk DJ Charts Apr 2016
Winners of American Songwriter Magazine's 30th Anniversary Song Contest
"An incredibly promising debut" -Maverick Magazine
www.thedeephollow.com
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 07-30-2017, 05:05 PM
martingitdave martingitdave is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Chicago
Posts: 11,391
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mwalk View Post
I don't think the Aura system is meant for anything other than UST pickups. Or at least it's not optimal. The Aura allows you to blend "images" of your guitar model to create a more natural sound. I like it a lot with my Matrix pickups. It helps take out the quack, too. I'm admittedly not all that familiar with Taylor's electronics, but I'm not sure the Aura DI is the way to go.


You're correct. In fact, not just any UST, a Fishman Matrix UST. That's how the images are computed. Any other input source is likely to generate suboptimal results.
__________________
"Lift your head and smile at trouble. You'll find happiness someday."
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 07-30-2017, 09:19 PM
Wags Wags is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Pacific NW
Posts: 231
Default

I'm sending my 314 to Taylor for the ES upgrade. Hate shipping a guitar but with the insurance I'll ok if anything happens.

Last edited by Wags; 07-30-2017 at 09:24 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 07-30-2017, 09:35 PM
Petty1818 Petty1818 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 4,579
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wags View Post
I'm sending my 314 to Taylor for the ES upgrade. Hate shipping a guitar but with the insurance I'll ok if anything happens.
It's a shame that Taylor does not offer this upgrade through certified, Taylor dealers. Many of them have techs/luthiers who are certified to work on Taylor guitars. I would 100% upgrade my Taylor to the ES2 if this was the case. My Taylor already had the ES1 holes so it would only be the saddle installation and that doesn't bother me.
Reply With Quote
Reply

  The Acoustic Guitar Forum > General Acoustic Guitar and Amplification Discussion > Acoustic Amplification






All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:07 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, The Acoustic Guitar Forum
vB Ad Management by =RedTyger=