The Acoustic Guitar Forum

Go Back   The Acoustic Guitar Forum > General Acoustic Guitar and Amplification Discussion > General Acoustic Guitar Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #16  
Old 07-25-2014, 07:49 AM
Misty44 Misty44 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Cambridge, Massachusetts
Posts: 3,028
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kydave View Post
LOL! I've got one with that dang thing on it, too. Yes - that aspect of that guitar looks cheap and I'd love to change it someday!


I recently did change it on my HD-35. The gold foil just looked too gaudy and plastic-like for my "traditional" tastes.

Removed the foil and refinished sans any logo:




Removed the raccoon eyes too!
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 07-25-2014, 07:57 AM
kydave kydave is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: A Louisville transplant in Silicon Valley
Posts: 12,500
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by devellis View Post
The new Authentics have a sort of hybrid -- gold decal without outline. I presume it's a replica of what was used in the '30s but haven't checked.

Bingo! One choice, anyway.

1934 Sillk screen logo


1934 Decal


Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 07-25-2014, 08:00 AM
guitararmy guitararmy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: The Mountain State
Posts: 4,207
Default

If it's anything like the PRS gold foil signatures on the PRS headstocks, they may have a tendency to rub off with polishing....
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 07-25-2014, 08:07 AM
la palma C la palma C is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Hampton Roads, VA
Posts: 1,001
Default

I like the more "traditional" logo a bit better, but the gold foil one never offended me at all - and let me say - I HATE bling.

That said, the gold foil logo never looked like bling to me - in my eyes it is a classy and subtle appointment.

I have to say though, the decal on the Authentics might be the best looking one.
__________________
Looking for an excuse to "downsize", i.e. buy a new 00
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 07-25-2014, 08:11 AM
Misty44 Misty44 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Cambridge, Massachusetts
Posts: 3,028
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by guitararmy View Post
If it's anything like the PRS gold foil signatures on the PRS headstocks, they may have a tendency to rub off with polishing....

The Martin gold foils are under a coat of lacquer and are impervious to polishing. You can dig them out with an Exacto knife, but will leave a depression and raged edges where the lacquer has been broken.

One of the periods on my HD-35 above flaked off, which gave me the motivation to remove them all. Would have left the headstock like that with the depressions, but couldn't buff out the edges of the remaining lacquer.

So like Anne Boleyn's head, off they came.
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 07-25-2014, 08:22 AM
bobdcat bobdcat is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,004
Default

I prefer the stamp on the back of the headstock. I already know it's a Martin.



The front is clean:



The whole guitar - a Maury's Music custom 00-28VS

__________________
Roger

Several Martins, 2 Guilds, a couple of kits and a Tilton (ever heard of those?),
some ukes and a 1920s Vega tenor banjo


Neil deGrasse Tyson — 'The good thing about science is that it's true whether or not you believe in it.'
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 04-24-2017, 12:30 AM
Wade Hampton Wade Hampton is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Chugiak, Alaska
Posts: 31,230
Default

I have to say, this is something that I've lost ZERO sleep worrying about. I like all of the Martin logos equally. I would certainly never refinish a headstock in order to get rid of one I disliked.

About the only Martin logo I'm not entirely enthused about is the one on the Martin CEO-8:





Martin CEO-8

Even then, I'd probably replace the pickguard but leave the headstock logo alone. It's deliberately not a very Martin-like headstock or company logo, either one, but that's kind of the point....


whm
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 04-24-2017, 05:42 AM
chitz chitz is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 6,405
Default

I think the foil looks cheap on $2k + guitars. Okay on economy models.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 04-24-2017, 09:09 AM
ghostnote ghostnote is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 1,683
Default

I can honestly say I've never thought about it - I have 3 Martins and I'm not sure without looking which logos I have! I'll have to check that tonight when I get home.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 04-24-2017, 10:01 AM
drive-south drive-south is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 4,628
Default

The old decal was never a decal. It was silk screened.
__________________
"Vintage taste, reissue budget"
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 04-24-2017, 10:25 AM
llew llew is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Coastal South Carolina
Posts: 13,773
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Misty44 View Post
I recently did change it on my HD-35. The gold foil just looked too gaudy and plastic-like for my "traditional" tastes.

Removed the foil and refinished sans any logo:




Removed the raccoon eyes too!
Very nice!
__________________
Jim

Dogs Welcome......People Tolerated!
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 04-24-2017, 11:49 AM
brencat's Avatar
brencat brencat is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 7,668
Default

The only thing I dislike more than the raised foil logo is the vertical abalone CF Martin logos of the 40 series. I would much prefer they be abalone script.

For everything else, Large Old Style script, or Script Golden Era.
__________________
Merrill | Martin | Collings | Gibson

For Sale: 2023 Collings D2H 1 3/4 Nut, Adi Bracing, NTB -- $4100 shipped
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 04-24-2017, 01:51 PM
FLRon FLRon is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: SW Florida
Posts: 1,095
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wade Hampton View Post
I have to say, this is something that I've lost ZERO sleep worrying about. I like all of the Martin logos equally. I would certainly never refinish a headstock in order to get rid of one I disliked.

About the only Martin logo I'm not entirely enthused about is the one on the Martin CEO-8:





Martin CEO-8

Even then, I'd probably replace the pickguard but leave the headstock logo alone. It's deliberately not a very Martin-like headstock or company logo, either one, but that's kind of the point....


whm
Agree about the logo-plain ugly. But I LOVE that guitar,even if it is what it is😚
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 04-24-2017, 06:06 PM
bluetweed bluetweed is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 314
Default

Label I had put on my Custom CEO-7 (Golden Era Large Logo)
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 04-24-2017, 06:13 PM
HHP HHP is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 29,351
Default

Don't care much. Might have a preference for the black outline script. Only see it when the guitar is in the case anyway. If I ever order one, it will have the Torch inlay.
Reply With Quote
Reply

  The Acoustic Guitar Forum > General Acoustic Guitar and Amplification Discussion > General Acoustic Guitar Discussion






All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:45 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, The Acoustic Guitar Forum
vB Ad Management by =RedTyger=