The Acoustic Guitar Forum

Go Back   The Acoustic Guitar Forum > General Acoustic Guitar and Amplification Discussion > General Acoustic Guitar Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #16  
Old 01-18-2017, 01:22 PM
Kitkatjoe Kitkatjoe is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 819
Default

Banjoscotty do you really want us to make your decision for you?


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 01-19-2017, 01:19 AM
Cas-v86 Cas-v86 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 111
Default

Blueridge. Better tone, quality, finish.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 01-19-2017, 07:14 AM
countryblues75 countryblues75 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 92
Default

I would get the Blueridge, because I like the warmer, traditional sound they have.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 01-19-2017, 08:00 AM
Chrstian9090 Chrstian9090 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 28
Default

Of course you should pick what you like best, but if you've ever browsed how-to guitar repair videos on YouTube, you might have noticed how many times the guitar being worked on is a Blueridge.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 01-19-2017, 08:14 AM
roylor4 roylor4 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: McLeansville, NC
Posts: 7,449
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BoneDigger View Post
I am a fan of Blueridge and I've never found a Yamaha with the tone I like, so I vote for Blueridge. But, you should play both and pick what's best for YOU.

Todd

Sent from my LG-US996 using Tapatalk
I too, prefer the Blueridge tone. I prefer the Yamaha neck though.

Feel is just as important as tone, perhaps more so for some of us. Blueridges have thinner neck profiles and are gloss. I prefer satin necks with a thicker profile. YMMV
__________________
Roy


Ibanez, Recording King, Gretsch, Martin
G&L, Squier, Orange (x 2),
Bugera, JBL, Soundcraft

Our duo website - UPDATED 7/26/19
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 01-19-2017, 09:28 AM
cary cary is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Northern California
Posts: 870
Default

Blueridge makes some very nice guitars.

It comes down to the individual instrument of course, but my fiddle player has a Blueridge BR-163 that I actually like better than my Martin 000-18GE.

Go figure :/
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 01-19-2017, 01:04 PM
alien alien is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Central Ohio
Posts: 428
Default

Blueridge BR-43


Select, Solid Sitka Spruce top with hand-carved parabolic braces in the authentic Pre-war forward X-pattern
Mahogany back and sides
Carved Mahogany, low profile neck with, dove-tail neck joint
Natural high-gloss finish
"000" body size with a 14th-fret body joint
Black Multi-ply body binding (B/W/B/W/B)
M-O-P dot position markers
East Indian Rosewood fingerboard and bridge
Maple bridge plate
Ornate M-O-P peghead inlay
Bone nut and saddle
Black pickguard
Accurate vintage-style 14:1 ratio nickel-plated open-back tuners with butterbean-style buttons
Nut width: 1 11/16"
Scale length: 25.6" (650mm)
Lifetime Warranty

Yamaha LS6 Mahognay

Manufacturer Yamaha
Condition New
Body Style/Shape Small Body
String Material Steel
Number of Strings 6-Strings
Right/Left Handed Right
Top Solid Engelmann Spruce A.R.E.
Back Mahogany
Sides Mahogany
Neck Mahogany & Rosewood 5ply
Fretboard Rosewood
Bridge Rosewood
Cutaway No
Electronics SRT Zero Impact Pickup
Tuner Built In No
Scale Length 25-9/16" (650 mm)
Nut Width 1-3/4" (44 mm)
Finish Urethan
Hardware Die-cast Gold (TM-29G)
Case Included No


The hi-lited areas are where they differ, at least according to published specs. Both guitars are nice, though I personally like the looks of the Yamaha better. Also I prefer a 1 3/4" nut. I have not played either guitar, but have played a Blueridge. They have good tone, but a skinny neck IMO. If you desire a pick up the Yamaha has one. These are all things that you will need to work out on your own. Try to play them if possible.

My only true advice is...If you decide on the Blueridge, Give Maury's Music a call. He is great to work with and also a sponsor on this forum. He will give you the best deal possible.

Good luck!
__________________
Margaret


Martin: D-28, 00-18V, Custom 000-21, D12-35
Guild: GF-60M
Martin C1K ukulele, Kala soprano ukulele
Kentucky mandolin

Last edited by alien; 01-19-2017 at 01:27 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 01-19-2017, 05:22 PM
AgentKooper AgentKooper is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 958
Default

If you can add another $150 to the budget and swing the all-solid BR-143, that would be my recommendation. I've owned a Yamaha (an FG-700s), and thought it was okay, but I replaced it with a Blueridge that is superior in all respects. I don't have experience with the LS6 though.

I know I'm going afield from your question. But I've found marked improvement in quality (both build and sound) just making that last jump into the $500-$600 all-solid range. If you keep your eye open for deals, you can find even better prices, and you'd have a wider range of good brands to check out - Eastman, Alvarez, Guild, Recording King, Seagull, etc., in addition to the ones you asked about.

I don't think you can really go wrong between the two you're considering, though, if you're set on those two.
__________________
Martin CS-00-18 (2015)
Martin OM-28V (2011)
Northfield Model M mandolin
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 01-19-2017, 06:29 PM
Foster99 Foster99 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 7
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cas-v86 View Post
Blueridge. Better tone, quality, finish.

Tone....subjectively maybe.

Quality and finish...hardly.

Last edited by Kerbie; 01-19-2017 at 06:53 PM. Reason: Rule #1
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 01-19-2017, 06:37 PM
rlb9682 rlb9682 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Texas
Posts: 550
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sublro View Post
both excellent. have owned both. blueridge will have much thinner neck, more traditional tone.
I agree, the Blueridge has a much thinner neck and traditional tone. The Yamaha has a nice tone all it's own and if you haven't, play both of them to see which one you like best. But for me, the Blueridge is much better for the slimmer neck and more traditional tone.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 01-19-2017, 09:17 PM
Rmz76 Rmz76 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 3,946
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ADG View Post
Major neck difference. Yamaha's have C-shaped matte finish necks and, to me, are very playable. Blue ridge is a thicker D-shaped gloss neck. To me the gloss finish interferes with smoothly sliding the hand along the neck. Only you can decide which works best for you.

I've owned 2 Yamaha's (FG730S and LL16). And I think their builds are great in all the ways that matter (frets/ necks etc, sound boards etc) as well as finish details. They are bright guitars that tend to deliver a more balanced tone as you head up the product line. I agree with the earlier comments about traditional tone from BR but I was not overly impressed with the BR instruments that I have inspected.
Are you sure the neck width on the Yamaha is smaller? The Blueridge super thin D shape is so small I have at times wondered if it's structurally sound. It is defeinately thinner than the Yamaha FG700S and newer FG800. Not sure about the specific model the OP has in mind.

You're right about the high gloss finish on the back of the neck. I guess they think it gives it a more vintage look and feel. It's annoying but nothing a little #0000 Steel Wool can't take care of.

See
http://www.premierguitar.com/article...-neck-syndrome
__________________
Wayne


J-45 song of the day archive
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?lis..._Zmxz51NAwG1UJ

My music
https://soundcloud.com/waynedeats76
https://www.facebook.com/waynedeatsmusic

My guitars
Gibson, Martin, Blueridge, Alvarez, Takamine
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 01-20-2017, 12:19 AM
AgentKooper AgentKooper is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 958
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Foster99 View Post
Tone....subjectively maybe.

Quality and finish...hardly.
My only experience with Yamahas are the FG and FS 700 series. Perhaps the LS6 is a big step up from those. But the Blueridges in my signature, in terms of fit and finish, are -- objectively -- far superior in every way to the Yamahas I've owned and played.
__________________
Martin CS-00-18 (2015)
Martin OM-28V (2011)
Northfield Model M mandolin
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 01-20-2017, 01:35 AM
Cas-v86 Cas-v86 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 111
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AgentKooper View Post
My only experience with Yamahas are the FG and FS 700 series. Perhaps the LS6 is a big step up from those. But the Blueridges in my signature, in terms of fit and finish, are -- objectively -- far superior in every way to the Yamahas I've owned and played.
I agree. I do like the overall looks of Yamaha dreads though. Frankly, my Blueridge BR60 is the only Blueridge with the clean looks I like.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 01-20-2017, 07:03 AM
rokdog49 rokdog49 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 13,543
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AgentKooper View Post
If you can add another $150 to the budget and swing the all-solid BR-143, that would be my recommendation. I've owned a Yamaha (an FG-700s), and thought it was okay, but I replaced it with a Blueridge that is superior in all respects. I don't have experience with the LS6 though.

I know I'm going afield from your question. But I've found marked improvement in quality (both build and sound) just making that last jump into the $500-$600 all-solid range. If you keep your eye open for deals, you can find even better prices, and you'd have a wider range of good brands to check out - Eastman, Alvarez, Guild, Recording King, Seagull, etc., in addition to the ones you asked about.

I don't think you can really go wrong between the two you're considering, though, if you're set on those two.
I played a 143 and a 143A at Maury's live and in person and I loved them both. I have zero experience with Yamaha so I can't compare, but I like the sound of the Blueridge stuff. As far as the necks go, I find them easy to play and very comfortable. I've read on here some say they are too thin or narrow or whatever. That's totally subjective and I advise to take that with a grain of salt. In your price point, I would buy one of these:

https://www.laguitarsales.com/index....-11155837.html

The actual price is what Ted would quote you over the phone. No pickup, just a darn good guitar.
__________________
Nothing bothers me unless I let it.

Martin D18
Gibson J45
Gibson J15
Fender Copperburst Telecaster
Squier CV 50 Stratocaster
Squier CV 50 Telecaster
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 01-20-2017, 07:41 AM
sublro sublro is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Cape Cod MA
Posts: 806
Default

clarifying re neck profile. I was pretty into Blueridge for a long while and have owned probably 15 over the past ten years. the ones with 1 3/4 are their adirondack series (anything with an A at the end) the br-43 will be 1 11/16 and Blueridge's interpretation of a 1 11/16 neck is very slim. same on br-143 which is all solid and slightly nicer hunk of spruce. though there's NOTHING wrong with the tone on the 43...
Reply With Quote
Reply

  The Acoustic Guitar Forum > General Acoustic Guitar and Amplification Discussion > General Acoustic Guitar Discussion






All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:09 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, The Acoustic Guitar Forum
vB Ad Management by =RedTyger=