The Acoustic Guitar Forum

Go Back   The Acoustic Guitar Forum > General Acoustic Guitar and Amplification Discussion > General Acoustic Guitar Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 01-12-2018, 07:04 PM
LewisBrookshire LewisBrookshire is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Dallas, GA
Posts: 613
Default Martin 000-17 Whiskey sunset vs 000-18

I am looking for some assitance. I am currently torn between these two guitars and I can’t find any locally to play. I am curious for those of you who have played the two to tell me which you prefer and why. I know its all subjective but looking for opinions. The 000-17 is brand new and the the 000-18 is a 2017. The 18 I am looking at has the 1 3/4” nut width so almost all things are equal between the two....and the price is the same.

Thanks in advance for the help!
__________________
"He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep to gain what he cannot lose."
- Jim Elliot
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-12-2018, 07:29 PM
dcmey dcmey is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 810
Default

If the price is the same, then I would go for the 18. I have played both and like both.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-12-2018, 08:03 PM
Tracy Perry Tracy Perry is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Texas
Posts: 57
Default

I've got an 00-17SE that I love (due to being a 12 fret) but overall, I MUCH prefer my 000-18 to it.
If both are new I'd go with the 000-18 personally.
My 000-18 was a new 2015 and I just look at it as it's gotten some aging to the wood over the 2017 that was also available at the time.
__________________
2015 Martin 000-18
2016 Martin OM-28
2017 Martin 00-17SE
2017 Gibson HP 415 W
2017 Ibanez AVN10
2016 Gibson Les Paul Standard T (Desert Burst)
2017 Fender FSR Standard Stratocaster 3 color Sunburst
2017 Fender Special Edition Deluxe Ash Telecaster
2017 Fender American Professional Telecaster
2017 Epiphone ES-339 P90 Pro
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-12-2018, 11:52 PM
Guest 728
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

The 17 has sweet and clear fundamentals. The 18 is a little richer and three-dimensional. The 17 sounds little boxier to my ears, but it has a nice woodiness to it. The 18 has more depth and resonance.

Last edited by Guest 728; 01-12-2018 at 11:58 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-13-2018, 01:45 AM
woodbox woodbox is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: West side of WA state
Posts: 2,323
Default I prefer the 18 over the 17

I'm in agreement with what everyone has said so far,
and I especially concur with Willie's observations...17 boxy, 18 resonate.

I would take the 18 without hesitation.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-13-2018, 02:13 AM
ManyMartinMan ManyMartinMan is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: In The Hills, Off Mulholland
Posts: 4,101
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Willie Voltaire View Post
The 17 has sweet and clear fundamentals. The 18 is a little richer and three-dimensional. The 17 sounds little boxier to my ears, but it has a nice woodiness to it. The 18 has more depth and resonance.
Pretty spot on in my opinion. My 000-18 plays like butter, sounds angelic and records beautifully.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-13-2018, 08:57 AM
drive-south drive-south is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 4,628
Default

00018 for me too. I dont care for the satin finish on the 17.
__________________
"Vintage taste, reissue budget"
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-13-2018, 09:10 AM
ataylor ataylor is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,354
Default

I’ve played both — I’d say the 000-17 was fun, while the 000-18 was fantastic.

I’d be happy to own and play either, but found the 000-18 to be a far more compelling and versatile guitar. The 000-17 is very much inspired by the Waterloo guitars, both in finish and tone. Which is to say that they’re really cool guitars with a thin non-gloss finish and more of a dry, direct, almost boxy tone. For several styles of play, it might be the better sound, but in almost every other aspect I think the 18 series is the best set of guitars Martin makes.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-13-2018, 09:11 AM
JAMKC JAMKC is online now
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 1,160
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Willie Voltaire View Post
The 17 has sweet and clear fundamentals. The 18 is a little richer and three-dimensional. The 17 sounds little boxier to my ears, but it has a nice woodiness to it. The 18 has more depth and resonance.


Perfect description Willy. The 000-17 is not boxy in a bad way at all, just different than the 000-18. Two nice options.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-13-2018, 09:14 AM
Kerbie Kerbie is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 28,635
Default

Two great choices. I also agree with Willie's assessment. I don't find the 17s boxy, but I understand how some could. I'd go with the 17, but I think most would choose the 18. Can't lose though.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 01-13-2018, 09:42 AM
TBman's Avatar
TBman TBman is offline
Get off my lawn kid
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 35,972
Default

Two completely different guitars. The Sunset is a nice vibe if you have a few other guitars and just use it for certain songs. The 18 is more versatile. The official AGF rulebook section says

4.(b).1.(c) When a member cannot decide between two properly identified guitars the member must buy both.

Lol
__________________
Barry

My SoundCloud page

Avalon L-320C, Guild D-120, Martin D-16GT, McIlroy A20, Pellerin SJ CW

Cordobas - C5, Fusion 12 Orchestra, C12, Stage Traditional

Alvarez AP66SB, Seagull Folk


Aria {Johann Logy}:
Reply With Quote
Reply

  The Acoustic Guitar Forum > General Acoustic Guitar and Amplification Discussion > General Acoustic Guitar Discussion






All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:01 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, The Acoustic Guitar Forum
vB Ad Management by =RedTyger=