The Acoustic Guitar Forum

Go Back   The Acoustic Guitar Forum > Other Discussions > Open Mic

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 08-16-2014, 07:11 PM
LouieAtienza LouieAtienza is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 4,617
Default Old computer technologies that lasted a LONG time

I remember way back when as a little kid, playing with the old DOSSHELL. It's funny that to this day, almost 40 years later, I still use CTRL-C, CTRL-V to copy and paste, ALT-F-X to close a program, ALT-TAB to switch between programs or windows. In fact for my CAD and CAM programs I use keyboard shortcuts whenever possible. It's also amazing how many of the commands available at the command prompt still exist.

I also remember in the late 90s or early 2000s, when I built a computer for my brother, using that old PC-AT case. I bought one of the first AMD Athlon boards in AT format, and the screw holes still lined up with that old PC case, and the Molex connectors were still the same. It's also amazing how long IDE cables and PCI slots lasted.

On my home CNC and home computer, I still run WinXP SP3 and still think it's one of my favorite OSs from Microsoft. Win7 is pretty good too, but for XP to last as long as it did is pretty amazing to me. I have a copy of Windows 1 at home, somewhere...
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-16-2014, 08:45 PM
sachi sachi is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: North Seattle
Posts: 3,189
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LouieAtienza View Post
I have a copy of Windows 1 at home, somewhere...
You have my sincere sympathy!
__________________
Sachi

Kolaya Carmen, Trek parlor (by Harv L), Martin 000-28EC, Taylor GC-5 and 355.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-16-2014, 08:58 PM
Xtremca Xtremca is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Iowa
Posts: 1,259
Default

I watched on an episode of 60 minutes that's our nations intercontinental ballistic missle defence system is operating on 8" floppy's. Talk about feeling secure in the old school tech.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-16-2014, 08:59 PM
Scootch Scootch is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Columbus, Oh!
Posts: 2,445
Default

I too have Windows 1 upstairs. It's on 5 1/4" floppies and has a coupon to send in for a copy on 3.5" disks.

I've often thought about mailing that in

FWIW, the first version of Windows was even worse the Millennial Edition. There was a bug in the print drivers.
__________________

~Dave
~Music self-played is happiness self-made
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-16-2014, 09:03 PM
fazool's Avatar
fazool fazool is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 16,627
Default

Yeah, I'm with you Louie. I am an old school user too. I prefer keyboard shortcuts and am very fast with them.

I still use a dosshell every now and then to do something - usually IPconfig stuff.

Other weirdness though are mostly the mechanics of it all.

DB15 VGA ports, RJ45 jacks, original USB form factor, micr USB (the power connector that doesn't), 1/8" headphone jacks, expansion cards (PCI/PCIE, etc.).


And my absolute favorite:

The car cigarette lighter which, itself, is a holdover of the cigar lighter (which is the reason for its size) and we have these monstrous adapters to charge our phones in a cigar socket.

Many have seen this:

Quote:
Say friend, did you know that the US Standard railroad gauge (distance between the rails) is 4 feet, 8 1/2 inches.

That's an exceedingly odd number. Why was that gauge used?

Because that's the way they built them in England, and the US railroads were built by English expatriates.

I see, but why did the English build them like that?

Because the first railway lines were built by the same people who built the pre-railroad tramways, and that's the gauge they used.

Well, why did they use that gauge in England?

Because the people who built the tramways used the same jigs and tools that they used for building wagons, which used that wheel spacing.

Okay! Why did their wagons use that odd wheel spacing?

Because, if they tried to use any other spacing the wagon wheels would break on some of the old, long distance roads. Because that's the spacing of the old wheel ruts.

So who built these old rutted roads?

The first long distance roads in Europe were built by Imperial Rome for the benefit of their legions. The Roman roads have been used ever since.

And the ruts?

The original ruts, which everyone else had to match for fear of destroying their wagons, were first made by the wheels of Roman war chariots. Since the chariots were made for or by Imperial Rome they were all alike in the matter of wheel spacing.

Thus, we have the answer to the original question. The United States standard railroad gauge of 4 feet, 8 1/2 inches derives from the original specification for an Imperial Roman army war chariot.

And the motto of the story is Specifications and bureaucracies live forever.

So, the next time you are handed a specification and wonder what horse's *** came up with it, you may be exactly right. Because the Imperial Roman chariots were made to be just wide enough to accommodate the back-ends of two war-horses.

So, just what does this have to do with the exploration of space?

Well, there's an interesting extension of the story about railroad gauge and horses' behinds. When we see a Space Shuttle sitting on the launch pad, there are two big booster rockets attached to the sides of the main fuel tank. These are the solid rocket boosters, or SRBs. The SRBs are made by Thiokol at a factory in Utah. The engineers who designed the SRBs might have preferred to make them a bit fatter, but the SRBs had to be shipped by train from the factory to the launch site.

The railroad from the factory runs through a tunnel in the mountains. The SRBs had to fit through that tunnel. The tunnel is slightly wider than a railroad track, and the railroad track is about as wide as two horses' behinds.

So a major design feature of what is arguably the world's most advanced transportation system was originally determined by the width of a horse's ***.
__________________
Fazool "The wand chooses the wizard, Mr. Potter"

Taylor GC7, GA3-12, SB2-C, SB2-Cp...... Ibanez AVC-11MHx , AC-240
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-16-2014, 09:20 PM
LouieAtienza LouieAtienza is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 4,617
Default

Well there is the rumor.that the Russians still use tubes in their space equipment.

Yes, it`s amazing mobos still have a standard phone jack (I suppose for fax capability) and VGA D sub connector. A lot of laptops still have them because most projectors have them.

The mechanical mouse lasted a long time. MIDI ports are still around, as well as RCA jacks on audio I/O boards. Even XLR is still around. And the 3-prong power connector, the same it was over 40 years ago. I heard newer computers do not have small speakers inside for POST beeps.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-16-2014, 11:36 PM
cpmusic's Avatar
cpmusic cpmusic is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Behind the Orange Curtain
Posts: 10,967
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LouieAtienza View Post
I remember way back when as a little kid, playing with the old DOSSHELL. It's funny that to this day, almost 40 years later, I still use CTRL-C, CTRL-V to copy and paste, ALT-F-X to close a program, ALT-TAB to switch between programs or windows. In fact for my CAD and CAM programs I use keyboard shortcuts whenever possible. It's also amazing how many of the commands available at the command prompt still exist.
I've been using computers daily since 1987, when I first got one at work. It was an AT-compatible machine running DOS-something, so there was no mouse, and I still prefer the keyboard for a lot of commands. Since my hands are already on the keys, it's just faster than moving to the mouse and back again. The latest version of MS Office doesn't respond quite as well to key commands as older versions, but copy, cut, paste, save, print, and others still work in Office, IE, and other Windows programs.
__________________
Chris
We all do better when we all do better.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-17-2014, 05:58 AM
Dru Edwards Dru Edwards is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 43,431
Default

I wonder if there's any nostalgic computer jocks who build computers on the side with vacuum tubes. I'm guessing no, unlike some people who build their own amps using tubes (which do provide a functional purpose, sweet overdriven tube tone).
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-17-2014, 06:13 AM
LouieAtienza LouieAtienza is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 4,617
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dru Edwards View Post
I wonder if there's any nostalgic computer jocks who build computers on the side with vacuum tubes. I'm guessing no, unlike some people who build their own amps using tubes (which do provide a functional purpose, sweet overdriven tube tone).
I read the Russians use them because they can function through a nuclear fallout. Though if there was nuclear fallout who would run the machines?

I remember one mobo company, ASUS or MSI, that had a tube preamp for their audio chip right on the mobo. Don`t think it caught on...
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-17-2014, 06:37 AM
clintj clintj is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Idaho Falls, ID
Posts: 4,269
Default

A good number of Russian military equipment still uses tubes because they're old, and also virtually immune to the electromagnetic pulse of nuclear weapons. My first ship had a tube based radio set as a backup as well. No one I talked to knew if it worked, though.

I grew up around the time of the Commodore 64 and Apple IIe computers, and still remember when floppies were actually floppy. Newer computers don't even have a drive for the 3.5" ones any more.
__________________
"You don't have to be great to start, but you have to start to be great." -Zig Ziglar

Acoustics
2013 Guild F30 Standard
2012 Yamaha LL16
2007 Seagull S12
1991 Yairi DY 50

Electrics
Epiphone Les Paul Standard
Fender Am. Standard Telecaster
Gibson ES-335
Gibson Firebird
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 08-17-2014, 08:06 AM
LouieAtienza LouieAtienza is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 4,617
Default

Yeah, the USB stick is the Floppy of today. I remember paying $250 for two 32MB SIMMs. Now you can get a 128GB USB stick for $60 or less!

Compared to my old PC-AT, expanded with 640k RAM, 10MB SCSI hard drive, and two 5-1/4" floppy drives!

I still use the parallel port for my CNC machine, though USB and Ethernet controllers are now popular.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 08-17-2014, 08:09 AM
robj144 robj144 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 10,431
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by clintj View Post
A good number of Russian military equipment still uses tubes because they're old, and also virtually immune to the electromagnetic pulse of nuclear weapons. My first ship had a tube based radio set as a backup as well. No one I talked to knew if it worked, though.

I grew up around the time of the Commodore 64 and Apple IIe computers, and still remember when floppies were actually floppy. Newer computers don't even have a drive for the 3.5" ones any more.
Why would tube based circuits be immune to EM pulses? Even if tubes were immune, the rest of the circuit would be fried.

I had a C64 too. I remember cassette tape drives before floppies. A 20 kb program would take 20 minutes to load.
__________________
Guild CO-2
Guild JF30-12
Guild D55
Goodall Grand Concert Cutaway Walnut/Italian Spruce
Santa Cruz Brazilian VJ
Taylor 8 String Baritone
Blueberry - Grand Concert
Magnum Opus J450
Eastman AJ815
Parker PA-24
Babicz Jumbo Identity
Walden G730
Silvercreek T170
Charvell 150 SC
Takimine G406s
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 08-17-2014, 08:12 AM
LouieAtienza LouieAtienza is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 4,617
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by robj144 View Post
Why would tube based circuits be immune to EM pulses? Even if tubes were immune, the rest of the circuit would be fried.

I had a C64 too. I remember cassette tape drives before floppies. A 20 kb program would take 20 minutes to load.
We had cassette drives at school, connected to a Commodore PET. By the time a program loaded, class was half done!

I had a Coleco ADAM, which also used a tape drive, which was high-speed. The tapes would stretch and corrupt everything on them. I had to constantly make backups.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 08-17-2014, 09:40 AM
Bob Womack's Avatar
Bob Womack Bob Womack is offline
Guitar Gourmet
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Between Clever and Stupid
Posts: 27,083
Default

How about old computer terminology? "Hacking" dates to before computer days. At Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute there was a student's special interest group that maintained an extremely large and complicated model railroad layout. A practice developed where a student would attempt to see how big a change in the rail layout he could make while others were in class. Changing the layout required cutting the rails with a hacksaw, thus "hacking" the layout. These same students were the ones who became interested in computer sciences when it first developed at the institute and carried the term into that department. We still use the term today.

How about "mounting and dismounting drives?" Back in the early computer days, mainframes were served by large, 10.5" open-reel data drives. The computer operator would literally and physically mount a reel onto the drive and thread up the tape and then logically "mount" it from the disk operating system, during which process the computer would play head of the tape, find the tape's ID and volume table of contents at the head of the reel, and prepare it to be accessed. The name carried on through the original hard disks through floppy discs to modern hard disks to virtual drives.

Bob
__________________
"It is said, 'Go not to the elves for counsel for they will say both no and yes.' "
Frodo Baggins to Gildor Inglorion, The Fellowship of the Ring

THE MUSICIAN'S ROOM (my website)
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 08-17-2014, 10:25 AM
clintj clintj is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Idaho Falls, ID
Posts: 4,269
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by robj144 View Post
Why would tube based circuits be immune to EM pulses? Even if tubes were immune, the rest of the circuit would be fried.

I had a C64 too. I remember cassette tape drives before floppies. A 20 kb program would take 20 minutes to load.
Vacuum tubes are far more tolerant of voltage spikes than IC devices, especially the miniaturized ones in computers. I never venture inside a PC without grounding myself to the chassis to prevent any static discharge from frying expensive things. You are right though; some observation aircraft for early nuke testing did suffer minor EMP damage but could still land safely.
__________________
"You don't have to be great to start, but you have to start to be great." -Zig Ziglar

Acoustics
2013 Guild F30 Standard
2012 Yamaha LL16
2007 Seagull S12
1991 Yairi DY 50

Electrics
Epiphone Les Paul Standard
Fender Am. Standard Telecaster
Gibson ES-335
Gibson Firebird
Reply With Quote
Reply

  The Acoustic Guitar Forum > Other Discussions > Open Mic






All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:46 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, The Acoustic Guitar Forum
vB Ad Management by =RedTyger=