The Acoustic Guitar Forum

Go Back   The Acoustic Guitar Forum > General Acoustic Guitar and Amplification Discussion > General Acoustic Guitar Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 08-16-2013, 09:48 PM
PTC Bernie PTC Bernie is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: PTC GA
Posts: 4,537
Default Guild D25 vs D40

First let me say that I do have a copy of Hans Moust's book and have consulted therewith.

I have a 76 D40 and a 78 D25. I'm thinning the herd and trying to decide which of these guitars to sell. They sound very similar so holding on to both seems a little self indulgent.

Both are spruce top and hog sides and back. Dimensions are almost identical, the D25 is slightly thinner, at least the sides, but it has the rounded back.


Where can I find more detailed info on the type of bracing and wood used on either guitar, or other info not available in the Bible according to Herr Moust?

Thanks to all in advance.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-16-2013, 10:19 PM
JohnW63 JohnW63 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 3,850
Default

Over at the Lets Talk Guild forum, where the author hangs out on occasion ? Nice folks over there too.
__________________
2010 Guild F47R
2009 G & L Tribute "Legacy"
1975 Ovation Legend
1986 Ovation 1758 12 String
2007 Walden G2070
2008 Guild D55 Prototype
1998 Guild Starfire IV
2016 Guild Newark St. X-175 Sunburst
1996 Ovation 1768-7LTD " custom "
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-17-2013, 12:20 AM
billgennaro billgennaro is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: DeLand, FL
Posts: 4,841
Default

check and find out if your D25 has laminated back and sides. i believe they do.
__________________
Bill Gennaro

"Accept your lot, whatever it may be, in ultimate humbleness. Accept in humbleness what you are, not as grounds for regret but as a living challenge."
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-17-2013, 06:12 AM
PTC Bernie PTC Bernie is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: PTC GA
Posts: 4,537
Default D25 vs D40

Hi Bill.

I know that the rounded back on the D25 is laminate, not sure about the sides now that you mention it.

I also have this posted over at LTG but thought I'd post it here as this site seems to get more traffic.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-17-2013, 12:17 PM
concretecowboy7 concretecowboy7 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Cleveland, OHIO
Posts: 146
Default

I own these two guitars also (not same years) and I guess it boils down to which one you like better.

I don't think the sides of a D25 are laminate and there is no shame in the arched back laminate Guild uses. They use it on the high end F50 maple version and those will hold their own against any J200 out there.

It seems that a lot of people like the D25 over the 35/40 due to them being a bit louder (attributed to the arched back). Even though the the 25 was a "cheaper" guitars it maintains a semi-legendary status among Guilds.

If you need to get rid of one, go with your gut and keep the one you play more often.
__________________

Cutting masters for vinyl record production since 2010.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-17-2013, 01:28 PM
Dr. Spivey Dr. Spivey is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: N.E. Wisconsin
Posts: 2,985
Default

The sides on your D25 are solid, backs were laminated, outer layers mahogany, inner most commonly poplar but other woods were used.

What was your question on bracing, wood types or patterns?

Guild was known to generate lots of oddities through the Westerly years as old parts that were lying around sometimes got thrown into production. Sometimes changes were made during production runs but the exact date or serial number wasn't well documented. Westerly was a small factory that produced an incredible number of models and variants. When Fender moved production to California, a lot of history was tossed in the dumpsters.
__________________
All the years combine, they melt into a dream
A broken angel sings from a guitar

2005 Gibson J-45
1985 Guild D17
2012 Fender Am. Std. Stratocaster
1997 Guild Bluesbird
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-17-2013, 04:33 PM
PTC Bernie PTC Bernie is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: PTC GA
Posts: 4,537
Default

My question was whether there was any difference either in the wood used or style of bracing, scalloped vs non. If not then the the only real difference is the arched back vs the flat back.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-17-2013, 05:30 PM
RussB RussB is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 1,100
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PTC Bernie View Post
My question was whether there was any difference either in the wood used or style of bracing, scalloped vs non. If not then the the only real difference is the arched back vs the flat back.

Why not look inside each guitar and compare the bracing for yourself?
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-17-2013, 07:13 PM
woodruff woodruff is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Tucson
Posts: 5,560
Default

Neither D40 or D25 were scalloped braced during those years. D40 definitely had a higher grade of tone woods and appointments. I have a 1971 D25M (with a flat back, all solid), and I love its tone. However, I just played a 1966 D40 at GC, and there really is no comparison. To my ears, I would keep the D40 if it were up to me.
__________________
wood

'71 Guild D25
'83 Guild D35
'98 Guild F30r
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-18-2013, 12:19 PM
PTC Bernie PTC Bernie is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: PTC GA
Posts: 4,537
Default D25 vs D40

Quote:
Originally Posted by woodruff View Post
Neither D40 or D25 were scalloped braced during those years. D40 definitely had a higher grade of tone woods and appointments. I have a 1971 D25M (with a flat back, all solid), and I love its tone. However, I just played a 1966 D40 at GC, and there really is no comparison. To my ears, I would keep the D40 if it were up to me.
And, from a purely monetary point of view, the D25 is in near mint condition, one minor ding on the top, no checquing or wear anywhere on it, whereas the D40 is in good shape for its age, but......... So the D25 would fetch more toward the top of it's price range, just thinking out loud here.

It's like trying to decide which one of your kids to give up.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 08-18-2013, 01:01 PM
woodruff woodruff is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Tucson
Posts: 5,560
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PTC Bernie View Post
And, from a purely monetary point of view, the D25 is in near mint condition, one minor ding on the top, no checquing or wear anywhere on it, whereas the D40 is in good shape for its age, but......... So the D25 would fetch more toward the top of it's price range, just thinking out loud here.

It's like trying to decide which one of your kids to give up.
then i would make the decision about laminate wood vs solid wood. the D25s didnt stay all solid for long, i think by 73 or 74, they moved to a laminate back. however, many on the guild forum swear by the laminate backed D25s, as they are louder than the flat backs. you would make a good 300-400 more if you sell the D40, but i would give up a laminate over a solid wood most days. still, if you really love your D25, no one could possible fault you for giving up the D40. just by the fact of the post, i can tell you really dig the D25. tough call The good news is that D40s are really easy to find on ebay, etc.

D25 is still Guild's most sold acoustic dreadnought.
__________________
wood

'71 Guild D25
'83 Guild D35
'98 Guild F30r
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 08-18-2013, 01:02 PM
plroad21 plroad21 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 95
Default Guild D25 vs D40

I would never give up my 79 D25. It gets 90% of my live action and almost 100% of studio work. Records better than my '07 Gibson Hummingbird, which cost much more. Last session I did, it beat out the Hummingbird, two D28s and a really nice older Irish Lowden...
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 08-18-2013, 01:04 PM
woodruff woodruff is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Tucson
Posts: 5,560
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by plroad21 View Post
I would never give up my 79 D25. It gets 90% of my live action and almost 100% of studio work. Records better than my '07 Gibson Hummingbird, which cost much more. Last session I did, it beat out the Hummingbird, two D28s and a really nice older Irish Lowden...
see? this is what i hear about the laminate backed D25s from the 70s and 80s. nice.
__________________
wood

'71 Guild D25
'83 Guild D35
'98 Guild F30r
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 08-18-2013, 06:51 PM
plroad21 plroad21 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 95
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by woodruff View Post
see? this is what i hear about the laminate backed D25s from the 70s and 80s. nice.
yep... there's just something about the way the frequencies of that guitar work with a good mic that is just magical..
Reply With Quote
Reply

  The Acoustic Guitar Forum > General Acoustic Guitar and Amplification Discussion > General Acoustic Guitar Discussion

Thread Tools





All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:25 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, The Acoustic Guitar Forum
vB Ad Management by =RedTyger=