The Acoustic Guitar Forum

Go Back   The Acoustic Guitar Forum > General Acoustic Guitar and Amplification Discussion > General Acoustic Guitar Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 11-03-2013, 11:15 AM
SalFromChatham's Avatar
SalFromChatham SalFromChatham is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 7,783
Default Norlin Gibsons and sterotypes...

I just came from Guitar Center in Springfield NJ, where I came across the following Norlin-era Gibson for $1200. I have heard how they are the worst and are to be avoided. After today I say that you must try them all before making a judgement. This specific model needed a neck reset- it a toothpick left for a saddle, and the action was a little high. But... Man... to quote Eddie Vegas, "this thing here is a **** tone rocket!"

I guess it goes to show you that specific specimens vary, and sterotypes can be wrong.

__________________
i got tired of updating my guitars.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-03-2013, 11:47 AM
brian a. brian a. is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Wasatch Mountains
Posts: 2,706
Default

I would agree. Many and possibly most Gibsons from that era were built like tanks. BUT, some (maybe a few) are really stellar. I am happy you found one of the stellar ones!!!! Congratulations!!!!
__________________
Acoustics: Martins 1936 00-18, 1958 00-28G, 000-18GE, OM-1, J12-65, B-65, Olson SJ, Dobro Duolian
Electrics: Callaham S-model, Sadowsky Vintage P/J bass, Gibson '58 Historic Les Paul, Gibson '59 Historic ES-335, Afri-Can
Art: http://www.brianandersongallery.com/
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-03-2013, 11:50 AM
Irish Dave Irish Dave is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 634
Default

I have said the same thing frequently here on the forum, but stereotypes, like prejudices, often die hard.
__________________
________________________

https://www.facebook.com/pages/Modli...23585177732114
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-03-2013, 12:03 PM
Doubleneck Doubleneck is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 6,433
Default

There is a 1969 Norlin acoustic at my local shop its very nice and still set up pretty well. Have a Norlin 1975 Les Paul Custom. Great guitar. Good thing myths do is make some good guitars cheap.
__________________
Steve
2020 McKnight Grand Recording - Cedar Top
2005 McKnight SS Dred
2001 Michael Keller Koa Baby
2014 Godin Inuk
2012 Deering B6 Openback Banjo
2012 Emerald Acoustic Doubleneck
2012 Rainsong JM1000 Black Ice
2009 Wechter Pathmaker 9600 LTD
1982 Yairi D-87 Doubleneck
1987 Ovation Collectors
1993 Ovation Collectors
1967 J-45 Gibson
1974 20th Annivers. Les Paul Custom
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-03-2013, 01:33 PM
zombywoof zombywoof is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 9,367
Default

A 1969 Gibson while being overbuilt compared to one made as late as 1967 is still a far cry from the tanks built from 1971 on. The electrics were a whole other ballgame. Gibson's R&D guys were working overtime and came up with some very interesting instruments.

I do though agree that blanket statements can be dangerous. And opinions do change. A while back I got a hold of one of those 1960s Fender acoustics with the Strat headstock and the broomstick running through it. While it was a heavy as I recalled it also did not sound near as bad as my memory had it. How many folks here recall how they could not wait to dump their Harmony Sovereign for a "good" guitar and then thirty-five years later get a hold of one of those Harmony's and think this is a flippin' really good sounding box.

The thing about Norlin Gibsons is according to the common wisdom they generally sucked but a few gems managed to sneak out of Kalamazoo. But it seems that everybody who buys one manages to find one of those elusive gems. I am sorry but the vast majority of those I have gotten my hands on (and I am old enough to have played them when they were brand spanking new) sounded like they were stuffed with old t-shirts.
__________________
"You start off playing guitars to get girls & end up talking with middle-aged men about your fingernails" - Ed Gerhard
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-03-2013, 02:05 PM
brian a. brian a. is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Wasatch Mountains
Posts: 2,706
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by zombywoof View Post
The thing about Norlin Gibsons is according to the common wisdom they generally sucked but a few gems managed to sneak out of Kalamazoo. But it seems that everybody who buys one manages to find one of those elusive gems. I am sorry but the vast majority of those I have gotten my hands on (and I am old enough to have played them when they were brand spanking new) sounded like they were stuffed with old t-shirts.
I'm old enough to agree. Maybe only the "good" ones have survived all these years, while the "bad" ones got beat up, broken, smashed or burned on stage or for videos.!?!?!?!
__________________
Acoustics: Martins 1936 00-18, 1958 00-28G, 000-18GE, OM-1, J12-65, B-65, Olson SJ, Dobro Duolian
Electrics: Callaham S-model, Sadowsky Vintage P/J bass, Gibson '58 Historic Les Paul, Gibson '59 Historic ES-335, Afri-Can
Art: http://www.brianandersongallery.com/
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-03-2013, 02:16 PM
HHP HHP is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 29,351
Default

Be funny if after the $500 neck set and other work, it was found to be a perfect example of Norlin-era Gibson sound.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-03-2013, 02:28 PM
sfden1 sfden1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 4,009
Default

Often when someone posts a thread asking for feedback on a Norlin era guitar that they're considering buying, and it's clear they can't play it first, they will usually receive the advice to go elsewhere. I've given that advice myself,

I think we all (or most of us anyway) realize that there can be good Gibson's from that era, but if you can't try it before buying, your just rolling the dice.

Personally, I've yet to find a 70's Gibson I've really liked, but would never say that there aren't good ones to be found.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-03-2013, 02:33 PM
Bob Womack's Avatar
Bob Womack Bob Womack is offline
Guitar Gourmet
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Between Clever and Stupid
Posts: 27,060
Default

True. True.

This little number

('74 small-script Kalamazoo Standard) is a fine sounding guitar. Anyone who chooses to follow the "Norlins are crap" dictum without using his own ears does so at his own peril.

Bob
__________________
"It is said, 'Go not to the elves for counsel for they will say both no and yes.' "
Frodo Baggins to Gildor Inglorion, The Fellowship of the Ring

THE MUSICIAN'S ROOM (my website)
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-03-2013, 04:24 PM
SalFromChatham's Avatar
SalFromChatham SalFromChatham is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 7,783
Default

I didnt buy it... I just enjoyed it in the shop for half an hour.
__________________
i got tired of updating my guitars.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 11-03-2013, 05:39 PM
Steve DeRosa Steve DeRosa is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Staten Island, NY - for now
Posts: 15,044
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by zombywoof View Post
...The thing about Norlin Gibsons is according to the common wisdom they generally sucked but a few gems managed to sneak out of Kalamazoo. But it seems that everybody who buys one manages to find one of those elusive gems. I am sorry but the vast majority of those I have gotten my hands on (and I am old enough to have played them when they were brand spanking new) sounded like they were stuffed with old t-shirts.
Quote:
Originally Posted by brian a. View Post
I'm old enough to agree. Maybe only the "good" ones have survived all these years, while the "bad" ones got beat up, broken, smashed or burned on stage or for videos...
I'm also old enough to have played them when they were new, and I agree that the vast majority of them stunk then and they stink now. I also had the good fortune to own one of those diamonds-in-the-rough back in the day - an "IMPERFECT-BGN" B45-12 "Lightfoot" that, according to standard Gibson practice of the day, should have been sold to an employee for next to nothing but instead found its way to the Brooklyn Sam Ash store in early '75; picked it up for $180 brand-new (about half the going price of a first-quality one), paid Matt Umanov $30 to reglue the bridge, and had a killer 12-string (similar mids/highs but more low-end than Gord's) for the next eight years (traded it on a first-run '52 Tele reissue in '83 when I went electric for a few years). I'm thinking that the ones that didn't fare so well tonally at the time found their way into their owners' basements/attics (unless you worked them over with a jackhammer they were virtually impossible to destroy) for the next 40 years - most of the ones that have started re-emerging lately seem to show few signs of use then or now - so if you're into the idea of owning a "near-mint" vintage piece and you're fortunate enough to get one that sounds decent (don't forget that the wood does in fact have four decades of aging to its credit), there are indeed some bargains to be had as the OP suggests. Nevertheless, caveat emptor...
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 11-03-2013, 05:41 PM
Fred Fred is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,840
Default

I agree that not ALL Norlin acoustics were turkeys. My sister had a late 60s, plain-Jane J-45...total canon. Very sweet guitar. Could hold its own with anything. She couldn't afford a Martin D-18 and the Gibson was the fall-back. It certainly was the match of any D-18 of the same period.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 11-03-2013, 05:57 PM
otis66 otis66 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 966
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by themissal View Post
I didnt buy it... I just enjoyed it in the shop for half an hour.
The Gibson AJ sounded great too. Too bad it had a huge crack in the top. You may not be able to reset the neck on a Norlin Gibson from this time period.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 11-03-2013, 06:03 PM
zabdart zabdart is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 9,306
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Doubleneck View Post
Have a Norlin 1975 Les Paul Custom. Great guitar. Good thing myths do is make some good guitars cheap.
Yep, it's true. I have a Les Paul Deluxe from the same period and despite being fairly beat-up when I got it, it's still a stellar guitar. However, it was a lot harder to screw up a solid-body design than an acoustic. It wasn't just the heavy, double-X bracing that made so many Norlin-era flattops dull-sounding but that huge, diamond-shaped bridge pad between the X's that really killed the sound. However, I will concede that there are a few Norlin-era Gibsons that are pretty good. As the OP suggested, however, most of these guitars need a neck reset by now (the product of setting the neck at a shallower angle). One of the great things about pre-Norlin Gibsons is that the neck sets were so great, they held up for decades. I have a '67 J-50 and it hasn't needed a neck reset yet. Norlin-era necks needed to be reset after about 20 years.
So, the prejudice against Norlin-era Gibsons is well founded. There were just any number of areas where problems could (and usually did) pop up. Compared to the pre-Norlin period, the flattops especially just weren't as good.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 11-03-2013, 06:11 PM
drive-south drive-south is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 4,628
Default

That era was strange but some great guitars still slipped out of Kalamazoo. Some of the finest carvetops that Gibson ever built were from that era such as the Citation, Johnny Smith, Barney Kessel, Howard Roberts, Byrdland, and L5S. Gibson had a very active custom shop during that era and most of the carvetops were built there. Gibson management didn't interfere much with the custom shop. None of the custom shop guitars had the dreaded volute.
__________________
"Vintage taste, reissue budget"
Reply With Quote
Reply

  The Acoustic Guitar Forum > General Acoustic Guitar and Amplification Discussion > General Acoustic Guitar Discussion






All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:19 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, The Acoustic Guitar Forum
vB Ad Management by =RedTyger=