#1
|
|||
|
|||
lesson for the day...
Low tension, light gauge strings do not really work that well on a 12 fret, short scale guitar. At least, not for me.
Last edited by Merlemantel; 07-30-2023 at 02:53 PM. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
By light gauge do you mean 12s? I’m trying to understand why these strings would sound worse on a 12 fret than a 14 fret of the same basic build characteristics other than where the neck meets the body. Is it maybe the type strings?
+
__________________
Gibson and Fender Electrics Boutique Tube Amps Martin, Gibson, and Larrivee Acoustics |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
The shorter scale means that already low tension strings are stretched to an even lower tension than would be the case for a longer scale, 14 fret instrument. For me, this makes the strings susceptible to buzzing, and twanging, for lack of better terms, when I pluck the string with some force. 11-50s, thomastik-infeld plectrums.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
I have two 12 frets, but only on is short scale.j
__________________
Eastman E6D-TC Martin 000-18 Republic RP-1 Un branded Chinese guitar with lotsa bling |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
yep, I should have clarified that. 12 fret, shorter scale instrument.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
+
__________________
Gibson and Fender Electrics Boutique Tube Amps Martin, Gibson, and Larrivee Acoustics |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
I suppose scale length would also have something to do with it. As well as the shape of the 12 fret (elongated body?) and bridge placement.
That said, it can be tough to predict what works on a particular guitar. YMMV |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
yep, that's the downside. Easier to fret, but a little loosey goosey
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
For Martin patern 12 fret designs the 000 would have what is regarded as "standard" scale (25.4" or similat) but 00 and 0 would have 24.9" scales.
Gibson and their patterns have a different, and variable approach mostly shorter. Essentially, under 25" scales are considered short scale. I tried some DR Rare, which (I believe - I asked but they didn't reply) are lower than normal tension. I wasn't aware of that when folks here told me to buy them. Frankly, I don't "get" the idea of low tension strings - surely, they move the top less efficiently than "normal" strings ?? I put a set of mediums on one of my dreads - took 'em off a few days later, went back to ej17s.
__________________
Silly Moustache, Just an old Limey acoustic guitarist, Dobrolist, mandolier and singer. I'm here to try to help and advise and I offer one to one lessons/meetings/mentoring via Zoom! Last edited by Silly Moustache; 07-30-2023 at 04:19 PM. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
I agree that it depends on the guitar and the player. I’m predominantly a singer songwriter and play a 12 fret long scale, a 12 fret short scale, a 14 fret long scale and a 14 fret short scale and use 12-54s most often and sometimes round core strings. Different brands have slightly different tensions. Light gauge, low tension strings generally work for me. If I was playing more nuanced instrumental pieces than I might find that I would pick different strings. It really is a subjective experience.
Best, Jayne |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Scale length and body shape do play a role, but dropping the pitch you're tuning to has a much bigger effect. And you also need to consider the way the top is braced, and the intention of the builder. You can use low tension strings on a lightly built guitar very nicely - but few manufactured guitars are built lightly enough to get the best out of them. Most players who opt for low tension strings are doing so for the ergonomics and ease of playing, rather than trying to maximize volume and response -
__________________
More than a few Santa Cruz’s, a few Sexauers, a Patterson, a Larrivee, a Cumpiano, and a Klepper!! |