#1
|
||||
|
||||
Do woods matter as much with electric guitars?
If they do, do they have the same effect on the overall sound of an instrument? For instance, with acoustics we associate maple with a bright focused sound. Rosewood darker, Koa sorta Mahogany-like. Is it the same with electrics?
EDIT: Meant to post this over on the electric forum; sorry, mods! Feel free to move. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Yes it does matter. Some examples: The Les Paul has a mahogany body and maple cap that give it a fat sort of sound and long sustain with a small dynamic difference between the attack and the sustain. You can pair those with humbuckers or P-90s and the basic full sound of the two-piece body is still there.
The all-mahogany Junior/Special is quite a bit thinner with either P-90s or 'buckers. All-maple guitars are bright and pingy with either humbuckers or single-coil pickups. It goes down even further in materials to the fingerboards - an alder Strat with a maple board has quite a different sound from an ash Strat with a rosewood board. Then there are the semi-hollow guitars: The ES-335 with a laminated body and maple center block sounds bolder than the more mellow ES-135 with the lam body and mahogany center block and different from the even more mellow ES-137 with lam and chromyte (balsa) center block. I hope that helps! Bob
__________________
"It is said, 'Go not to the elves for counsel for they will say both no and yes.' " Frodo Baggins to Gildor Inglorion, The Fellowship of the Ring THE MUSICIAN'S ROOM (my website) |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
The impact of wood type is hugely overrated -- and even more so with electrics.
Of course, rosewood versus maple for acoustics is kind of obvious -- but most of the conversations found on forums is much closer to the pedantic side of things. Wood choice is nothing compared to technique, attack -- and in the case of electrics, pick-ups, amps, effects, etc. Any sales guy or luthier who tries to convince me otherwise will lose a sale pronto. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
Thanks, Bob - quite helpful!
Mau, My experiences are pretty similar, I guess. A great luthier and/or player can defy all preconceived notions of what a tonewood "should" sound like. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Woods don't matter as much for electric guitars as they do for acoustic guitars.
For electric guitars, the body/neck materials are important but not as important as they are for acoustic guitars. Ampeg made a amazing acrylic/clear plastic body guitar, Travis Bean's steel body guitar. Electric Guitar Company make amazing guitars pretty much without a sight of any wood. For electric tone, pickups are very important, then as obvious as it might sound, the amp is very important. The material used to construct the electric guitar will have impact on tone but not as much impact as amp/pickups. The size/shape of the body of a electric is very important eg if it's semi hollow/hollow/solid for tone. But a solid body guitar be it a Telecaster whether the body is made from maple/mahogany/alder/ash won't make as impact on tone as a P90/Single Coil/Humbucker or whether it goes through a High Gain distortion Mesa Boogie or a clean Jazz Chorus amp. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Luthiers and store owners have all the reasons in the world to sell wood upgrades and to associate those upgrades with "better tone".
I mean no disrespect to anyone -- but I firmly assess that the people who really buy into those arguments are those who spend more time thinking about guitars than playing them. If they spent more time playing, they would realize that 99% of what's being said on forums is complete mud. |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
Unless, of course, they're talking about a Taylor. I've never seen anyone accuse a Taylor of being muddy.
__________________
Martin 0-16NY Emerald Amicus Emerald X20 Cordoba Stage Some of my tunes: https://youtube.com/user/eatswodo |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
__________________
Martin 0-16NY Emerald Amicus Emerald X20 Cordoba Stage Some of my tunes: https://youtube.com/user/eatswodo |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Trouble is, as always, that there is so rarely a *single* difference between two otherwise similar instruments to attribute a difference to.
__________________
Martin 0-16NY Emerald Amicus Emerald X20 Cordoba Stage Some of my tunes: https://youtube.com/user/eatswodo |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
From the Custom Shop: Quote:
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
I think wood differences, for solid body electrics, makes minimal differences. If we did a blind test between say two strats, one with a swamp ash body and one with an alder body both using the same pickups and same fretboard wood into the same amp 90%+ of listeners would not be able to tell the difference.
Using Dru's example of an Alder body Les Paul with a maple neck. If the alder body had a maple cap like most mahogany Les Pauls the maple fretboard would impart a tad of added top end, but would still be difficult to discriminate from a standard Les Paul as long as it was still a set-neck guitar. The species of wood would be more consequential for a hollow body or semi- hollow where there is more resonance from the wood. The biggest differences in electric guitars comes from how the neck is attached, the pickups and the amp. Last edited by terrapin; 07-24-2013 at 07:34 PM. |
#14
|
||||
|
||||
I don't think wood matters much on electric guitars. Just my opinion based on the electrics I've owned. I worry more about the amp and the pickups.
__________________
Circa OM-30/34 (Adi/Mad) | 000-12 (Ger/Maple) | OM-28 (Adi/Brz) | OM-18/21 (Adi/Hog) | OM-42 (Adi/Braz) Fairbanks SJ (Adi/Hog) | Schoenberg/Klepper 000-12c (Adi/Hog) | LeGeyt CLM (Swiss/Amzn) | LeGeyt CLM (Carp/Koa) Brondel A-2 (Carp/Mad) |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Jim |