The Acoustic Guitar Forum

Go Back   The Acoustic Guitar Forum > General Acoustic Guitar and Amplification Discussion > Acoustic Amplification

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 10-25-2004, 07:36 PM
coolkev16 coolkev16 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: New Hyde Park, NY
Posts: 54
Default 80/20 vs phosphor bronze

What are the real tonal differences between the two? Which one is brighter? Which one sustains longer?

Some insight is greatly appreciated.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-27-2004, 07:56 AM
jimklein jimklein is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Minnesota USA
Posts: 1,109
Default

This is certainly a "Your mileage may vary" answer...

80/20's are a bit brighter
Phosphor is a bit warmer

Other factors:
Longevity of the strings
Sticky-ness of the strings
Your prefrences
__________________
Eastman Jumbo, Eastman 710, Yamaha SLG100S, BlueRidge BR-183, & Seagul SA6.

The best things in life, are not Things...
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-28-2004, 07:06 AM
12stringhack 12stringhack is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 55
Default

Jim's right. I'm evaluating strings on a new 354CE and PB were too warm and "dull sounding". The first sets of 80/20s were significantly brighter and crisper.

Your mileage may vary. Wood is organic (duh!) and strings you wouldn't usually consider may surprise you.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-28-2004, 11:13 AM
cpmusic's Avatar
cpmusic cpmusic is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Behind the Orange Curtain
Posts: 10,967
Default

This is one of those things that seems to vary from person to person, with some people saying 80/20 is brighter, and others saying PB is brighter.

I'm in the former camp, adding that phosphor bronze sounds more complex and three-dimensional than 80/20. The difference was really driven home when I put a set of Elixirs (which are 80/20) on my 000-15 because I was out of PBs. With the Elixirs, it sounded brighter and kind of harsh compared to where it had been. When I switched it back to phosphor bronze, it was warm and woody once again.

In the "old days" when Elixir wasn't around, Taylor's "factory string" was D'Addario phosphor bronze, and while I understand their reasons for switching to Elixirs, I think they'd do well to reconsider, because all three of my Taylors sound better with phosphor bronze strings.
__________________
Chris
We all do better when we all do better.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-28-2004, 10:55 PM
marklyn marklyn is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: San Diego County
Posts: 732
Default

80/20's are crunchier and PB have a smoother taste.

I think some of it also depends on the guitar. I have a Yamaha that sounds better with 80/20's. My Taylor, to me, has a much richer and more complex tone with the phosphor bronze strings. (John Pearse) The Elixirs sounded anemic by comparison.

Fortunately buying a bunch of different strings is a pretty cheap way to see how they sound on your particular guitar.
__________________
Marklyn
710 LTD 2002

http://www.marklyn.info/
Reply With Quote
Reply

  The Acoustic Guitar Forum > General Acoustic Guitar and Amplification Discussion > Acoustic Amplification






All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:22 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, The Acoustic Guitar Forum
vB Ad Management by =RedTyger=