#16
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
The Jubel is smoother, and I would say better balanced. It has the dry, thuddy Gibson sound, but it also has a lot of overtones. I think that it is a more versatile guitar, but as the J-45 ages, they probably will sound more similar. Both guitars have a very well developed bass, (which was surprising), and they both have endless headroom. I think that the Jubel sounds better fingerpicked as it doesn't need as much energy to drive the top. This is very much what it sounds like |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
I have a 92 AJ, would this be redundant?
Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk |
#18
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
The two guitars compliment each other nicely, in my opinion. A lot of people have an AJ as well as a J-45. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
I thought you had referenced a 53 J45. Is it a reproduction? I have played a 50s J45 recently and was hoping to get a clearer picture in my head of the sound of this guitar. Not a big deal just wondering.
Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk |
#20
|
||||
|
||||
Look on page one of this thread. That is where the comparison is.
|
#21
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Here are the before and after pictures. Last edited by Keith7940236; 03-06-2017 at 12:06 PM. |
#22
|
||||
|
||||
Monday Bump
|
#23
|
||||
|
||||
Guitar is sold
|