The Acoustic Guitar Forum

Go Back   The Acoustic Guitar Forum > General Acoustic Guitar and Amplification Discussion > RECORD

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 06-27-2015, 08:42 PM
schwa schwa is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 123
Default Does anyone use a "reflection shield"

A lot of folks mention how important room treatment is to successful recording, but all of my living space is dedicated to living. I can't dedicate space to recording, so any treatment needs to be temporary.

I have seen things like these:



Has anyone used them to good effect?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-27-2015, 09:11 PM
Doug Young's Avatar
Doug Young Doug Young is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Mountain View, CA
Posts: 9,916
Default

What would you use it for? I have a friend who used one for a CD, and it seemed ok, but I didn't hear a without/without comparison. If you're recording guitar, this will only let you do one mic, so presumably mono. Recording in stereo usually sounds far better, depending on how you'll use the track.

To me, I'd go for something like this, which we were just talking about in a different thread:

http://www.homebrewedmusic.com/2011/...adband-panels/

cheaper, more flexible, probably gives you better acoustics
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-27-2015, 09:49 PM
rick-slo's Avatar
rick-slo rick-slo is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: San Luis Obispo, CA
Posts: 17,235
Default

About eight years ago I tried a couple of seElectronics reflection shields
http://www.seelectronics.com/reflexion-filter-pro

First, forward addressed mikes won't fit in it in the right location. Second, I thought it colored the guitar sound in a slightly odd way.


 
__________________
Derek Coombs
Youtube -> Website -> Music -> Tabs
Guitars by Mark Blanchard, Albert&Mueller, Paul Woolson, Collings, Composite Acoustics, and Derek Coombs

"Reality is that which when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away."

Woods hands pick by eye and ear
Made to one with pride and love
To be that we hold so dear
A voice from heavens above
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-27-2015, 10:15 PM
DupleMeter DupleMeter is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 1,764
Default

I find them useful. You need to get a good one that really doesn't have any reflective properties. I don't remember which one I bought, but I tried a few before finding one that really worked.

I've used mine for vocals & for stereo micing a guitar. To be honest, I like it for vocals better as I like a little more room in the guitar tone...but in a less than ideal room it could be a life-saver.
__________________
-Steve

1927 Martin 00-21
1986 Fender Strat
1987 Ibanez RG560
1988 Fender Fretless J Bass
1991 Washburn HB-35s
1995 Taylor 812ce
1996 Taylor 510c (custom)
1996 Taylor 422-R (Limited Edition)
1997 Taylor 810-WMB (Limited Edition)
1998 Taylor 912c (Custom)
2019 Fender Tele
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-27-2015, 11:37 PM
donh donh is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Ohio
Posts: 2,412
Default

Wouldn't that be an "absorption" device?

It is the near-field "reflections" one wants to be rid of.

tip for the time or monetarily challenged: laundry can work a treat
.
__________________
-donh-

*everything* is a tone control
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-28-2015, 04:20 AM
Andy Howell Andy Howell is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,097
Default

I use an SE device which is now known as the Reflection Filter Pro. Hope my experience helps!

I bought this to tame reflections in my office/recording space in a new house. It worked to some extent but not enough. I then put up some acoustic treatment tiles which tightened up the high room.

Now the reflection filter really does work.

First off, it is very flexible and I have no problems adjusting to get the mic position right; you just have to play around with it a bit.

I use a large diaphragm mic, a Mojave 301 or a Rode N2.

The Mojave is used in an Omni setting and even though it backs up against the reflection filter this is a markedly better sound than in straight cardioid mode.

I have several neighbours who are recording musicians. My only problem with the filter is that they are always borrowing it for vocals!

For vocals it really has an impact. For instruments I am not so sure — acoustic treatment was the most effective thing I did.
__________________
------
AJ Lucas Pavilion Sweep fan fret
Santa Cruz OM/E (European Pre War)
Martin J40
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-28-2015, 07:54 AM
Ty Ford Ty Ford is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 1,357
Default

When you stop and thing about it, these are supposed to be used on the back side of the mic, its "deaf" side, if you will.

I'm a lot more concerned about a mic picking up the room. That would be sound coming in the "live" or front side of the mic.

The physics just didn't make much sense to me.

Regards,

Ty Ford
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-28-2015, 10:03 AM
runamuck runamuck is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,295
Default

I own one and used it for a time. As I grew more discerning I could hear a strange quality in my recordings whenever I used it - kind of a phasing sound.

I now use packing blankets behind and in front the mic when I want to reduce the ambiance of the room.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-28-2015, 10:39 AM
sdelsolray sdelsolray is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 6,956
Default

I bought a pair of those about 6 years ago. Tried them a few times. Yuck. Haven't used them since.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06-28-2015, 10:55 AM
H165 H165 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: The Woods; OC, CA
Posts: 3,071
Default

I've used one on a hand-held mic boom, directly up against the back and sides of a large diaphragm mic, while recording individual acoustic solos during a live jam in a reflective room. It was beneficial to the recording in that particular situation, but it certainly didn't change it to a studio recording.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 06-30-2015, 01:56 PM
MikeBmusic MikeBmusic is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: On the Mass/NH border
Posts: 6,663
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ty Ford View Post
When you stop and thing about it, these are supposed to be used on the back side of the mic, its "deaf" side, if you will.

I'm a lot more concerned about a mic picking up the room. That would be sound coming in the "live" or front side of the mic.

The physics just didn't make much sense to me.

Regards,

Ty Ford
They are designed so that the voice output doesn't go out to the room and then reflect back to the back/side walls and then into the mic.
That's why they don't work particularly well for an acoustic guitar - more of the sound goes 'around' the reflection filter.
__________________
Mike

My music: https://mikebirchmusic.bandcamp.com

2020 Taylor 324ceBE
2017 Taylor 114ce-N
2012 Taylor 310ce
2011 Fender CD140SCE
Ibanez 12 string a/e
73(?) Epiphone 6830E 6 string

72 Fender Telecaster
Epiphone Dot Studio
Epiphone LP Jr
Chinese Strat clone

Kala baritone ukulele
Seagull 'Merlin'
Washburn Mandolin
Luna 'tatoo' a/e ukulele
antique banjolin
Squire J bass
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 06-30-2015, 04:53 PM
Bob Womack's Avatar
Bob Womack Bob Womack is offline
Guitar Gourmet
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Between Clever and Stupid
Posts: 27,078
Default

One of the recording suites in our complex has a vocal booth with a window that is too large, causing reflections. We bought a good reflection shield and tried it out in an effort to improve things. We put it up and did A/B recordings. In the unanimous opinion of five of us engineers, the shield simply added it's own objectionable reflections.

Bob
__________________
"It is said, 'Go not to the elves for counsel for they will say both no and yes.' "
Frodo Baggins to Gildor Inglorion, The Fellowship of the Ring

THE MUSICIAN'S ROOM (my website)
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 06-30-2015, 11:49 PM
Fran Guidry Fran Guidry is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Walnut Creek, CA
Posts: 3,712
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob Womack View Post
One of the recording suites in our complex has a vocal booth with a window that is too large, causing reflections. We bought a good reflection shield and tried it out in an effort to improve things. We put it up and did A/B recordings. In the unanimous opinion of five of us engineers, the shield simply added it's own objectionable reflections.

Bob
For a time there was a site with a comparison between a Reflexxion and a pair of OC703 panels rigged up in the same relative position. The comb filtering of the Reflexxion was obvious and not pleasant. The OC703 panels behind the mic actually reduced the room reflection sound and inspired my simple efforts: http://www.homebrewedmusic.com/2011/...adband-panels/

The idea of "protecting" the back (and sides) of the mic makes sense when you think about the issues of off-axis frequency response and the degree of attenuation that occurs in a "directional" mic. It's not like the "dead" side is actually not capturing any sound, it's actually only offering some attenuation ... at some frequencies.

And a pair of 4x2 panels are wide enough to filter the output of a guitar noticeably.

Fran
__________________
E ho`okani pila kakou ma Kaleponi
Slack Key in California - www.kaleponi.com
My YouTube clips
The Homebrewed Music Blog
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 07-01-2015, 12:35 AM
Mobilemike Mobilemike is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: NYC
Posts: 1,539
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob Womack View Post
One of the recording suites in our complex has a vocal booth with a window that is too large, causing reflections. We bought a good reflection shield and tried it out in an effort to improve things. We put it up and did A/B recordings. In the unanimous opinion of five of us engineers, the shield simply added it's own objectionable reflections.

Bob
This. I've tried several of these and never been impressed.

Another issue is that the foam on these will do a pretty good job absorbing high frequencies, but isn't thick enough to even begin to absorb mid or low frequencies. So the highs go away and everything else builds up and your recordings end up sounding muddy and tubby.

Real room treatment is key and you can DIY it not too expensively. Get some Owens Corning 703 insulation and cover it with whatever breathable fabric you like and hang it in your room. Will work a lot better.

-Mike

Last edited by Mobilemike; 07-02-2015 at 03:09 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 07-01-2015, 01:05 AM
Andy Howell Andy Howell is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,097
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mobilemike View Post
This. I've tried several of these and never been impressed.

Another issue is that the foam on these will do a pretty good job absorbing high frequencies, but isn't thick enough to even begin to absorb mod or low frequencies. So the highs go away and everything else builds up
and your recordings end up sounding muddy and tubby.

Real room treatment is key and you can DIY it not too expensively. Get some Owens Corning 703 insulation and cover it with whatever breathable fabric you like and hang it in your room. Will work a lot better.

-Mike
As I mentioned earlier, mine only came into its own after the room has been treated. I think some people are just expecting to much from these.
__________________
------
AJ Lucas Pavilion Sweep fan fret
Santa Cruz OM/E (European Pre War)
Martin J40
Reply With Quote
Reply

  The Acoustic Guitar Forum > General Acoustic Guitar and Amplification Discussion > RECORD






All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:35 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, The Acoustic Guitar Forum
vB Ad Management by =RedTyger=