The Acoustic Guitar Forum

Go Back   The Acoustic Guitar Forum > General Acoustic Guitar and Amplification Discussion > General Acoustic Guitar Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 07-20-2015, 04:29 AM
guit3090 guit3090 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 1,580
Lightbulb Recording King vs Blueridge guitars

Which company do you like best if either? I have always liked Blueridge best.
However, I was listening to someone play a Recording King, one of their solid models and I really like it. Heard they just finished a new plant too.
__________________
Recording King Parlor guitar- Cherry Sunburst

Snark Tuner
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-20-2015, 05:07 AM
Gibson4NJ Gibson4NJ is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: New Jersey, USA
Posts: 84
Default

I have had trouble liking the Recording Kings that I've played, while most Blueridge models have made a positive impression. Maybe they have more of a personality of their own vs. being 'almost there' copies?

Then Sigma/Kindred came along and made me forget about the other two immediately.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-20-2015, 05:12 AM
chitz chitz is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 6,405
Default

Blueridge hands down.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-20-2015, 05:17 AM
wvblues wvblues is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: West Virginia
Posts: 314
Default

Never owned a recording king but have several blueridges.
Good guitars but they have a pretty thick poly finish . It kind of stinks to use such good tonewoods and then bury it underneath a thick finish.

They still sound good, but I have always had the "what if" syndrome when it comes to them. Especially with those adi topped guitars.

I think recording king has some good parlor guitars. Eric Schoenberg teamed up with them a few years back. Worth a play. I'm wanting to try one of their torrefied adi models
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-20-2015, 09:47 AM
Arthur Blake Arthur Blake is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 1,025
Default Blueridge finish thickness

Quote:
Originally Posted by wvblues View Post
Never owned a recording king but have several blueridges.
Good guitars but they have a pretty thick poly finish . It kind of stinks to use such good tonewoods and then bury it underneath a thick finish.
This is a BR-243A manufactured in late 2012. The finish was applied thinly enough that the grain lines show through.



From most angles it looks glassy smooth, but with the reflection turned just one way, ridging in the finish is visible.

This guitar has always been properly humidified.
__________________
Martin OM-18 Authentic 1933 VTS (2016)
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-20-2015, 10:20 AM
merlin666 merlin666 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Canada Prairies
Posts: 2,957
Default

Isn't Eastman from the same set of factories too?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-20-2015, 10:31 AM
dmcowles@comcas dmcowles@comcas is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Arcadia, FL, USA
Posts: 698
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by merlin666 View Post
Isn't Eastman from the same set of factories too?

No, Eastman has been manufacturing stringed instruments in their own factory in Beijing for around 50 years. They made a name for themselves making bowed instruments (violin family) then moved into archtop guitars. After Blueridge guitars changed the game re. import flattop guitars, Eastman got on board and (IMHO) left the others like
Blueridge and RK in their dust.

Guild's GAD models are made in the same factory (Grand Reward) as Blueridge.

Dave Cowles, Admin
The Unofficial Blueridge Guitar Forum
__________________
I've cut this thing twice and it's still too short.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-20-2015, 10:58 AM
8bit 8bit is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 53
Default

RKs are solid but none of the ones I've played have ever really stood out to me. I'm a big fan of Blueridge despite not owning one (but I will fix that someday).

I still kick myself for passing up a really great one a few years back. I was just messing around in the used room at the Nashville Guitar Center playing around with a bunch of high end stuff I couldn't afford at the time. Picked up this Blueridge 160 and I kid you not it held it's own with every single Martin and Gibson in that room (to my ears anyway, YMMV). It was one of those times when you and a guitar just "click". Despite being one of the cheaper items in the room I still just didn't have the spare funds at that time so I had to walk away. Sigh.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-20-2015, 12:20 PM
Rosewood99 Rosewood99 is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Hilton Head
Posts: 14,832
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chitz View Post
Blueridge hands down.
Funny because my experience has been RK hands down
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-20-2015, 12:23 PM
Phelonious Ponk Phelonious Ponk is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 1,087
Default

The correct answer is Eastman.

P
__________________
One amazing '03 OJ
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 07-20-2015, 12:27 PM
jpd jpd is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: California
Posts: 11,290
Default The correct answer is Eastman.

ymmv....
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 07-20-2015, 12:37 PM
KasperT KasperT is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 220
Default

I've got parlors from both companies and both are nice. RK aims higher but Blueridge makes a quality and sturdy guitar, sturdier than my RK. Strokes for folks.
__________________
1987 Alvarez Yairi DY-39
2010 Bedell MB-28-G
2010 Bedell MB-18-G
2014 Recording King RP1-626-C
Blueridge BR-341
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 07-20-2015, 01:19 PM
ronbo ronbo is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Denver, Colorado
Posts: 600
Default

I've played quite a number of Blueridge guitars over the years and find them to be well-made, solid, good sounding and playing guitars. I've never taken one home, because they've never really spoken to me. They're kind of like Taylors for me, they look good and sound good and seem very consistent, but don't inspire me to play them. I've owned 4 Recording King guitars (currently own 2) because I prefer the neck profile and the tone speaks volumes to me. I think the Blueridge's had better fit and finish, seems like their QC is a bit better, but the tone and playability of RK's just fits me better and when I play and hear them, I am inspired to play them more! You may have to play a few RK's to find an exceptional one, but when you do, they are quite special.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 07-21-2015, 06:37 AM
jasbart jasbart is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 18
Default

For a couple years I played Blueridge guitars every chance I got. Was consistently blown away by the sound and quality control. But the bling factor was out of control. There was no way I could see myself playing an instrument with that much curly-cue mother of plastic crawling all over it.

Then, online, I happened upon a used BR-163 with a nicely cut "rosewood" plate that covered the headstock perfectly. I bought it without hesitation because of my favorable experience playing Blueridge guitars in stores. And no bling. I love that guitar.

Jim
__________________
1974 Martin 00-18, 2013 Blueridge BR-163, 1970 Martin D-35, 1970 Martin D-12-35, 1967 Gibson B-25, 2005 Larrivee L-05, 2013 Loar 216, 1993 Gibson Gospel, 1974 Martin 00-18
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 07-21-2015, 11:01 AM
leonski leonski is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 181
Default

message erased.

Last edited by leonski; 07-21-2015 at 12:34 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply

  The Acoustic Guitar Forum > General Acoustic Guitar and Amplification Discussion > General Acoustic Guitar Discussion






All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:51 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, The Acoustic Guitar Forum
vB Ad Management by =RedTyger=