The Acoustic Guitar Forum

Go Back   The Acoustic Guitar Forum > General Acoustic Guitar and Amplification Discussion > Build and Repair

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 05-02-2015, 12:45 PM
viento viento is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: northern Germany (Dutch border) + south of Spain
Posts: 572
Default Truss rod access from where...?

Access to adjust the truss rod is possible from the soundhole or from the peg head.
What is to prefer? Pros and cons ?

I´m asking because I am building a 12-string and have to consider the truss rod.
__________________
Thanks!




Martin D28 (1973)
12-string cutaway ...finished ;-)
Hoyer 12-string (1965)
Yamaha FG-340 (1970)
Yamaha FG-512 (ca. 1980)
D.Maurer 8-string baritone (2013-2014)
and 4 electric axes
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-02-2015, 02:34 PM
Ned Milburn Ned Milburn is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Dartmouth, NS
Posts: 3,127
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by viento View Post
Access to adjust the truss rod is possible from the soundhole or from the peg head.
What is to prefer? Pros and cons ?

I´m asking because I am building a 12-string and have to consider the truss rod.
The main reason to avoid headstock adjusting truss rods is the loss of strength where the headstock and neck meet.
__________________
----

Ned Milburn
NSDCC Master Artisan
Dartmouth, Nova Scotia
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-02-2015, 04:37 PM
printer2 printer2 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Middle of Canada
Posts: 5,131
Default

Doing a small open headstock guitar right now. I am going the headstock route as I do not see having too much tension on the neck as it will be lightly strung and a shorter scale. I added a volute to make up for the material lost from the truss rod access. I would be a little more hesitant on doing the same for a 12 string as you have more strings resulting in more tension on the neck. Also the headstock will be longer which would give further mechanical advantage for any knock on the headstock to break it off.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-02-2015, 05:55 PM
viento viento is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: northern Germany (Dutch border) + south of Spain
Posts: 572
Default

I forgot to mention that this 12-string will be a 27" scale baritone.
So the access to the truss rod from the soundhole will be best, I guess.
__________________
Thanks!




Martin D28 (1973)
12-string cutaway ...finished ;-)
Hoyer 12-string (1965)
Yamaha FG-340 (1970)
Yamaha FG-512 (ca. 1980)
D.Maurer 8-string baritone (2013-2014)
and 4 electric axes
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-02-2015, 06:01 PM
Tom West Tom West is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 1,067
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ned Milburn View Post
The main reason to avoid headstock adjusting truss rods is the loss of strength where the headstock and neck meet.
Also I think a bare headplate looks cleaner and more elegant.
Tom
__________________
A person who has never made a mistake has never made anything
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-02-2015, 06:13 PM
redir redir is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Mountains of Virginia
Posts: 7,679
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom West View Post
Also I think a bare headplate looks cleaner and more elegant.
Tom
On the other hand a nicely crafted truss cover or, as I prefer to do it, a hole that flares out through the sandwich layers of the peg head overlay offer a sort of art deco functional design kind of look.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-03-2015, 07:47 AM
Tom West Tom West is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 1,067
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by redir View Post
On the other hand a nicely crafted truss cover or, as I prefer to do it, a hole that flares out through the sandwich layers of the peg head overlay offer a sort of art deco functional design kind of look.
As they say.............whatever floats your boat or turns your crank. Like so many other things with guitars, it can come down to personal preference. But Ned's point about being a weak area should not be overlooked.
Tom
__________________
A person who has never made a mistake has never made anything
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-03-2015, 07:59 AM
John Arnold John Arnold is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 4,091
Default

As a repairman who has repaired scores of broken headstocks over the last 30+ years, I have a strong preference for truss rods that adjust at the soundhole.
Quote:
I am going the headstock route as I do not see having too much tension on the neck as it will be lightly strung and a shorter scale.
Even with less string tension, I still prefer not to have the adjustment at the headstock. The primary cause of headstock breaks is a fall which impacts the neck in a 'whiplash', and string tension does contribute. But it also can happen with looser strings, such as during shipping. The other contributing factor is heavy tuners, the heaviest being Grover Rotomatics.
If you still are dedicated to headstock adjustment, my recommendation is an Allen type adjustment nut, rather than a hex nut. The hex nut requires a larger cutout to make room for a socket wrench.
It looks like Gibson, Guild and Taylor would have learned that by now......
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-03-2015, 07:59 AM
redir redir is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Mountains of Virginia
Posts: 7,679
Default

Yup it does weaken the area. Also it tends to get marred up from overzealous users too. Some builders put it through the soundhole in almost impossible places to reach for that very reason. I got one in now, a 12 fretter, and I don't have an 8in Allen key.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-03-2015, 08:54 AM
stanron stanron is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 2,428
Default

My personal preference is for head adjustment. In over 50 years of playing all my guitars adjusted at the head, and I've never had a break at that point. I wouldn't say I am particularly careful, luck perhaps?
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 05-03-2015, 09:02 AM
Ned Milburn Ned Milburn is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Dartmouth, NS
Posts: 3,127
Default

It must be remembered that steel string headstocks are much thinner than classical and flamenco headstocks, and yet they carry nearly double the tension.

A variety of means to strengthen steel string headstocks has been used, including back-laminates, volutes, combos...

Myself, since I both prefer headstock truss adjustments and think the steel string standard headstock is weak by design, I have created a headstock design that has a thicker spine than standard steel string, but with routed "plates" on the back side to enable the same size tuners (tuner post length is fairly standard, so the guitar headstock must be made to fit the available tuners).
__________________
----

Ned Milburn
NSDCC Master Artisan
Dartmouth, Nova Scotia
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 05-03-2015, 09:03 AM
printer2 printer2 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Middle of Canada
Posts: 5,131
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Arnold View Post
As a repairman who has repaired scores of broken headstocks over the last 30+ years, I have a strong preference for truss rods that adjust at the soundhole.

Even with less string tension, I still prefer not to have the adjustment at the headstock. The primary cause of headstock breaks is a fall which impacts the neck in a 'whiplash', and string tension does contribute. But it also can happen with looser strings, such as during shipping. The other contributing factor is heavy tuners, the heaviest being Grover Rotomatics.
If you still are dedicated to headstock adjustment, my recommendation is an Allen type adjustment nut, rather than a hex nut. The hex nut requires a larger cutout to make room for a socket wrench.
It looks like Gibson, Guild and Taylor would have learned that by now......
I have some lightweight mini open tuners and Allen key adjustable truss rod. Along with the volute I am guessing I can get away with it.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 05-03-2015, 10:50 AM
Ned Milburn Ned Milburn is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Dartmouth, NS
Posts: 3,127
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by printer2 View Post
I have some lightweight mini open tuners and Allen key adjustable truss rod. Along with the volute I am guessing I can get away with it.
Should be fine. Remember, while guitars with headstock cracks are common, guitars with zero headstock cracks are still far more common. For storage, transportation, and usage (user) and wood choice/construction (builder), it is important to identify weaknesses so as to give them the proper degree of care.
__________________
----

Ned Milburn
NSDCC Master Artisan
Dartmouth, Nova Scotia
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 05-04-2015, 03:56 PM
Rodger Knox Rodger Knox is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Baltimore, Md.
Posts: 2,431
Default

Are you making your own truss rod, or using one of the commercially available rods? With a 27" scale, you'll need a long enough rod to put the relief at the right place on the neck if you use soundhole adjustment.
The length won't be so critical with headstock adjustment.
__________________
Rodger Knox, PE
1917 Martin 0-28
1956 Gibson J-50
et al
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 06-28-2015, 04:33 PM
viento viento is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: northern Germany (Dutch border) + south of Spain
Posts: 572
Default

I have bought a 46cm / 18.110 inches truss rod with Allen key.
My only problem is that I have already closed the box and still have to make the tenon and mortise.
The fingerboard has not yet been glued on.
I have to drill the hole for the Allen key side into the body through the neck block plus the first brace.
Maybe I better make the truss rod a bit longer... Btw, the neck touches the body at the 15th fret.
I will get to this problem when I'm back home again after my holidays. Then I can also post some photos...
__________________
Thanks!




Martin D28 (1973)
12-string cutaway ...finished ;-)
Hoyer 12-string (1965)
Yamaha FG-340 (1970)
Yamaha FG-512 (ca. 1980)
D.Maurer 8-string baritone (2013-2014)
and 4 electric axes
Reply With Quote
Reply

  The Acoustic Guitar Forum > General Acoustic Guitar and Amplification Discussion > Build and Repair






All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:26 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, The Acoustic Guitar Forum
vB Ad Management by =RedTyger=