The Acoustic Guitar Forum

Go Back   The Acoustic Guitar Forum > Other Discussions > Open Mic

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #16  
Old 03-16-2018, 11:00 AM
Acousticado's Avatar
Acousticado Acousticado is offline
Anticipation Junkie
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Oh, Canada!
Posts: 17,642
Default



This one is my dream Mustang in every way, including color. Likely, the closest I’ll come is a 1:18 scale diecast model that looks exactly like that.
__________________
Tom
'21 Martin D-18 Standard | '02 Taylor 814c | '18 Taylor 214ceDLX | '18 Taylor 150e-12 | '78 Ibanez Dread (First acoustic) | '08 CA Cargo | '02 Fender Strat American '57 RI
My original songs
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 03-16-2018, 12:03 PM
Nyghthawk Nyghthawk is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 3,239
Default

I are confused. The definition of coupe is a two door hard top. The Mustang has always been a coupe. In fact Mustang coupe seems redundant to me.
__________________
Epiphone Masterbilt Hummingbird
Epiphone Masterbilt AJ-500RENS

Teach us what ways have light, what gifts have worth.
Edna St. Vincent Millay
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 03-16-2018, 12:13 PM
SMan SMan is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Latte Land
Posts: 3,181
Default

When I met my wife she had a 69 Mach I with a 390 4 speed. It was a heavy tank and handled poorly. In a straight line it was fast for its day. Working on it was a pain too. I had to remove the valve covers to change the plugs. The big block made it nose heavy and the brakes back then were mediocre at best. Boy was it a good looking car though. (I had a 70 2dr 429 T-Bird at the time which also was a poor handling car.)

I also owned a 67 GTO 400 4 speed. As much as I like the old "muscle cars" and the nostalgia associated with them they really don't hold a candle to today's cars in terms of reliability, handling, and power. (I currently have a 69 El Camino but modernized it a bit with a LT1 Corvette engine.) My 16' Challenger is far faster, handles better, produces less emissions and gets close to 30 mpg on the highway.

__________________
Steve

Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 03-16-2018, 12:32 PM
RP's Avatar
RP RP is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Charlottesville, VA
Posts: 21,284
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nyghthawk View Post
I are confused. The definition of coupe is a two door hard top. The Mustang has always been a coupe. In fact Mustang coupe seems redundant to me.
Color me confused as well....
__________________
Emerald X20
Emerald X20-12
Fender Robert Cray Stratocaster
Martin D18 Ambertone
Martin 000-15sm
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 03-16-2018, 12:39 PM
HHP HHP is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 29,351
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RP View Post
Color me confused as well....
Didn't Ford and others make the distinction? They offered "hardtop" and "fastback" models. Same with Torinos.
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 03-16-2018, 03:00 PM
HodgdonExtreme HodgdonExtreme is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 1,607
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nyghthawk View Post
I are confused. The definition of coupe is a two door hard top. The Mustang has always been a coupe. In fact Mustang coupe seems redundant to me.
Let me try to help:

1966 Coupe/Notchback:



1966 Fastback:



1967 Coupe/Notchback:



1967 Fastback:



1973 Coupe/Notchback:




1973 Fastback:



1977 Coupe/Notchback (yuck!):



1977 Fastback (not much better, these were DARK years for the Mustang!):




1989 Coupe/Notchback:



1989 Fastback/Hatchback:



1994 Coupe/notchback (no fastback offered, though this design blurs the lines between the two):



2004 Coupe/Notchback (no fastback offered, again blurring the distinction):



2014 fastback (no coupe offered):




The 2015-2017 Mustang Fastback (no coupe offered):



Hope this helps!

Last edited by HodgdonExtreme; 03-16-2018 at 03:25 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 03-16-2018, 03:22 PM
HodgdonExtreme HodgdonExtreme is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 1,607
Default

Now for the bonus round:

Who can identify this body style???







Gawd, what a gorgeous, gorgeous automobile....


Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 03-16-2018, 03:52 PM
Brucebubs Brucebubs is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Eden, Australia
Posts: 17,792
Default

Great spread of Mustang pictures.
The original was beautiful from day 1.
There was a period there where they were just plain awful but they've come full circle.

The 1st ship load here in Australia a few years back were all sold before it arrived.... they even tested them as Police cars here.

__________________
Brucebubs

1972 - Takamine D-70
2014 - Alvarez ABT60 Baritone
2015 - Kittis RBJ-195 Jumbo
2012 - Dan Dubowski#61
2018 - Rickenbacker 4003 Fireglo
2020 - Gibson Custom Shop Historic 1957 SJ-200
2021 - Epiphone 'IBG' Hummingbird
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 03-16-2018, 03:59 PM
HHP HHP is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 29,351
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HodgdonExtreme View Post
Now for the bonus round:

Who can identify this body style???
The BMW and Ferrari would be "Shooting Brakes"
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 03-16-2018, 07:55 PM
HodgdonExtreme HodgdonExtreme is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 1,607
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HHP View Post
The BMW and Ferrari would be "Shooting Brakes"
Yep!

Why do think the crossfire and Jag aren't?
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 03-16-2018, 07:58 PM
HHP HHP is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 29,351
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HodgdonExtreme View Post
Yep!

Why do think the crossfire and Jag aren't?
A shooting brake usually has a squared off back, the Chrysler and Jag have a sloping back
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 03-16-2018, 09:23 PM
Steve DeRosa Steve DeRosa is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Staten Island, NY - for now
Posts: 15,049
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HodgdonExtreme View Post
...My favorite style Mustang would be the 64.5-66 fastback:



Last, while I'm on my soapbox... I think GM's approach to the new millennium V8 engine (the Gen III/IV smallblock "LS" V8) is far superior to the crazy complicated and HUGE OHC Ford "modular" approach.

GM 6.2L V8 (440hp) on left, Ford 5.0L V8 (435hp) on right:



The GM is (way) smaller, lighter and has 1/2 as many moving parts.
Former die-hard Ford guy here, going back to when that little black beauty first came to market...

As much as many GM folks consider the LS Series a modern iteration of the iconic small-block Chevy V8 dating to 1955, for us old Blue-Oval fans who attended the drags at the height of the mid''60s FX/Super Stock wars, the modular V8 is a latter-day rendition of the legendary 427 SOHC. In case you're not familiar, the "Cammer" (as it was commonly called) was developed to compete against the Mopar 426 Hemi on the NASCAR circuit; banned from oval-track competition it was quickly adopted by forward-looking drag racers, who would put it to use in everything from match-race Super Stock and Factory Experimental cars, to A/Gas Supercharged coupes, to nitro-burning first-generation doorslammer Funny Cars and Top Fuel dragsters. Unmatched in its day, the SOHC was/is a potent package even by today's standards; rated at 625 HP with dual quads on pump gas, factory-backed racers like Gas Ronda, Hubert Platt, and Don Nicholson were routinely able to extract well over 750 ponies - which, in a lightweight '65 fastback Mustang or alfered-wheelbase Falcon/Comet, had no problem nudging the nine-second bracket at ~140 MPH. Priced out of the street-muscle market (they were a $3000 option in 1967 - and Ford was losing money even at that price) they became a dominant force in the nitro ranks through the late-60's: Connie Kalitta would sweep the '67 NHRA/AHRA/NASCAR Winernationals "Triple Crown" in his Top Fueler, Jack Chrisman's Mercury Comet S/XS Funny Car would turn an unheard-of 7.60 at Indy later that year (a full half-second quicker than the nearest competitor), and Mickey Thompson would design the first "modern" narrow-frame Funny Car around a Cammer and a '69 Mustang body. FYI they're literally worth their (considerable) weight in gold these days - and such is their cult popularity that retrofit kits are available for the "mod motor" which duplicate the appearance of the '60s original - just the ticket for the resto-mod guys looking to clone a match-bash FX'er, but with modern reliability and 150+ pounds less weight on the front end...

Those were the days...
__________________
"Mistaking silence for weakness and contempt for fear is the final, fatal error of a fool"
- Sicilian proverb (paraphrased)
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 03-16-2018, 09:41 PM
Otterhound Otterhound is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 4,411
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HodgdonExtreme View Post
Last, while I'm on my soapbox... I think GM's approach to the new millennium V8 engine (the Gen III/IV smallblock "LS" V8) is far superior to the crazy complicated and HUGE OHC Ford "modular" approach.

GM 6.2L V8 (440hp) on left, Ford 5.0L V8 (435hp) on right:



The GM is (way) smaller, lighter and has 1/2 as many moving parts.
And it only needs an extra 72 cubic inches to produce the same horsepower . Now that is progress .
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 03-16-2018, 11:34 PM
The Growler The Growler is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 8,150
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Otterhound View Post
No sedan since there never has been a Mustang sedan .
A non fastback coupe Mustang along the lines of the original . 2 doors with a vertical rear glass and a trunk lid .
You want a coupe and not a fastback. Sedans have four doors.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 03-17-2018, 01:35 PM
Herb Hunter Herb Hunter is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Maine
Posts: 18,560
Default

The term, coupe, generally refers to 2-door car as opposed to a sedan which has 4 doors. Therefore, a fastback Mustang is a coupe. That is not to say that the term is misused to such an extent that one can be forgiven for being uncertain as to its definition.

coupe1 | ko͞op | (also coupé | ko͞oˈpā | )
noun

1 a car with a fixed roof and two doors.
2 historical a four-wheeled enclosed carriage for two passengers and a driver.
3 an end compartment in a railroad car, with seats on only one side.
Reply With Quote
Reply

  The Acoustic Guitar Forum > Other Discussions > Open Mic






All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:46 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, The Acoustic Guitar Forum
vB Ad Management by =RedTyger=