#16
|
|||
|
|||
Body shape is huge for acoustic guitars near zero for electrics.
Mass may be a factor, ie how much wood there is regardless of the shape but only up to a point: the point at which there's enough wood to provide a solid, non-flexible mounting point for the bridge, tailpiece and also the neck. I suspect (without any scientific evidence to back me up) the most important wooden part of an electric guitar is the neck. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Does the shape of a guitar's body really matter all that much?
Not in the least... |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Not as crazy as the BC Rich Virgin ad...
I think if you go to certain extremes you'll get different "feel" for sure, which may affect the way you play. A string through can have a slightly different "tone" and "feel" from a vibrato bridge. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Good humor Steve DeRosa
|
#21
|
|||
|
|||
I have wondered this myself. Alder vs mahogany, basswood vs plywood. I think it does have an effect dwarfed by the pickups and amp. Its there but not detectable.
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
It IS detectable if you have trained or very sensitive ears -- but it's the pickups which have the primary impact on the sound of a solid-body electric; then comes the tonewood. The shape of the body has almost no impact at all.
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
I gotta find me $3 to send away for the poster. . I remember buying a new B.C. Rich Warlock back in '89. It was my main guitar for 10 years - I still have it.
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
I used to own a BC Rich double neck that was in a MTV video with House of Lords. Great guitar, but insanely heavy. |